Cargando…
The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the CONTINUE study is to gather preliminary data on the potential impact of implementing a “Cost Tool” in routine obstetrics (OB) care. It is hypothesized that by providing prenatal patients with an ability to forecast their care plan, they would be better able to anticip...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136 |
_version_ | 1785043995618967552 |
---|---|
author | Fitzpatrick, Veronica Erwin, Kim Rivelli, Anne Shields, Maureen Delfinado, Leah Cabiya, Marie Wennerberg, Karen |
author_facet | Fitzpatrick, Veronica Erwin, Kim Rivelli, Anne Shields, Maureen Delfinado, Leah Cabiya, Marie Wennerberg, Karen |
author_sort | Fitzpatrick, Veronica |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of the CONTINUE study is to gather preliminary data on the potential impact of implementing a “Cost Tool” in routine obstetrics (OB) care. It is hypothesized that by providing prenatal patients with an ability to forecast their care plan, they would be better able to anticipate and plan for the costs associated with their prenatal care. METHODS: Pilot data from interviews and surveys were collected from 71 prenatal patients across three clinics throughout Chicago, IL. RESULTS: As compared to privately insured prenatal patients, prenatal patients with public insurance reported the most benefit in Cost Tool use. Specifically, that the Cost Tool helped to navigate insurance more effectively (OR 4.49, p=0.0254), see the "Big Picture" and link it to the family budget (OR 4.25, p=0.0099), and make the financial tradeoffs needed to get through pregnancy (OR 5.50, p=0.0305). CONCLUSION: The CONTINUE study provides preliminary signals of the Cost Tool’s potential to help publicly insured prenatal patients better navigate the costs associated with their care plan. INNOVATIONS: The CONTINUE study contributes valuable preliminary data about the utility of a cost tool in routine OB care, especially as it may benefit low-income prenatal patients navigate prenatal care better. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10194338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101943382023-05-19 The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study Fitzpatrick, Veronica Erwin, Kim Rivelli, Anne Shields, Maureen Delfinado, Leah Cabiya, Marie Wennerberg, Karen PEC Innov Full length article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the CONTINUE study is to gather preliminary data on the potential impact of implementing a “Cost Tool” in routine obstetrics (OB) care. It is hypothesized that by providing prenatal patients with an ability to forecast their care plan, they would be better able to anticipate and plan for the costs associated with their prenatal care. METHODS: Pilot data from interviews and surveys were collected from 71 prenatal patients across three clinics throughout Chicago, IL. RESULTS: As compared to privately insured prenatal patients, prenatal patients with public insurance reported the most benefit in Cost Tool use. Specifically, that the Cost Tool helped to navigate insurance more effectively (OR 4.49, p=0.0254), see the "Big Picture" and link it to the family budget (OR 4.25, p=0.0099), and make the financial tradeoffs needed to get through pregnancy (OR 5.50, p=0.0305). CONCLUSION: The CONTINUE study provides preliminary signals of the Cost Tool’s potential to help publicly insured prenatal patients better navigate the costs associated with their care plan. INNOVATIONS: The CONTINUE study contributes valuable preliminary data about the utility of a cost tool in routine OB care, especially as it may benefit low-income prenatal patients navigate prenatal care better. Elsevier 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10194338/ /pubmed/37214536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Full length article Fitzpatrick, Veronica Erwin, Kim Rivelli, Anne Shields, Maureen Delfinado, Leah Cabiya, Marie Wennerberg, Karen The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study |
title | The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study |
title_full | The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study |
title_fullStr | The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study |
title_short | The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study |
title_sort | potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine ob care: lessons from the continue pilot study |
topic | Full length article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194338/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitzpatrickveronica thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT erwinkim thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT rivellianne thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT shieldsmaureen thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT delfinadoleah thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT cabiyamarie thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT wennerbergkaren thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT fitzpatrickveronica potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT erwinkim potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT rivellianne potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT shieldsmaureen potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT delfinadoleah potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT cabiyamarie potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy AT wennerbergkaren potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy |