Cargando…
Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection
OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of efficiency between density gradient centrifugation (DGC) method and an extended horizontal swim-up (SU) method. METHODS: A total of 97 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization were enrolled in the study. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and treated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883228 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22191 |
_version_ | 1785043521415151616 |
---|---|
author | Jamil, Malak Debbarh, Hasnae Kabit, Amal Ennaji, Mohamed Koumba, Loic Kaarouch, Ismail Zarqaoui, Mohamed Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi Hissane, El Mehdi Saadani, Brahim Vanderzwalmen, Pierre Louanjli, Nourredine Cadi, Rachida |
author_facet | Jamil, Malak Debbarh, Hasnae Kabit, Amal Ennaji, Mohamed Koumba, Loic Kaarouch, Ismail Zarqaoui, Mohamed Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi Hissane, El Mehdi Saadani, Brahim Vanderzwalmen, Pierre Louanjli, Nourredine Cadi, Rachida |
author_sort | Jamil, Malak |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of efficiency between density gradient centrifugation (DGC) method and an extended horizontal swim-up (SU) method. METHODS: A total of 97 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization were enrolled in the study. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and treated using DGC, extended horizontal SU, and combined methods. DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were detected in native semen samples and their three corresponding aliquots. The corresponding mature oocytes of each semen sample were divided into two sibling cultures. The first sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from DGC, and the second sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from the combination of both methods. Fertilization rate and embryonic development were assessed at day 3. RESULTS: DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation was significantly low in DGC and extended horizontal SU samples; however, the rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were significantly lower in extended horizontal SU samples than in DGC samples. The lowest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with both methods. The highest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with DGC. No significant difference was found in the fertilization rate or day 3 embryos between sibling cultures. CONCLUSION: The combination of DGC and the extended horizontal SU techniques is best for giving the lowest rates of sperm DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10191761 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101917612023-05-18 Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection Jamil, Malak Debbarh, Hasnae Kabit, Amal Ennaji, Mohamed Koumba, Loic Kaarouch, Ismail Zarqaoui, Mohamed Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi Hissane, El Mehdi Saadani, Brahim Vanderzwalmen, Pierre Louanjli, Nourredine Cadi, Rachida Obstet Gynecol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of efficiency between density gradient centrifugation (DGC) method and an extended horizontal swim-up (SU) method. METHODS: A total of 97 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization were enrolled in the study. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and treated using DGC, extended horizontal SU, and combined methods. DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were detected in native semen samples and their three corresponding aliquots. The corresponding mature oocytes of each semen sample were divided into two sibling cultures. The first sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from DGC, and the second sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from the combination of both methods. Fertilization rate and embryonic development were assessed at day 3. RESULTS: DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation was significantly low in DGC and extended horizontal SU samples; however, the rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were significantly lower in extended horizontal SU samples than in DGC samples. The lowest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with both methods. The highest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with DGC. No significant difference was found in the fertilization rate or day 3 embryos between sibling cultures. CONCLUSION: The combination of DGC and the extended horizontal SU techniques is best for giving the lowest rates of sperm DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2023-05 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10191761/ /pubmed/36883228 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22191 Text en Copyright © 2023 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jamil, Malak Debbarh, Hasnae Kabit, Amal Ennaji, Mohamed Koumba, Loic Kaarouch, Ismail Zarqaoui, Mohamed Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi Hissane, El Mehdi Saadani, Brahim Vanderzwalmen, Pierre Louanjli, Nourredine Cadi, Rachida Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection |
title | Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection |
title_full | Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection |
title_fullStr | Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection |
title_short | Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection |
title_sort | comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883228 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22191 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamilmalak comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT debbarhhasnae comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT kabitamal comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT ennajimohamed comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT koumbaloic comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT kaarouchismail comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT zarqaouimohamed comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT senhajiwassimrhazi comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT hissaneelmehdi comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT saadanibrahim comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT vanderzwalmenpierre comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT louanjlinourredine comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection AT cadirachida comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection |