Cargando…

Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of On-Clamp Versus Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis of 9027 Patients

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the comparative efficacy and safety between on-clamp and off-clamp partial nephrectomy in patients with renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was pre-registered on The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serag, Hosam, Agag, Ayman, Naushad, Naufal, Mukherjee, Ankur, Harrington-Vogt, Maria, Deb, Abdalla Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Urology 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37877854
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22207
_version_ 1785043687765442560
author Serag, Hosam
Agag, Ayman
Naushad, Naufal
Mukherjee, Ankur
Harrington-Vogt, Maria
Deb, Abdalla Ali
author_facet Serag, Hosam
Agag, Ayman
Naushad, Naufal
Mukherjee, Ankur
Harrington-Vogt, Maria
Deb, Abdalla Ali
author_sort Serag, Hosam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the comparative efficacy and safety between on-clamp and off-clamp partial nephrectomy in patients with renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was pre-registered on The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022339127). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. A manual search was also conducted to avoid missing relevant studies. All observational and experimental studies reporting the comparative efficacy and/or safety of on-clamp versus off-clamp partial nephrectomy were included. Outcomes were divided into 3 categories: perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and revised Cochrane ROB-II tool for nonrandomized and randomized studies, respectively. Fixed- and random-effect models were implemented to pool the mean difference and log odds ratio of continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine if the effect size was driven by a single study, and Egger’s regression test was used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were meta-analyzed. The on-clamping method showed greater benefit when compared to the off-clamping technique in terms of perioperative (estimated blood loss and blood transfusion), functional (estimated glomerular filtration rate), and oncologic outcomes (tumor resection time). However, it is associated with higher risk for complications. Most studies were of moderate-to-serious risk of bias. CONCLUSION: On-clamping shows superiority in terms of estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and tumor resection time. However, it is associated with increased risk of complications. The selection of the technique should be tailored per individual case based on their comorbidities and preoperative risk profile.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10192728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Turkish Association of Urology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101927282023-05-19 Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of On-Clamp Versus Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis of 9027 Patients Serag, Hosam Agag, Ayman Naushad, Naufal Mukherjee, Ankur Harrington-Vogt, Maria Deb, Abdalla Ali Urol Res Pract Review OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the comparative efficacy and safety between on-clamp and off-clamp partial nephrectomy in patients with renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was pre-registered on The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022339127). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. A manual search was also conducted to avoid missing relevant studies. All observational and experimental studies reporting the comparative efficacy and/or safety of on-clamp versus off-clamp partial nephrectomy were included. Outcomes were divided into 3 categories: perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and revised Cochrane ROB-II tool for nonrandomized and randomized studies, respectively. Fixed- and random-effect models were implemented to pool the mean difference and log odds ratio of continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine if the effect size was driven by a single study, and Egger’s regression test was used to assess publication bias. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were meta-analyzed. The on-clamping method showed greater benefit when compared to the off-clamping technique in terms of perioperative (estimated blood loss and blood transfusion), functional (estimated glomerular filtration rate), and oncologic outcomes (tumor resection time). However, it is associated with higher risk for complications. Most studies were of moderate-to-serious risk of bias. CONCLUSION: On-clamping shows superiority in terms of estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and tumor resection time. However, it is associated with increased risk of complications. The selection of the technique should be tailored per individual case based on their comorbidities and preoperative risk profile. Turkish Association of Urology 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10192728/ /pubmed/37877854 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22207 Text en 2023 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Review
Serag, Hosam
Agag, Ayman
Naushad, Naufal
Mukherjee, Ankur
Harrington-Vogt, Maria
Deb, Abdalla Ali
Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of On-Clamp Versus Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis of 9027 Patients
title Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of On-Clamp Versus Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis of 9027 Patients
title_full Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of On-Clamp Versus Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis of 9027 Patients
title_fullStr Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of On-Clamp Versus Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis of 9027 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of On-Clamp Versus Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis of 9027 Patients
title_short Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of On-Clamp Versus Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis of 9027 Patients
title_sort perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of on-clamp versus off-clamp partial nephrectomy: an updated meta-analysis of 9027 patients
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37877854
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2023.22207
work_keys_str_mv AT seraghosam perioperativefunctionalandoncologicoutcomesofonclampversusoffclamppartialnephrectomyanupdatedmetaanalysisof9027patients
AT agagayman perioperativefunctionalandoncologicoutcomesofonclampversusoffclamppartialnephrectomyanupdatedmetaanalysisof9027patients
AT naushadnaufal perioperativefunctionalandoncologicoutcomesofonclampversusoffclamppartialnephrectomyanupdatedmetaanalysisof9027patients
AT mukherjeeankur perioperativefunctionalandoncologicoutcomesofonclampversusoffclamppartialnephrectomyanupdatedmetaanalysisof9027patients
AT harringtonvogtmaria perioperativefunctionalandoncologicoutcomesofonclampversusoffclamppartialnephrectomyanupdatedmetaanalysisof9027patients
AT debabdallaali perioperativefunctionalandoncologicoutcomesofonclampversusoffclamppartialnephrectomyanupdatedmetaanalysisof9027patients