Cargando…

The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the CONTINUE study is to gather preliminary data on the potential impact of implementing a “Cost Tool” in routine obstetrics (OB) care. It is hypothesized that by providing prenatal patients with an ability to forecast their care plan, they would be better able to anticip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitzpatrick, Veronica, Erwin, Kim, Rivelli, Anne, Shields, Maureen, Delfinado, Leah, Cabiya, Marie, Wennerberg, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136
_version_ 1785043995618967552
author Fitzpatrick, Veronica
Erwin, Kim
Rivelli, Anne
Shields, Maureen
Delfinado, Leah
Cabiya, Marie
Wennerberg, Karen
author_facet Fitzpatrick, Veronica
Erwin, Kim
Rivelli, Anne
Shields, Maureen
Delfinado, Leah
Cabiya, Marie
Wennerberg, Karen
author_sort Fitzpatrick, Veronica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the CONTINUE study is to gather preliminary data on the potential impact of implementing a “Cost Tool” in routine obstetrics (OB) care. It is hypothesized that by providing prenatal patients with an ability to forecast their care plan, they would be better able to anticipate and plan for the costs associated with their prenatal care. METHODS: Pilot data from interviews and surveys were collected from 71 prenatal patients across three clinics throughout Chicago, IL. RESULTS: As compared to privately insured prenatal patients, prenatal patients with public insurance reported the most benefit in Cost Tool use. Specifically, that the Cost Tool helped to navigate insurance more effectively (OR 4.49, p=0.0254), see the "Big Picture" and link it to the family budget (OR 4.25, p=0.0099), and make the financial tradeoffs needed to get through pregnancy (OR 5.50, p=0.0305). CONCLUSION: The CONTINUE study provides preliminary signals of the Cost Tool’s potential to help publicly insured prenatal patients better navigate the costs associated with their care plan. INNOVATIONS: The CONTINUE study contributes valuable preliminary data about the utility of a cost tool in routine OB care, especially as it may benefit low-income prenatal patients navigate prenatal care better.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10194338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101943382023-05-19 The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study Fitzpatrick, Veronica Erwin, Kim Rivelli, Anne Shields, Maureen Delfinado, Leah Cabiya, Marie Wennerberg, Karen PEC Innov Full length article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the CONTINUE study is to gather preliminary data on the potential impact of implementing a “Cost Tool” in routine obstetrics (OB) care. It is hypothesized that by providing prenatal patients with an ability to forecast their care plan, they would be better able to anticipate and plan for the costs associated with their prenatal care. METHODS: Pilot data from interviews and surveys were collected from 71 prenatal patients across three clinics throughout Chicago, IL. RESULTS: As compared to privately insured prenatal patients, prenatal patients with public insurance reported the most benefit in Cost Tool use. Specifically, that the Cost Tool helped to navigate insurance more effectively (OR 4.49, p=0.0254), see the "Big Picture" and link it to the family budget (OR 4.25, p=0.0099), and make the financial tradeoffs needed to get through pregnancy (OR 5.50, p=0.0305). CONCLUSION: The CONTINUE study provides preliminary signals of the Cost Tool’s potential to help publicly insured prenatal patients better navigate the costs associated with their care plan. INNOVATIONS: The CONTINUE study contributes valuable preliminary data about the utility of a cost tool in routine OB care, especially as it may benefit low-income prenatal patients navigate prenatal care better. Elsevier 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10194338/ /pubmed/37214536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Full length article
Fitzpatrick, Veronica
Erwin, Kim
Rivelli, Anne
Shields, Maureen
Delfinado, Leah
Cabiya, Marie
Wennerberg, Karen
The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study
title The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study
title_full The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study
title_fullStr The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study
title_full_unstemmed The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study
title_short The potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine OB care: Lessons from the CONTINUE pilot study
title_sort potential impact of introducing a cost tool to facilitate cost-of-care conversations in routine ob care: lessons from the continue pilot study
topic Full length article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100136
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatrickveronica thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT erwinkim thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT rivellianne thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT shieldsmaureen thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT delfinadoleah thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT cabiyamarie thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT wennerbergkaren thepotentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT fitzpatrickveronica potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT erwinkim potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT rivellianne potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT shieldsmaureen potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT delfinadoleah potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT cabiyamarie potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy
AT wennerbergkaren potentialimpactofintroducingacosttooltofacilitatecostofcareconversationsinroutineobcarelessonsfromthecontinuepilotstudy