Cargando…
A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Given the associated risks with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it is crucial to determine how the implant will affect the valve dynamics and cardiac function, and if TAVR will improve or worsen the outcome of the patient. Effective treatment strategies, indeed, rely heavily on the co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37198194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33511-6 |
_version_ | 1785043640594202624 |
---|---|
author | Bahadormanesh, Nikrouz Tomka, Benjamin Abdelkhalek, Mohamed Khodaei, Seyedvahid Maftoon, Nima Keshavarz-Motamed, Zahra |
author_facet | Bahadormanesh, Nikrouz Tomka, Benjamin Abdelkhalek, Mohamed Khodaei, Seyedvahid Maftoon, Nima Keshavarz-Motamed, Zahra |
author_sort | Bahadormanesh, Nikrouz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Given the associated risks with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it is crucial to determine how the implant will affect the valve dynamics and cardiac function, and if TAVR will improve or worsen the outcome of the patient. Effective treatment strategies, indeed, rely heavily on the complete understanding of the valve dynamics. We developed an innovative Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational framework that can function as a diagnostic tool to assess valve dynamics in patients with aortic stenosis in both pre- and post-TAVR status. Clinical Doppler pressure was reduced by TAVR (52.2 ± 20.4 vs. 17.3 ± 13.8 [mmHg], p < 0.001), but it was not always accompanied by improvements in valve dynamics and left ventricle (LV) hemodynamics metrics. TAVR had no effect on LV workload in 4 patients, and LV workload post-TAVR significantly rose in 4 other patients. Despite the group level improvements in maximum LV pressure (166.4 ± 32.2 vs 131.4 ± 16.9 [mmHg], p < 0.05), only 5 of the 12 patients (41%) had a decrease in LV pressure. Moreover, TAVR did not always improve valve dynamics. TAVR did not necessarily result in a decrease (in 9 out of 12 patients investigated in this study) in major principal stress on the aortic valve leaflets which is one of the main contributors in valve degeneration and, consequently, failure of heart valves. Diastolic stresses increased significantly post-TAVR (34%, 109% and 81%, p < 0.001) for each left, right and non-coronary leaflets respectively. Moreover, we quantified the stiffness and material properties of aortic valve leaflets which correspond with the reduced calcified region average stiffness among leaflets (66%, 74% and 62%; p < 0.001; N = 12). Valve dynamics post-intervention should be quantified and monitored to ensure the improvement of patient conditions and prevent any further complications. Improper evaluation of biomechanical valve features pre-intervention as well as post-intervention may result in harmful effects post-TAVR in patients including paravalvular leaks, valve degeneration, failure of TAVR and heart failure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10192526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101925262023-05-19 A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement Bahadormanesh, Nikrouz Tomka, Benjamin Abdelkhalek, Mohamed Khodaei, Seyedvahid Maftoon, Nima Keshavarz-Motamed, Zahra Sci Rep Article Given the associated risks with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), it is crucial to determine how the implant will affect the valve dynamics and cardiac function, and if TAVR will improve or worsen the outcome of the patient. Effective treatment strategies, indeed, rely heavily on the complete understanding of the valve dynamics. We developed an innovative Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational framework that can function as a diagnostic tool to assess valve dynamics in patients with aortic stenosis in both pre- and post-TAVR status. Clinical Doppler pressure was reduced by TAVR (52.2 ± 20.4 vs. 17.3 ± 13.8 [mmHg], p < 0.001), but it was not always accompanied by improvements in valve dynamics and left ventricle (LV) hemodynamics metrics. TAVR had no effect on LV workload in 4 patients, and LV workload post-TAVR significantly rose in 4 other patients. Despite the group level improvements in maximum LV pressure (166.4 ± 32.2 vs 131.4 ± 16.9 [mmHg], p < 0.05), only 5 of the 12 patients (41%) had a decrease in LV pressure. Moreover, TAVR did not always improve valve dynamics. TAVR did not necessarily result in a decrease (in 9 out of 12 patients investigated in this study) in major principal stress on the aortic valve leaflets which is one of the main contributors in valve degeneration and, consequently, failure of heart valves. Diastolic stresses increased significantly post-TAVR (34%, 109% and 81%, p < 0.001) for each left, right and non-coronary leaflets respectively. Moreover, we quantified the stiffness and material properties of aortic valve leaflets which correspond with the reduced calcified region average stiffness among leaflets (66%, 74% and 62%; p < 0.001; N = 12). Valve dynamics post-intervention should be quantified and monitored to ensure the improvement of patient conditions and prevent any further complications. Improper evaluation of biomechanical valve features pre-intervention as well as post-intervention may result in harmful effects post-TAVR in patients including paravalvular leaks, valve degeneration, failure of TAVR and heart failure. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10192526/ /pubmed/37198194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33511-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Bahadormanesh, Nikrouz Tomka, Benjamin Abdelkhalek, Mohamed Khodaei, Seyedvahid Maftoon, Nima Keshavarz-Motamed, Zahra A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title | A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_full | A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_fullStr | A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_full_unstemmed | A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_short | A Doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
title_sort | doppler-exclusive non-invasive computational diagnostic framework for personalized transcatheter aortic valve replacement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37198194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33511-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bahadormaneshnikrouz adopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT tomkabenjamin adopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT abdelkhalekmohamed adopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT khodaeiseyedvahid adopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT maftoonnima adopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT keshavarzmotamedzahra adopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT bahadormaneshnikrouz dopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT tomkabenjamin dopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT abdelkhalekmohamed dopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT khodaeiseyedvahid dopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT maftoonnima dopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement AT keshavarzmotamedzahra dopplerexclusivenoninvasivecomputationaldiagnosticframeworkforpersonalizedtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacement |