Cargando…

Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup

PURPOSE: There is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: In this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extens...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ticconi, Carlo, Nicastri, Elena, D’Ippolito, Silvia, Chiaramonte, Carlo, Pietropolli, Adalgisa, Scambia, Giovanni, Di Simone, Nicoletta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z
_version_ 1785043558979338240
author Ticconi, Carlo
Nicastri, Elena
D’Ippolito, Silvia
Chiaramonte, Carlo
Pietropolli, Adalgisa
Scambia, Giovanni
Di Simone, Nicoletta
author_facet Ticconi, Carlo
Nicastri, Elena
D’Ippolito, Silvia
Chiaramonte, Carlo
Pietropolli, Adalgisa
Scambia, Giovanni
Di Simone, Nicoletta
author_sort Ticconi, Carlo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: In this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extensive diagnostic workup including 44 diagnostic factors divided into 7 major categories. RESULTS: The rates of abnormalities found were: (1) genital infections: 11.74%; (2) uterine anatomic defects: 23.72%; (3) endocrine disorders: 29.42%; (4) thrombophilias: 62%; (5) autoimmune abnormalities: 39.2%; (6) parental karyotype abnormalities 2.25%; (7) clinical factors: 87.78%. Six hundred and fifty-nine out of eight hundred and forty-three women (78.17%) had more than one abnormality. The mean number of pregnancy losses increased by increasing the number of the abnormalities found (r = 0.86949, P < 0.02). The factors associated with the highest mean number of pregnancy losses were cervical isthmic incompetence, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, unicornuate uterus, anti-prothrombin A antibodies, protein C deficiency, and lupus anticoagulant. The majority of the considered abnormalities had similar, non-significant prevalence between women with 2 versus ≥ 3 pregnancy losses with the exception of age ≥ 35 years and MTHFR A1298C heterozygote mutation. No difference was found between women with primary and secondary RPL stratified according to the number of abnormalities detected (Chi-square: 8.55, P = 0.07). In these women, the only factors found to be present with statistically different rates were age ≥ 35 years, cigarette smoking, and genital infection by Ureaplasma. CONCLUSION: A patient-based diagnostic approach in women with RPL could be clinically useful and could represent a basis for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10191960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101919602023-05-19 Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup Ticconi, Carlo Nicastri, Elena D’Ippolito, Silvia Chiaramonte, Carlo Pietropolli, Adalgisa Scambia, Giovanni Di Simone, Nicoletta Arch Gynecol Obstet General Gynecology PURPOSE: There is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: In this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extensive diagnostic workup including 44 diagnostic factors divided into 7 major categories. RESULTS: The rates of abnormalities found were: (1) genital infections: 11.74%; (2) uterine anatomic defects: 23.72%; (3) endocrine disorders: 29.42%; (4) thrombophilias: 62%; (5) autoimmune abnormalities: 39.2%; (6) parental karyotype abnormalities 2.25%; (7) clinical factors: 87.78%. Six hundred and fifty-nine out of eight hundred and forty-three women (78.17%) had more than one abnormality. The mean number of pregnancy losses increased by increasing the number of the abnormalities found (r = 0.86949, P < 0.02). The factors associated with the highest mean number of pregnancy losses were cervical isthmic incompetence, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, unicornuate uterus, anti-prothrombin A antibodies, protein C deficiency, and lupus anticoagulant. The majority of the considered abnormalities had similar, non-significant prevalence between women with 2 versus ≥ 3 pregnancy losses with the exception of age ≥ 35 years and MTHFR A1298C heterozygote mutation. No difference was found between women with primary and secondary RPL stratified according to the number of abnormalities detected (Chi-square: 8.55, P = 0.07). In these women, the only factors found to be present with statistically different rates were age ≥ 35 years, cigarette smoking, and genital infection by Ureaplasma. CONCLUSION: A patient-based diagnostic approach in women with RPL could be clinically useful and could represent a basis for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10191960/ /pubmed/36964323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General Gynecology
Ticconi, Carlo
Nicastri, Elena
D’Ippolito, Silvia
Chiaramonte, Carlo
Pietropolli, Adalgisa
Scambia, Giovanni
Di Simone, Nicoletta
Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
title Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
title_full Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
title_fullStr Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
title_short Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
title_sort diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
topic General Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z
work_keys_str_mv AT ticconicarlo diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup
AT nicastrielena diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup
AT dippolitosilvia diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup
AT chiaramontecarlo diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup
AT pietropolliadalgisa diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup
AT scambiagiovanni diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup
AT disimonenicoletta diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup