Cargando…
A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study
BACKGROUND: One challenge in the field of in-vitro fertilisation is the selection of the most viable embryos for transfer. Morphological quality assessment and morphokinetic analysis both have the disadvantage of intra-observer and inter-observer variability. A third method, preimplantation genetic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36543475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00213-8 |
_version_ | 1785043774669324288 |
---|---|
author | Barnes, Josue Brendel, Matthew Gao, Vianne R Rajendran, Suraj Kim, Junbum Li, Qianzi Malmsten, Jonas E Sierra, Jose T Zisimopoulos, Pantelis Sigaras, Alexandros Khosravi, Pegah Meseguer, Marcos Zhan, Qiansheng Rosenwaks, Zev Elemento, Olivier Zaninovic, Nikica Hajirasouliha, Iman |
author_facet | Barnes, Josue Brendel, Matthew Gao, Vianne R Rajendran, Suraj Kim, Junbum Li, Qianzi Malmsten, Jonas E Sierra, Jose T Zisimopoulos, Pantelis Sigaras, Alexandros Khosravi, Pegah Meseguer, Marcos Zhan, Qiansheng Rosenwaks, Zev Elemento, Olivier Zaninovic, Nikica Hajirasouliha, Iman |
author_sort | Barnes, Josue |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: One challenge in the field of in-vitro fertilisation is the selection of the most viable embryos for transfer. Morphological quality assessment and morphokinetic analysis both have the disadvantage of intra-observer and inter-observer variability. A third method, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), has limitations too, including its invasiveness and cost. We hypothesised that differences in aneuploid and euploid embryos that allow for model-based classification are reflected in morphology, morphokinetics, and associated clinical information. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we used machine-learning and deep-learning approaches to develop STORK-A, a non-invasive and automated method of embryo evaluation that uses artificial intelligence to predict embryo ploidy status. Our method used a dataset of 10 378 embryos that consisted of static images captured at 110 h after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, morphokinetic parameters, blastocyst morphological assessments, maternal age, and ploidy status. Independent and external datasets, Weill Cornell Medicine EmbryoScope+ (WCM-ES+; Weill Cornell Medicine Center of Reproductive Medicine, NY, USA) and IVI Valencia (IVI Valencia, Health Research Institute la Fe, Valencia, Spain) were used to test the generalisability of STORK-A and were compared measuring accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). FINDINGS: Analysis and model development included the use of 10 378 embryos, all with PGT-A results, from 1385 patients (maternal age range 21–48 years; mean age 36·98 years [SD 4·62]). STORK-A predicted aneuploid versus euploid embryos with an accuracy of 69·3% (95% CI 66·9–71·5; AUC 0·761; positive predictive value [PPV] 76·1%; negative predictive value [NPV] 62·1%) when using images, maternal age, morphokinetics, and blastocyst score. A second classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy and single aneuploidy produced an accuracy of 74·0% (95% CI 71·7–76·1; AUC 0·760; PPV 54·9%; NPV 87·6%) using an image, maternal age, morphokinetic parameters, and blastocyst grade. A third classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy had an accuracy of 77·6% (95% CI 75·0–80·0; AUC 0·847; PPV 76·7%; NPV 78·0%). STORK-A reported accuracies of 63·4% (AUC 0·702) on the WCM-ES+ dataset and 65·7% (AUC 0·715) on the IVI Valencia dataset, when using an image, maternal age, and morphokinetic parameters, similar to the STORK-A test dataset accuracy of 67·8% (AUC 0·737), showing generalisability. INTERPRETATION: As a proof of concept, STORK-A shows an ability to predict embryo ploidy in a non-invasive manner and shows future potential as a standardised supplementation to traditional methods of embryo selection and prioritisation for implantation or recommendation for PGT-A. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10193126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101931262023-05-18 A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study Barnes, Josue Brendel, Matthew Gao, Vianne R Rajendran, Suraj Kim, Junbum Li, Qianzi Malmsten, Jonas E Sierra, Jose T Zisimopoulos, Pantelis Sigaras, Alexandros Khosravi, Pegah Meseguer, Marcos Zhan, Qiansheng Rosenwaks, Zev Elemento, Olivier Zaninovic, Nikica Hajirasouliha, Iman Lancet Digit Health Article BACKGROUND: One challenge in the field of in-vitro fertilisation is the selection of the most viable embryos for transfer. Morphological quality assessment and morphokinetic analysis both have the disadvantage of intra-observer and inter-observer variability. A third method, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), has limitations too, including its invasiveness and cost. We hypothesised that differences in aneuploid and euploid embryos that allow for model-based classification are reflected in morphology, morphokinetics, and associated clinical information. