Cargando…

Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study

OBJECTIVE: Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Timothy R., Foley, Kevin T., Boruah, Sourabh, Slotkin, Jonathan R., Woodard, Eric, Lazor, John B., Cavaleri, Christy, Brown, Michael C., McDonough, Brittany, Hess, Brian, Van Citters, Douglas W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association of Neurological Surgeons 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2022.10.JNS221657
_version_ 1785043841132265472
author Smith, Timothy R.
Foley, Kevin T.
Boruah, Sourabh
Slotkin, Jonathan R.
Woodard, Eric
Lazor, John B.
Cavaleri, Christy
Brown, Michael C.
McDonough, Brittany
Hess, Brian
Van Citters, Douglas W.
author_facet Smith, Timothy R.
Foley, Kevin T.
Boruah, Sourabh
Slotkin, Jonathan R.
Woodard, Eric
Lazor, John B.
Cavaleri, Christy
Brown, Michael C.
McDonough, Brittany
Hess, Brian
Van Citters, Douglas W.
author_sort Smith, Timothy R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deformity, wound infection/dehiscence, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel mineral-organic bone adhesive (Tetranite) for cranial bone flap fixation. METHODS: Craniotomy bone flaps created in human cadaveric skulls were tested under quasistatic and impact loading in the following conditions: 1) uncut skull; 2) bone flaps fixated with TPS alone; and 3) bone flaps fixated with bone adhesive alone. All fixative surgical procedures were performed by a group of 16 neurosurgeons in a simulated surgical environment. The position of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps was measured using computed tomography and compared with their original native location. The resistance of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps to simulated CSF leakage was also evaluated. Because there was a gap around the circumference of the TPS-fixated specimens that was visible to the naked eye, pressurized CSF leak testing was not attempted on them. RESULTS: Adhesive-fixated bone flaps showed significantly stiffer and stronger quasistatic responses than TPS-fixated specimens. The strength and stiffness of the adhesive-fixated specimens were not significantly different from those of the uncut native skulls. Total and plastic deflections under 6-J impact were significantly less for adhesive-fixed bone flaps than TPS. There were no significant differences in any subthreshold impact metrics between the adhesive-fixed and native specimens at both 6-J and 12-J impact levels, with 1 exception. Plastic deflection at 6-J impact was significantly less in adhesive-fixated bone flaps than in native specimens. The energy to failure of the adhesive-fixated specimens was not significantly different from that of the native specimens. Time since fixation (20 minutes vs 10 days) did not significantly affect the impact failure properties of the adhesive-fixated specimens. Of the 16 adhesive-fixated craniotomy specimens tested, 14 did not leak at pressures as high as 40 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The neurosurgeons in this study had no prior exposure or experience with the bone adhesive. Despite this, improved resistance to CSF egress, superior mechanical properties, and better cosmetic outcomes were demonstrated with bone adhesive compared with TPS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10193477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Association of Neurological Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101934772023-06-08 Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study Smith, Timothy R. Foley, Kevin T. Boruah, Sourabh Slotkin, Jonathan R. Woodard, Eric Lazor, John B. Cavaleri, Christy Brown, Michael C. McDonough, Brittany Hess, Brian Van Citters, Douglas W. J Neurosurg Laboratory Investigation OBJECTIVE: Titanium plates and screws (TPS) are the current standard of care for fixation of cranial bone flaps. These materials have been used for decades but have known potential complications, including flap migration, bone resorption/incomplete osseous union, hardware protrusion, cosmetic deformity, wound infection/dehiscence, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel mineral-organic bone adhesive (Tetranite) for cranial bone flap fixation. METHODS: Craniotomy bone flaps created in human cadaveric skulls were tested under quasistatic and impact loading in the following conditions: 1) uncut skull; 2) bone flaps fixated with TPS alone; and 3) bone flaps fixated with bone adhesive alone. All fixative surgical procedures were performed by a group of 16 neurosurgeons in a simulated surgical environment. The position of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps was measured using computed tomography and compared with their original native location. The resistance of adhesive-fixated cranial bone flaps to simulated CSF leakage was also evaluated. Because there was a gap around the circumference of the TPS-fixated specimens that was visible to the naked eye, pressurized CSF leak testing was not attempted on them. RESULTS: Adhesive-fixated bone flaps showed significantly stiffer and stronger quasistatic responses than TPS-fixated specimens. The strength and stiffness of the adhesive-fixated specimens were not significantly different from those of the uncut native skulls. Total and plastic deflections under 6-J impact were significantly less for adhesive-fixed bone flaps than TPS. There were no significant differences in any subthreshold impact metrics between the adhesive-fixed and native specimens at both 6-J and 12-J impact levels, with 1 exception. Plastic deflection at 6-J impact was significantly less in adhesive-fixated bone flaps than in native specimens. The energy to failure of the adhesive-fixated specimens was not significantly different from that of the native specimens. Time since fixation (20 minutes vs 10 days) did not significantly affect the impact failure properties of the adhesive-fixated specimens. Of the 16 adhesive-fixated craniotomy specimens tested, 14 did not leak at pressures as high as 40 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The neurosurgeons in this study had no prior exposure or experience with the bone adhesive. Despite this, improved resistance to CSF egress, superior mechanical properties, and better cosmetic outcomes were demonstrated with bone adhesive compared with TPS. American Association of Neurological Surgeons 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10193477/ /pubmed/36681962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2022.10.JNS221657 Text en © 2022 The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ).
spellingShingle Laboratory Investigation
Smith, Timothy R.
Foley, Kevin T.
Boruah, Sourabh
Slotkin, Jonathan R.
Woodard, Eric
Lazor, John B.
Cavaleri, Christy
Brown, Michael C.
McDonough, Brittany
Hess, Brian
Van Citters, Douglas W.
Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study
title Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study
title_full Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study
title_fullStr Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study
title_full_unstemmed Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study
title_short Use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study
title_sort use of adhesive cranial bone flap fixation without hardware to improve mechanical strength, resist cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and maintain anatomical alignment: a laboratory study
topic Laboratory Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36681962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2022.10.JNS221657
work_keys_str_mv AT smithtimothyr useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT foleykevint useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT boruahsourabh useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT slotkinjonathanr useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT woodarderic useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT lazorjohnb useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT cavalerichristy useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT brownmichaelc useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT mcdonoughbrittany useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT hessbrian useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy
AT vancittersdouglasw useofadhesivecranialboneflapfixationwithouthardwaretoimprovemechanicalstrengthresistcerebrospinalfluidleakageandmaintainanatomicalalignmentalaboratorystudy