Cargando…
Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup
PURPOSE: There is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: In this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extens...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z |
_version_ | 1785043558979338240 |
---|---|
author | Ticconi, Carlo Nicastri, Elena D’Ippolito, Silvia Chiaramonte, Carlo Pietropolli, Adalgisa Scambia, Giovanni Di Simone, Nicoletta |
author_facet | Ticconi, Carlo Nicastri, Elena D’Ippolito, Silvia Chiaramonte, Carlo Pietropolli, Adalgisa Scambia, Giovanni Di Simone, Nicoletta |
author_sort | Ticconi, Carlo |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: In this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extensive diagnostic workup including 44 diagnostic factors divided into 7 major categories. RESULTS: The rates of abnormalities found were: (1) genital infections: 11.74%; (2) uterine anatomic defects: 23.72%; (3) endocrine disorders: 29.42%; (4) thrombophilias: 62%; (5) autoimmune abnormalities: 39.2%; (6) parental karyotype abnormalities 2.25%; (7) clinical factors: 87.78%. Six hundred and fifty-nine out of eight hundred and forty-three women (78.17%) had more than one abnormality. The mean number of pregnancy losses increased by increasing the number of the abnormalities found (r = 0.86949, P < 0.02). The factors associated with the highest mean number of pregnancy losses were cervical isthmic incompetence, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, unicornuate uterus, anti-prothrombin A antibodies, protein C deficiency, and lupus anticoagulant. The majority of the considered abnormalities had similar, non-significant prevalence between women with 2 versus ≥ 3 pregnancy losses with the exception of age ≥ 35 years and MTHFR A1298C heterozygote mutation. No difference was found between women with primary and secondary RPL stratified according to the number of abnormalities detected (Chi-square: 8.55, P = 0.07). In these women, the only factors found to be present with statistically different rates were age ≥ 35 years, cigarette smoking, and genital infection by Ureaplasma. CONCLUSION: A patient-based diagnostic approach in women with RPL could be clinically useful and could represent a basis for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10191960 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101919602023-05-19 Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup Ticconi, Carlo Nicastri, Elena D’Ippolito, Silvia Chiaramonte, Carlo Pietropolli, Adalgisa Scambia, Giovanni Di Simone, Nicoletta Arch Gynecol Obstet General Gynecology PURPOSE: There is limited information on the risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). METHODS: In this study, a patient-based approach was used to investigate the possible involvement and relative relevance of a large number of diagnostic factors in 843 women with RPL who underwent an extensive diagnostic workup including 44 diagnostic factors divided into 7 major categories. RESULTS: The rates of abnormalities found were: (1) genital infections: 11.74%; (2) uterine anatomic defects: 23.72%; (3) endocrine disorders: 29.42%; (4) thrombophilias: 62%; (5) autoimmune abnormalities: 39.2%; (6) parental karyotype abnormalities 2.25%; (7) clinical factors: 87.78%. Six hundred and fifty-nine out of eight hundred and forty-three women (78.17%) had more than one abnormality. The mean number of pregnancy losses increased by increasing the number of the abnormalities found (r = 0.86949, P < 0.02). The factors associated with the highest mean number of pregnancy losses were cervical isthmic incompetence, anti-beta-2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies, unicornuate uterus, anti-prothrombin A antibodies, protein C deficiency, and lupus anticoagulant. The majority of the considered abnormalities had similar, non-significant prevalence between women with 2 versus ≥ 3 pregnancy losses with the exception of age ≥ 35 years and MTHFR A1298C heterozygote mutation. No difference was found between women with primary and secondary RPL stratified according to the number of abnormalities detected (Chi-square: 8.55, P = 0.07). In these women, the only factors found to be present with statistically different rates were age ≥ 35 years, cigarette smoking, and genital infection by Ureaplasma. CONCLUSION: A patient-based diagnostic approach in women with RPL could be clinically useful and could represent a basis for future research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-25 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10191960/ /pubmed/36964323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | General Gynecology Ticconi, Carlo Nicastri, Elena D’Ippolito, Silvia Chiaramonte, Carlo Pietropolli, Adalgisa Scambia, Giovanni Di Simone, Nicoletta Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup |
title | Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup |
title_full | Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup |
title_short | Diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup |
title_sort | diagnostic factors for recurrent pregnancy loss: an expanded workup |
topic | General Gynecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10191960/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36964323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07001-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ticconicarlo diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup AT nicastrielena diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup AT dippolitosilvia diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup AT chiaramontecarlo diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup AT pietropolliadalgisa diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup AT scambiagiovanni diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup AT disimonenicoletta diagnosticfactorsforrecurrentpregnancylossanexpandedworkup |