Cargando…
Are COVID-19 systematic reviews up to date and can we tell? A cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 led to a rapid acceleration in the number of systematic reviews. Readers need to know how up to date evidence is when selecting reviews to inform decisions. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate how easily the currency of COVID-19 systematic reviews published early in the...
Autores principales: | McDonald, Steve, Turner, Simon L., Nguyen, Phi-Yen, Page, Matthew J., Turner, Tari |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193307/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02253-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Most published systematic reviews of remdesivir for COVID-19 were redundant and lacked currency
por: McDonald, Steve, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Gene–Environment Interactions—What Can These Tell Us about the Relationship between Asthma and Allergy?
por: Turner, Steve
Publicado: (2017) -
Commentary: we can tell where it hurts, but can we tell where the pain is coming from or where we should manipulate?
por: Brady, O’Dane, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Editorial: Asthma in Children and Adults – What Are the Differences and What Can They Tell Us About Asthma?
por: Turner, Steve, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison
por: Shamseer, Larissa, et al.
Publicado: (2017)