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we used machine-learning and deep-learning approaches to develop STORK-A, a non-invasive and automated method of embryo evaluation that uses artificial intelligence to predict embryo ploidy status. Our method used a dataset of 10 378 embryos that consisted of static images captured at 110 h after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, morphokinetic parameters, blastocyst morphological assessments, maternal age, and ploidy status. Independent and external datasets, Weill Cornell Medicine EmbryoScope+ (WCM-ES+; Weill Cornell Medicine Center of Reproductive Medicine, NY, USA) and IVI Valencia (IVI Valencia, Health Research Institute la Fe, Valencia, Spain) were used to test the generalisability of STORK-A and were compared measuring accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). FINDINGS: Analysis and model development included the use of 10 378 embryos, all with PGT-A results, from 1385 patients (maternal age range 21–48 years; mean age 36·98 years [SD 4·62]). STORK-A predicted aneuploid versus euploid embryos with an accuracy of 69·3% (95% CI 66·9–71·5; AUC 0·761; positive predictive value [PPV] 76·1%; negative predictive value [NPV] 62·1%) when using images, maternal age, morphokinetics, and blastocyst score. A second classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy and single aneuploidy produced an accuracy of 74·0% (95% CI 71·7–76·1; AUC 0·760; PPV 54·9%; NPV 87·6%) using an image, maternal age, morphokinetic parameters, and blastocyst grade. A third classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy had an accuracy of 77·6% (95% CI 75·0–80·0; AUC 0·847; PPV 76·7%; NPV 78·0%). STORK-A reported accuracies of 63·4% (AUC 0·702) on the WCM-ES+ dataset and 65·7% (AUC 0·715) on the IVI Valencia dataset, when using an image, maternal age, and morphokinetic parameters, similar to the STORK-A test dataset accuracy of 67·8% (AUC 0·737), showing generalisability. INTERPRETATION: As a proof of concept, STORK-A shows an ability to predict embryo ploidy in a non-invasive manner and shows future potential as a standardised supplementation to traditional methods of embryo selection and prioritisation for implantation or recommendation for PGT-A. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health. 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10193126/ /pubmed/36543475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00213-8 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. |
spellingShingle | Article Barnes, Josue Brendel, Matthew Gao, Vianne R Rajendran, Suraj Kim, Junbum Li, Qianzi Malmsten, Jonas E Sierra, Jose T Zisimopoulos, Pantelis Sigaras, Alexandros Khosravi, Pegah Meseguer, Marcos Zhan, Qiansheng Rosenwaks, Zev Elemento, Olivier Zaninovic, Nikica Hajirasouliha, Iman A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study |
title | A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study |
title_full | A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study |
title_fullStr | A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study |
title_full_unstemmed | A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study |
title_short | A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study |
title_sort | non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: a retrospective model development and validation study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36543475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00213-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barnesjosue anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT brendelmatthew anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT gaovianner anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT rajendransuraj anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT kimjunbum anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT liqianzi anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT malmstenjonase anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT sierrajoset anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT zisimopoulospantelis anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT sigarasalexandros anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT khosravipegah anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT meseguermarcos anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT zhanqiansheng anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT rosenwakszev anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT elementoolivier anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT zaninovicnikica anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT hajirasoulihaiman anoninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT barnesjosue noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT brendelmatthew noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT gaovianner noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT rajendransuraj noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT kimjunbum noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT liqianzi noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT malmstenjonase noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT sierrajoset noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT zisimopoulospantelis noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT sigarasalexandros noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT khosravipegah noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT meseguermarcos noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT zhanqiansheng noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT rosenwakszev noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT elementoolivier noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT zaninovicnikica noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy AT hajirasoulihaiman noninvasiveartificialintelligenceapproachforthepredictionofhumanblastocystploidyaretrospectivemodeldevelopmentandvalidationstudy |