Cargando…

Sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Does stem size matter?

BACKGROUND: Sexual activity is an important component of quality of life. To date, no studies have examined the impact of stem design on return to sexual activity (RTS) and quality of sex life after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess preoperative and postop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hauer, Georg, Sadoghi, Patrick, Smolle, Maria, Zaussinger, Sabrina, Friesenbichler, Joerg, Leithner, Andreas, Maurer-Ertl, Werner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04614-y
_version_ 1785043572898136064
author Hauer, Georg
Sadoghi, Patrick
Smolle, Maria
Zaussinger, Sabrina
Friesenbichler, Joerg
Leithner, Andreas
Maurer-Ertl, Werner
author_facet Hauer, Georg
Sadoghi, Patrick
Smolle, Maria
Zaussinger, Sabrina
Friesenbichler, Joerg
Leithner, Andreas
Maurer-Ertl, Werner
author_sort Hauer, Georg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sexual activity is an important component of quality of life. To date, no studies have examined the impact of stem design on return to sexual activity (RTS) and quality of sex life after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess preoperative and postoperative sexual habits, joint awareness and physical activity in working-age patients undergoing short-stem (n = 176) or straight-stem (n = 97) THA. RESULTS: No differences were noted in time until RTS based on the stem design (short stems vs. straight stems; 6 [IQR: 4–10] vs. 6 [4–10] weeks; p = 0.996). Multivariate analysis revealed that higher patient BMI (p = 0.04), female gender (p < 0.001) and lower FJS-12 (p = 0.006) were significantly associated with delayed RTS. Improved hip mobility and reduced pain mainly contribute to improved quality of sexual activity postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study, hence, indicates that stem design has no impact on time until resumption of sexual activity in patients < 65 years. Female obese individuals who are aware of their artificial joint in daily life are at increased risk of delayed RTS after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10192171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101921712023-05-19 Sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Does stem size matter? Hauer, Georg Sadoghi, Patrick Smolle, Maria Zaussinger, Sabrina Friesenbichler, Joerg Leithner, Andreas Maurer-Ertl, Werner Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Hip Arthroplasty BACKGROUND: Sexual activity is an important component of quality of life. To date, no studies have examined the impact of stem design on return to sexual activity (RTS) and quality of sex life after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to assess preoperative and postoperative sexual habits, joint awareness and physical activity in working-age patients undergoing short-stem (n = 176) or straight-stem (n = 97) THA. RESULTS: No differences were noted in time until RTS based on the stem design (short stems vs. straight stems; 6 [IQR: 4–10] vs. 6 [4–10] weeks; p = 0.996). Multivariate analysis revealed that higher patient BMI (p = 0.04), female gender (p < 0.001) and lower FJS-12 (p = 0.006) were significantly associated with delayed RTS. Improved hip mobility and reduced pain mainly contribute to improved quality of sexual activity postoperatively. CONCLUSION: This study, hence, indicates that stem design has no impact on time until resumption of sexual activity in patients < 65 years. Female obese individuals who are aware of their artificial joint in daily life are at increased risk of delayed RTS after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10192171/ /pubmed/36114870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04614-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Hip Arthroplasty
Hauer, Georg
Sadoghi, Patrick
Smolle, Maria
Zaussinger, Sabrina
Friesenbichler, Joerg
Leithner, Andreas
Maurer-Ertl, Werner
Sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Does stem size matter?
title Sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Does stem size matter?
title_full Sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Does stem size matter?
title_fullStr Sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Does stem size matter?
title_full_unstemmed Sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Does stem size matter?
title_short Sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. Does stem size matter?
title_sort sexual activity after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. does stem size matter?
topic Hip Arthroplasty
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36114870
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04614-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hauergeorg sexualactivityaftershortstemtotalhiparthroplastydoesstemsizematter
AT sadoghipatrick sexualactivityaftershortstemtotalhiparthroplastydoesstemsizematter
AT smollemaria sexualactivityaftershortstemtotalhiparthroplastydoesstemsizematter
AT zaussingersabrina sexualactivityaftershortstemtotalhiparthroplastydoesstemsizematter
AT friesenbichlerjoerg sexualactivityaftershortstemtotalhiparthroplastydoesstemsizematter
AT leithnerandreas sexualactivityaftershortstemtotalhiparthroplastydoesstemsizematter
AT maurerertlwerner sexualactivityaftershortstemtotalhiparthroplastydoesstemsizematter