Cargando…
Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting
OBJECTIVE: To explore attitudes toward tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap), influenza, and COVID vaccines among English- and Spanish- speaking pregnant individuals in a safety net setting. METHODS: Pregnant people aged 18 years or older were recruited from outpatient clinics between August...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2023.04.003 |
_version_ | 1785044094283677696 |
---|---|
author | Zimmerman, Margaux Zapata, Lesly P. Bachiller, Karla Devera, Jean L. Hall, Taylor A. Casey, Sharon M. Pierre-Joseph, Natalie Perkins, Rebecca B. |
author_facet | Zimmerman, Margaux Zapata, Lesly P. Bachiller, Karla Devera, Jean L. Hall, Taylor A. Casey, Sharon M. Pierre-Joseph, Natalie Perkins, Rebecca B. |
author_sort | Zimmerman, Margaux |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To explore attitudes toward tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap), influenza, and COVID vaccines among English- and Spanish- speaking pregnant individuals in a safety net setting. METHODS: Pregnant people aged 18 years or older were recruited from outpatient clinics between August 2020 and June 2021. Interviews were conducted via phone in English or Spanish, recorded, transcribed, and translated verbatim. Data were qualitatively analyzed using modified grounded theory and content analysis. RESULTS: 42 patients participated (22 English-speaking, 20 Spanish-speaking). Most participants expressed positive attitudes towards both routine prenatal vaccinations and COVID-19 vaccines, endorsing the belief that vaccines promote health and considering vaccines a social norm. Positive attitudes were similar for the three vaccines, and among Spanish- and English-speaking individuals. Participants trusted their healthcare provider's recommendations and felt comfortable receiving booster doses of vaccines they had received successfully in the past. Vaccine concerns differed by each vaccine. Despite limited knowledge, few participants expressed concerns about Tdap vaccines. Concerns around influenza vaccines often stemmed from personal experience and centered around ineffectiveness and increased risk of flu-like illnesses. Participants expressed the most concerns related to COVID vaccinations, including misinformation about serious side effects and distrust around accelerated approval of the vaccines. Many participants wished to know more about the side effects and safety of vaccinating during pregnancy, especially regarding the fetus's health. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants supported routine prenatal vaccinations, including COVID vaccines. Clinicians are trusted information sources and can help reinforce positive attitudes and social norms of receiving vaccinations in pregnancy while addressing vaccine-specific concerns. FUNDING: This work was supported by Suzanne Cutler Vaccination Education & Research Fund at the Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine for funding and support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10194813 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | National Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101948132023-05-19 Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting Zimmerman, Margaux Zapata, Lesly P. Bachiller, Karla Devera, Jean L. Hall, Taylor A. Casey, Sharon M. Pierre-Joseph, Natalie Perkins, Rebecca B. J Natl Med Assoc Article OBJECTIVE: To explore attitudes toward tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap), influenza, and COVID vaccines among English- and Spanish- speaking pregnant individuals in a safety net setting. METHODS: Pregnant people aged 18 years or older were recruited from outpatient clinics between August 2020 and June 2021. Interviews were conducted via phone in English or Spanish, recorded, transcribed, and translated verbatim. Data were qualitatively analyzed using modified grounded theory and content analysis. RESULTS: 42 patients participated (22 English-speaking, 20 Spanish-speaking). Most participants expressed positive attitudes towards both routine prenatal vaccinations and COVID-19 vaccines, endorsing the belief that vaccines promote health and considering vaccines a social norm. Positive attitudes were similar for the three vaccines, and among Spanish- and English-speaking individuals. Participants trusted their healthcare provider's recommendations and felt comfortable receiving booster doses of vaccines they had received successfully in the past. Vaccine concerns differed by each vaccine. Despite limited knowledge, few participants expressed concerns about Tdap vaccines. Concerns around influenza vaccines often stemmed from personal experience and centered around ineffectiveness and increased risk of flu-like illnesses. Participants expressed the most concerns related to COVID vaccinations, including misinformation about serious side effects and distrust around accelerated approval of the vaccines. Many participants wished to know more about the side effects and safety of vaccinating during pregnancy, especially regarding the fetus's health. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants supported routine prenatal vaccinations, including COVID vaccines. Clinicians are trusted information sources and can help reinforce positive attitudes and social norms of receiving vaccinations in pregnancy while addressing vaccine-specific concerns. FUNDING: This work was supported by Suzanne Cutler Vaccination Education & Research Fund at the Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine for funding and support. National Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10194813/ /pubmed/37210252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2023.04.003 Text en © 2023 National Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Zimmerman, Margaux Zapata, Lesly P. Bachiller, Karla Devera, Jean L. Hall, Taylor A. Casey, Sharon M. Pierre-Joseph, Natalie Perkins, Rebecca B. Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting |
title | Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting |
title_full | Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting |
title_fullStr | Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting |
title_short | Comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting |
title_sort | comparison of attitudes toward routine maternal vaccines and covid-19 vaccines among pregnant patients in an urban safety-net setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194813/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2023.04.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zimmermanmargaux comparisonofattitudestowardroutinematernalvaccinesandcovid19vaccinesamongpregnantpatientsinanurbansafetynetsetting AT zapataleslyp comparisonofattitudestowardroutinematernalvaccinesandcovid19vaccinesamongpregnantpatientsinanurbansafetynetsetting AT bachillerkarla comparisonofattitudestowardroutinematernalvaccinesandcovid19vaccinesamongpregnantpatientsinanurbansafetynetsetting AT deverajeanl comparisonofattitudestowardroutinematernalvaccinesandcovid19vaccinesamongpregnantpatientsinanurbansafetynetsetting AT halltaylora comparisonofattitudestowardroutinematernalvaccinesandcovid19vaccinesamongpregnantpatientsinanurbansafetynetsetting AT caseysharonm comparisonofattitudestowardroutinematernalvaccinesandcovid19vaccinesamongpregnantpatientsinanurbansafetynetsetting AT pierrejosephnatalie comparisonofattitudestowardroutinematernalvaccinesandcovid19vaccinesamongpregnantpatientsinanurbansafetynetsetting AT perkinsrebeccab comparisonofattitudestowardroutinematernalvaccinesandcovid19vaccinesamongpregnantpatientsinanurbansafetynetsetting |