Cargando…
What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications
INTRODUCTION: It is known that only a limited proportion of developed clinical prediction models (CPMs) are implemented and/or used in clinical practice. This may result in a large amount of research waste, even when considering that some CPMs may demonstrate poor performance. Cross-sectional estima...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073174 |
_version_ | 1785043761681661952 |
---|---|
author | Arshi, Banafsheh Wynants, Laure Rijnhart, Eline Reeve, Kelly Cowley, Laura Elizabeth Smits, Luc J |
author_facet | Arshi, Banafsheh Wynants, Laure Rijnhart, Eline Reeve, Kelly Cowley, Laura Elizabeth Smits, Luc J |
author_sort | Arshi, Banafsheh |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: It is known that only a limited proportion of developed clinical prediction models (CPMs) are implemented and/or used in clinical practice. This may result in a large amount of research waste, even when considering that some CPMs may demonstrate poor performance. Cross-sectional estimates of the numbers of CPMs that have been developed, validated, evaluated for impact or utilized in practice, have been made in specific medical fields, but studies across multiple fields and studies following up the fate of CPMs are lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have conducted a systematic search for prediction model studies published between January 1995 and December 2020 using the Pubmed and Embase databases, applying a validated search strategy. Taking random samples for every calendar year, abstracts and articles were screened until a target of 100 CPM development studies were identified. Next, we will perform a forward citation search of the resulting CPM development article cohort to identify articles on external validation, impact assessment or implementation of those CPMs. We will also invite the authors of the development studies to complete an online survey to track implementation and clinical utilization of the CPMs. We will conduct a descriptive synthesis of the included studies, using data from the forward citation search and online survey to quantify the proportion of developed models that are validated, assessed for their impact, implemented and/or used in patient care. We will conduct time-to-event analysis using Kaplan-Meier plots. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No patient data are involved in the research. Most information will be extracted from published articles. We request written informed consent from the survey respondents. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. OSF REGISTRATION: (https://osf.io/nj8s9). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10193067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101930672023-05-19 What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications Arshi, Banafsheh Wynants, Laure Rijnhart, Eline Reeve, Kelly Cowley, Laura Elizabeth Smits, Luc J BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: It is known that only a limited proportion of developed clinical prediction models (CPMs) are implemented and/or used in clinical practice. This may result in a large amount of research waste, even when considering that some CPMs may demonstrate poor performance. Cross-sectional estimates of the numbers of CPMs that have been developed, validated, evaluated for impact or utilized in practice, have been made in specific medical fields, but studies across multiple fields and studies following up the fate of CPMs are lacking. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have conducted a systematic search for prediction model studies published between January 1995 and December 2020 using the Pubmed and Embase databases, applying a validated search strategy. Taking random samples for every calendar year, abstracts and articles were screened until a target of 100 CPM development studies were identified. Next, we will perform a forward citation search of the resulting CPM development article cohort to identify articles on external validation, impact assessment or implementation of those CPMs. We will also invite the authors of the development studies to complete an online survey to track implementation and clinical utilization of the CPMs. We will conduct a descriptive synthesis of the included studies, using data from the forward citation search and online survey to quantify the proportion of developed models that are validated, assessed for their impact, implemented and/or used in patient care. We will conduct time-to-event analysis using Kaplan-Meier plots. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No patient data are involved in the research. Most information will be extracted from published articles. We request written informed consent from the survey respondents. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. OSF REGISTRATION: (https://osf.io/nj8s9). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10193067/ /pubmed/37197813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073174 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Arshi, Banafsheh Wynants, Laure Rijnhart, Eline Reeve, Kelly Cowley, Laura Elizabeth Smits, Luc J What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications |
title | What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications |
title_full | What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications |
title_fullStr | What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications |
title_full_unstemmed | What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications |
title_short | What proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? Protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications |
title_sort | what proportion of clinical prediction models make it to clinical practice? protocol for a two-track follow-up study of prediction model development publications |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37197813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073174 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arshibanafsheh whatproportionofclinicalpredictionmodelsmakeittoclinicalpracticeprotocolforatwotrackfollowupstudyofpredictionmodeldevelopmentpublications AT wynantslaure whatproportionofclinicalpredictionmodelsmakeittoclinicalpracticeprotocolforatwotrackfollowupstudyofpredictionmodeldevelopmentpublications AT rijnharteline whatproportionofclinicalpredictionmodelsmakeittoclinicalpracticeprotocolforatwotrackfollowupstudyofpredictionmodeldevelopmentpublications AT reevekelly whatproportionofclinicalpredictionmodelsmakeittoclinicalpracticeprotocolforatwotrackfollowupstudyofpredictionmodeldevelopmentpublications AT cowleylauraelizabeth whatproportionofclinicalpredictionmodelsmakeittoclinicalpracticeprotocolforatwotrackfollowupstudyofpredictionmodeldevelopmentpublications AT smitslucj whatproportionofclinicalpredictionmodelsmakeittoclinicalpracticeprotocolforatwotrackfollowupstudyofpredictionmodeldevelopmentpublications |