Cargando…
Investigation of interest in and timing preference for cancer predisposition testing and expanded carrier screening among women of reproductive age
OBJECTIVE: To examine cognitive, relational, and social predictors of interest in and timing preference for cancer predisposition testing (CPT) and expanded carrier screening (ECS) offered in routine gynecologic care for women of reproductive age. METHODS: Women between 20 and 35 years old who were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100128 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVE: To examine cognitive, relational, and social predictors of interest in and timing preference for cancer predisposition testing (CPT) and expanded carrier screening (ECS) offered in routine gynecologic care for women of reproductive age. METHODS: Women between 20 and 35 years old who were currently pregnant or had a prior pregnancy (N = 351) completed an online survey. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to identify significant predictors of women’s interest in and timing preference for CPT and ECS. RESULTS: Most respondents reported high interest in CPT and ECS and preferred to have them when planning for a pregnancy. Perceived importance of genetic information and negative attitude towards uncertainty predicted interest in CPT and ECS in multivariable models. Genetic knowledge predicted preference for CPT or ECS when planning for a pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Educational and decision support tools should be developed to enhance women’s knowledge and awareness of CPT and ECS and to provide them with strategies to manage uncertainty. INNOVATION: We examined women’s timing preference for CPT and ECS and the impact of partner support and trust with gynecologist. A context-specific attitudes toward uncertainty scale was used to investigate women’s particular perceptions of uncertainty in genetic testing. |
---|