Cargando…

Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection

OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of efficiency between density gradient centrifugation (DGC) method and an extended horizontal swim-up (SU) method. METHODS: A total of 97 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization were enrolled in the study. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and treated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamil, Malak, Debbarh, Hasnae, Kabit, Amal, Ennaji, Mohamed, Koumba, Loic, Kaarouch, Ismail, Zarqaoui, Mohamed, Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi, Hissane, El Mehdi, Saadani, Brahim, Vanderzwalmen, Pierre, Louanjli, Nourredine, Cadi, Rachida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883228
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22191
_version_ 1785043521415151616
author Jamil, Malak
Debbarh, Hasnae
Kabit, Amal
Ennaji, Mohamed
Koumba, Loic
Kaarouch, Ismail
Zarqaoui, Mohamed
Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi
Hissane, El Mehdi
Saadani, Brahim
Vanderzwalmen, Pierre
Louanjli, Nourredine
Cadi, Rachida
author_facet Jamil, Malak
Debbarh, Hasnae
Kabit, Amal
Ennaji, Mohamed
Koumba, Loic
Kaarouch, Ismail
Zarqaoui, Mohamed
Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi
Hissane, El Mehdi
Saadani, Brahim
Vanderzwalmen, Pierre
Louanjli, Nourredine
Cadi, Rachida
author_sort Jamil, Malak
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of efficiency between density gradient centrifugation (DGC) method and an extended horizontal swim-up (SU) method. METHODS: A total of 97 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization were enrolled in the study. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and treated using DGC, extended horizontal SU, and combined methods. DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were detected in native semen samples and their three corresponding aliquots. The corresponding mature oocytes of each semen sample were divided into two sibling cultures. The first sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from DGC, and the second sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from the combination of both methods. Fertilization rate and embryonic development were assessed at day 3. RESULTS: DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation was significantly low in DGC and extended horizontal SU samples; however, the rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were significantly lower in extended horizontal SU samples than in DGC samples. The lowest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with both methods. The highest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with DGC. No significant difference was found in the fertilization rate or day 3 embryos between sibling cultures. CONCLUSION: The combination of DGC and the extended horizontal SU techniques is best for giving the lowest rates of sperm DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10191761
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101917612023-05-18 Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection Jamil, Malak Debbarh, Hasnae Kabit, Amal Ennaji, Mohamed Koumba, Loic Kaarouch, Ismail Zarqaoui, Mohamed Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi Hissane, El Mehdi Saadani, Brahim Vanderzwalmen, Pierre Louanjli, Nourredine Cadi, Rachida Obstet Gynecol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of efficiency between density gradient centrifugation (DGC) method and an extended horizontal swim-up (SU) method. METHODS: A total of 97 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization were enrolled in the study. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and treated using DGC, extended horizontal SU, and combined methods. DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were detected in native semen samples and their three corresponding aliquots. The corresponding mature oocytes of each semen sample were divided into two sibling cultures. The first sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from DGC, and the second sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from the combination of both methods. Fertilization rate and embryonic development were assessed at day 3. RESULTS: DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation was significantly low in DGC and extended horizontal SU samples; however, the rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were significantly lower in extended horizontal SU samples than in DGC samples. The lowest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with both methods. The highest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with DGC. No significant difference was found in the fertilization rate or day 3 embryos between sibling cultures. CONCLUSION: The combination of DGC and the extended horizontal SU techniques is best for giving the lowest rates of sperm DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2023-05 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10191761/ /pubmed/36883228 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22191 Text en Copyright © 2023 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jamil, Malak
Debbarh, Hasnae
Kabit, Amal
Ennaji, Mohamed
Koumba, Loic
Kaarouch, Ismail
Zarqaoui, Mohamed
Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi
Hissane, El Mehdi
Saadani, Brahim
Vanderzwalmen, Pierre
Louanjli, Nourredine
Cadi, Rachida
Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection
title Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection
title_full Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection
title_fullStr Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection
title_short Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection
title_sort comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191761/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36883228
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22191
work_keys_str_mv AT jamilmalak comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT debbarhhasnae comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT kabitamal comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT ennajimohamed comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT koumbaloic comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT kaarouchismail comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT zarqaouimohamed comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT senhajiwassimrhazi comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT hissaneelmehdi comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT saadanibrahim comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT vanderzwalmenpierre comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT louanjlinourredine comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection
AT cadirachida comparisonbetweendensitygradientcentrifugationmethodanextendedversionofthehorizontalswimupmethodandthecombinationofbothforspermselection