Cargando…

One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers

OBJECTIVE: Telephone health services is an increasing and integral part of health care in several countries. Callers who call repeatedly, in the current study “frequent callers” are present in all kinds of healthcare services, often constitute a considerable proportion of the total amount of calls a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skogevall, S., Kaminsky, E., Håkansson, J., Holmström, I.K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100070
_version_ 1785043975936147456
author Skogevall, S.
Kaminsky, E.
Håkansson, J.
Holmström, I.K.
author_facet Skogevall, S.
Kaminsky, E.
Håkansson, J.
Holmström, I.K.
author_sort Skogevall, S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Telephone health services is an increasing and integral part of health care in several countries. Callers who call repeatedly, in the current study “frequent callers” are present in all kinds of healthcare services, often constitute a considerable proportion of the total amount of calls and are complicated to help. The aim was to provide a comprehensive overview of research on frequent callers at a variety of telephone health services. METHODS: An integrative literature review. Literature was searched for the period 2011–2020 in CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, and PubMed, and resulted in the inclusion of 20 articles. RESULTS: Studies on frequent callers (FCs) were found in the context of emergency medical services, telephone helplines, primary healthcare, and specialist medicine clinics. Frequent calling was associated with psychiatric comorbidity, and the reasons for calling were often multifaceted. CONCLUSION: The strategies suggested for handling calls involved an individual approach, which could be enabled through multidisciplinary work. INNOVATION: The main findings indicate a need for a systematic approach and guidelines to enable optimal help for FCs. Cooperation among healthcare instances seems to contribute to a more individual care for FCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10194234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101942342023-05-19 One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers Skogevall, S. Kaminsky, E. Håkansson, J. Holmström, I.K. PEC Innov Full length article OBJECTIVE: Telephone health services is an increasing and integral part of health care in several countries. Callers who call repeatedly, in the current study “frequent callers” are present in all kinds of healthcare services, often constitute a considerable proportion of the total amount of calls and are complicated to help. The aim was to provide a comprehensive overview of research on frequent callers at a variety of telephone health services. METHODS: An integrative literature review. Literature was searched for the period 2011–2020 in CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycInfo, and PubMed, and resulted in the inclusion of 20 articles. RESULTS: Studies on frequent callers (FCs) were found in the context of emergency medical services, telephone helplines, primary healthcare, and specialist medicine clinics. Frequent calling was associated with psychiatric comorbidity, and the reasons for calling were often multifaceted. CONCLUSION: The strategies suggested for handling calls involved an individual approach, which could be enabled through multidisciplinary work. INNOVATION: The main findings indicate a need for a systematic approach and guidelines to enable optimal help for FCs. Cooperation among healthcare instances seems to contribute to a more individual care for FCs. Elsevier 2022-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10194234/ /pubmed/37213782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100070 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full length article
Skogevall, S.
Kaminsky, E.
Håkansson, J.
Holmström, I.K.
One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers
title One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers
title_full One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers
title_fullStr One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers
title_full_unstemmed One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers
title_short One for all or all for one? An integrative review of research on frequent callers
title_sort one for all or all for one? an integrative review of research on frequent callers
topic Full length article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100070
work_keys_str_mv AT skogevalls oneforallorallforoneanintegrativereviewofresearchonfrequentcallers
AT kaminskye oneforallorallforoneanintegrativereviewofresearchonfrequentcallers
AT hakanssonj oneforallorallforoneanintegrativereviewofresearchonfrequentcallers
AT holmstromik oneforallorallforoneanintegrativereviewofresearchonfrequentcallers