Cargando…

Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS: Liver fibrosis scores (LFSs) are non‐invasive and effective tools for estimating cardiovascular risks. To better understand the advantages and limitations of currently available LFSs, we determined to compare the predictive values of LFSs in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Yalin, Guo, Siyu, Dong, Yugang, Liu, Chen, Zhu, Wengen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14336
_version_ 1785043586733047808
author Cao, Yalin
Guo, Siyu
Dong, Yugang
Liu, Chen
Zhu, Wengen
author_facet Cao, Yalin
Guo, Siyu
Dong, Yugang
Liu, Chen
Zhu, Wengen
author_sort Cao, Yalin
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Liver fibrosis scores (LFSs) are non‐invasive and effective tools for estimating cardiovascular risks. To better understand the advantages and limitations of currently available LFSs, we determined to compare the predictive values of LFSs in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) for primary composite outcome, atrial fibrillation (AF), and other clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a secondary analysis of the TOPCAT trial, and 3212 HFpEF patients were enrolled. Five LFSs, namely, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis‐4 score (FIB‐4), BARD, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio, and Health Utilities Index (HUI) scores were adopted. Cox proportional hazard model and competing risk regression model were performed to assess the associations between LFSs and outcomes. The discriminatory power of each LFS was evaluated by calculating the area under the curves (AUCs). During a median follow‐up of 3.3 years, a 1‐point increase in the NFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.17], BARD (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.10–1.30), and HUI (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.09–1.89) scores was associated with an increased risk of primary outcome. Patients with high levels of NFS (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.26–2.13), BARD (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25–2.15), AST/ALT ratio (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.05–1.60), and HUI (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.02–1.53) were at an increased risk of primary outcome. Subjects who developed AF were more likely to have high NFS (HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.13–4.32). High levels of NFS and HUI scores were a significant predictor of any hospitalization and hospitalization for heart failure. The AUCs for the NFS in predicting primary outcome (0.672; 95% CI 0.642–0.702) and incident of AF (0.678; 95% CI 0.622–0.734) were higher than other LFSs. CONCLUSIONS: In light of these findings, NFS appears to have superior predictive and prognostic utility compared with AST/ALT ratio, FIB‐4, BARD, and HUI scores. Clinical trial registration: (https://clinicaltrials.gov). Unique identifier: NCT00094302.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10192244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101922442023-05-19 Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Cao, Yalin Guo, Siyu Dong, Yugang Liu, Chen Zhu, Wengen ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: Liver fibrosis scores (LFSs) are non‐invasive and effective tools for estimating cardiovascular risks. To better understand the advantages and limitations of currently available LFSs, we determined to compare the predictive values of LFSs in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) for primary composite outcome, atrial fibrillation (AF), and other clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a secondary analysis of the TOPCAT trial, and 3212 HFpEF patients were enrolled. Five LFSs, namely, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis‐4 score (FIB‐4), BARD, aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio, and Health Utilities Index (HUI) scores were adopted. Cox proportional hazard model and competing risk regression model were performed to assess the associations between LFSs and outcomes. The discriminatory power of each LFS was evaluated by calculating the area under the curves (AUCs). During a median follow‐up of 3.3 years, a 1‐point increase in the NFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.17], BARD (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.10–1.30), and HUI (HR 1.44; 95% CI 1.09–1.89) scores was associated with an increased risk of primary outcome. Patients with high levels of NFS (HR 1.63; 95% CI 1.26–2.13), BARD (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25–2.15), AST/ALT ratio (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.05–1.60), and HUI (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.02–1.53) were at an increased risk of primary outcome. Subjects who developed AF were more likely to have high NFS (HR 2.21; 95% CI 1.13–4.32). High levels of NFS and HUI scores were a significant predictor of any hospitalization and hospitalization for heart failure. The AUCs for the NFS in predicting primary outcome (0.672; 95% CI 0.642–0.702) and incident of AF (0.678; 95% CI 0.622–0.734) were higher than other LFSs. CONCLUSIONS: In light of these findings, NFS appears to have superior predictive and prognostic utility compared with AST/ALT ratio, FIB‐4, BARD, and HUI scores. Clinical trial registration: (https://clinicaltrials.gov). Unique identifier: NCT00094302. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10192244/ /pubmed/36864701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14336 Text en © 2023 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cao, Yalin
Guo, Siyu
Dong, Yugang
Liu, Chen
Zhu, Wengen
Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_full Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_fullStr Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_short Comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
title_sort comparison of liver fibrosis scores for predicting mortality and morbidity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36864701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14336
work_keys_str_mv AT caoyalin comparisonofliverfibrosisscoresforpredictingmortalityandmorbidityinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT guosiyu comparisonofliverfibrosisscoresforpredictingmortalityandmorbidityinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT dongyugang comparisonofliverfibrosisscoresforpredictingmortalityandmorbidityinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT liuchen comparisonofliverfibrosisscoresforpredictingmortalityandmorbidityinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction
AT zhuwengen comparisonofliverfibrosisscoresforpredictingmortalityandmorbidityinheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfraction