Cargando…
High levels of interest in access to free safer smoking equipment to reduce injection frequency among people who inject drugs in Seattle, Washington
BACKGROUND: Drug use route transition interventions promote safer consumption by facilitating a switch from injection to safer routes such as smoking or oral consumption. METHODS: We performed a descriptive analysis using data from questions about “free, clean equipment for smoking” heroin, methamph...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100163 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Drug use route transition interventions promote safer consumption by facilitating a switch from injection to safer routes such as smoking or oral consumption. METHODS: We performed a descriptive analysis using data from questions about “free, clean equipment for smoking” heroin, methamphetamine and/or crack from the Seattle 2018 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance survey of people who inject drugs (N = 555). We estimated the proportion of respondents with access to free safer smoking equipment, and among these participants, the proportion who reported that this access reduced their injection frequency. Among respondents without access to free safer smoking equipment, we described the proportion who were interested in getting access, and whether they thought this access would reduce their injection frequency. RESULTS: Among participants who reported prior year heroin (n = 495), methamphetamine (n = 372), or crack (n = 88) injection, 11%, 11% and 12% reported access to free safer smoking equipment, respectively. Of those with access, the proportion that reported that access reduced their injection frequency ranged from 12% to 44%. Among participants without access, 28% who used heroin, 45% who used methamphetamine, and 49% who used crack were interested in access. Of interested participants, a majority reported that they thought this access would reduce their frequency of injection. CONCLUSIONS: Access to free safer smoking equipment was limited. Many participants were interested in getting free safer smoking equipment and reported that this access may reduce their injection frequency. Safer smoking equipment is a harm reduction strategy that should be available to reduce risks from opioid and stimulant injection. |
---|