Cargando…
Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial
Administration of pegylated granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (peg-GCSF) 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy is usually recommended. Next-day administration (after 24 hours) resulted in fewer duration of grade (Gr) 4 chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and decreased severity of CIN than same-da...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37335745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033638 |
_version_ | 1785044017682055168 |
---|---|
author | Park, Kwonoh Jeon, Young-Kyung Kim, Jung Hoon Choi, Younak Kim, Jae-Joon Oh, Sang-Bo Oh, So Yeon Hong, Yun Jeong Huh, Seok Jae Kim, Ilhwan Shin, Seong Hoon |
author_facet | Park, Kwonoh Jeon, Young-Kyung Kim, Jung Hoon Choi, Younak Kim, Jae-Joon Oh, Sang-Bo Oh, So Yeon Hong, Yun Jeong Huh, Seok Jae Kim, Ilhwan Shin, Seong Hoon |
author_sort | Park, Kwonoh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Administration of pegylated granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (peg-GCSF) 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy is usually recommended. Next-day administration (after 24 hours) resulted in fewer duration of grade (Gr) 4 chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and decreased severity of CIN than same-day (within 4 hours). However, patients sometimes receive same-day Peg-GCSF for the sake of convenience. In addition, a few prior studies showed that the same-day method is comparable or superior to the next-day method in preventing CIN, especially in chemotherapy regimens that include day 1 myelosuppressive agents. Thus, we aim to verify the hypothesis that same-day administration of pegteograstim, a new formulation of peg-GCSF, is non-inferior to next-day administration in terms of Gr4 CIN duration. METHODS: This study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, investigator-initiated phase 3 study. Patients with adjuvant/neoadjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy comprising intensively myelosuppressive agents on day 1 (mFOLFIRINOX, ECb, EP, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOX) are enrolled. The patients are assigned to the same-day arm or the next-day arm in a 1:1 ratio. The randomizations are stratified according to number of patient CIN risk factors (1 vs ≥2), chemotherapy setting (perioperative vs palliative), and interval (2-week vs 3-week). In the same-day arm, pegteograstim 6 mg is subcutaneously injected within 4 hours after completion of chemotherapy. In the next-day arm, pegetograstim is injected at 24 to 36 hours post-chemotherapy. A complete blood count test is performed daily from day 5 to 9 during the cycle 1. The primary endpoint is duration of Gr4 CIN (cycle 1), and secondary endpoints include incidence of Gr 3 to 4 CIN (cycle 1), severity of CIN (cycle 1), time to recovery absolute neutrophil count 1000/μL (cycle 1), incidence of febrile neutropenia, incidence of CIN-related dose delay, and dose intensity. In order to verify non-inferiority of 0.6 days, we estimated a significance level of 5%, power of 80%, and drop-out rate of 15%. This results in the need for a total of 160 patients, 80 in each group. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10194448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101944482023-05-19 Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial Park, Kwonoh Jeon, Young-Kyung Kim, Jung Hoon Choi, Younak Kim, Jae-Joon Oh, Sang-Bo Oh, So Yeon Hong, Yun Jeong Huh, Seok Jae Kim, Ilhwan Shin, Seong Hoon Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 Administration of pegylated granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (peg-GCSF) 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy is usually recommended. Next-day administration (after 24 hours) resulted in fewer duration of grade (Gr) 4 chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and decreased severity of CIN than same-day (within 4 hours). However, patients sometimes receive same-day Peg-GCSF for the sake of convenience. In addition, a few prior studies showed that the same-day method is comparable or superior to the next-day method in preventing CIN, especially in chemotherapy regimens that include day 1 myelosuppressive agents. Thus, we aim to verify the hypothesis that same-day administration of pegteograstim, a new formulation of peg-GCSF, is non-inferior to next-day administration in terms of Gr4 CIN duration. METHODS: This study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, investigator-initiated phase 3 study. Patients with adjuvant/neoadjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy comprising intensively myelosuppressive agents on day 1 (mFOLFIRINOX, ECb, EP, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOX) are enrolled. The patients are assigned to the same-day arm or the next-day arm in a 1:1 ratio. The randomizations are stratified according to number of patient CIN risk factors (1 vs ≥2), chemotherapy setting (perioperative vs palliative), and interval (2-week vs 3-week). In the same-day arm, pegteograstim 6 mg is subcutaneously injected within 4 hours after completion of chemotherapy. In the next-day arm, pegetograstim is injected at 24 to 36 hours post-chemotherapy. A complete blood count test is performed daily from day 5 to 9 during the cycle 1. The primary endpoint is duration of Gr4 CIN (cycle 1), and secondary endpoints include incidence of Gr 3 to 4 CIN (cycle 1), severity of CIN (cycle 1), time to recovery absolute neutrophil count 1000/μL (cycle 1), incidence of febrile neutropenia, incidence of CIN-related dose delay, and dose intensity. In order to verify non-inferiority of 0.6 days, we estimated a significance level of 5%, power of 80%, and drop-out rate of 15%. This results in the need for a total of 160 patients, 80 in each group. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10194448/ /pubmed/37335745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033638 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | 5700 Park, Kwonoh Jeon, Young-Kyung Kim, Jung Hoon Choi, Younak Kim, Jae-Joon Oh, Sang-Bo Oh, So Yeon Hong, Yun Jeong Huh, Seok Jae Kim, Ilhwan Shin, Seong Hoon Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial |
title | Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial |
title_full | Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial |
title_short | Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: a randomized phase iii clinical trial |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37335745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000033638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkkwonoh comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT jeonyoungkyung comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT kimjunghoon comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT choiyounak comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT kimjaejoon comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT ohsangbo comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT ohsoyeon comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT hongyunjeong comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT huhseokjae comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT kimilhwan comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial AT shinseonghoon comparisonofprophylacticeffectsforchemotherapyinducedneutropeniabetweensamedayversusnextdayadministrationofpegteograstimneurapeginpatientstreatedwithchemotherapyregimencomposedofday1intensivemyleosuppressiveagentarandomizedphaseiiiclinicaltrial |