Cargando…

Anterior Sphincter-sparing Suturing of the Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

BACKGROUND: Continence is an important functional outcome after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP), and modifications of the surgical technique may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate a novel RARP technique and to describe the observed continence outcomes. DESIGN, SETT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antonelli, Luca, Afferi, Luca, Mattei, Agostino, Fankhauser, Christian Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10192927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.007
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Continence is an important functional outcome after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP), and modifications of the surgical technique may improve outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate a novel RARP technique and to describe the observed continence outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study of men treated with RARP between 2017 and 2021 was conducted. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: During RARP, periprostatic structures are preserved, the intraprostatic urethra is partially spared, and the anterior anastomosis stitches involve the plexus structures but not the anterior urethra. MEASUREMENTS: A descriptive analysis of the pathological, functional, and short-term oncological outcomes was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 640 men, 448 (70%) with at least 1 yr of follow-up and a median age of 66 yr were included. The median operative time was 270 min and the prostatic volume 52 ml. The transurethral catheter was removed after a median of 3 d, and leakage of urine in the first 24 h after catheter removal was observed in 66/448 patients (15%). Positive surgical margins were reported in 104/448 (23%). Prostate-specific antigen persistence after prostatectomy was observed in 26/448 (6%). During a median follow-up of 2 yr (interquartile range 1–3 yr), the biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy was observed in 19/448 patients (4%). One year after prostatectomy, 406/448 patients (91%) were continent and required no pad at all, while 42/448 (9%) required at least one pad per day. CONCLUSIONS: Not stitching the anterior urethra is a novel technical modification and may improve continence outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: We describe a novel way to stitch the bladder neck to the urethra after removal of the prostate using a surgical robotic system. Our technique appeared safe, with promising urinary continence results.