Cargando…

Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 10% of people with intellectual disability display aggressive challenging behaviour, usually due to unmet needs. There are a variety of interventions available, yet a scarcity of understanding about what mechanisms contribute to successful interventions. We explored how com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Royston, Rachel, Naughton, Stephen, Hassiotis, Angela, Jahoda, Andrew, Ali, Afia, Chauhan, Umesh, Cooper, Sally-Ann, Kouroupa, Athanasia, Steed, Liz, Strydom, Andre, Taggart, Laurence, Rapaport, Penny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37200247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285590
_version_ 1785044132082745344
author Royston, Rachel
Naughton, Stephen
Hassiotis, Angela
Jahoda, Andrew
Ali, Afia
Chauhan, Umesh
Cooper, Sally-Ann
Kouroupa, Athanasia
Steed, Liz
Strydom, Andre
Taggart, Laurence
Rapaport, Penny
author_facet Royston, Rachel
Naughton, Stephen
Hassiotis, Angela
Jahoda, Andrew
Ali, Afia
Chauhan, Umesh
Cooper, Sally-Ann
Kouroupa, Athanasia
Steed, Liz
Strydom, Andre
Taggart, Laurence
Rapaport, Penny
author_sort Royston, Rachel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Approximately 10% of people with intellectual disability display aggressive challenging behaviour, usually due to unmet needs. There are a variety of interventions available, yet a scarcity of understanding about what mechanisms contribute to successful interventions. We explored how complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour work in practice and what works for whom by developing programme theories through contexts-mechanism-outcome configurations. METHODS: This review followed modified rapid realist review methodology and RAMESES-II standards. Eligible papers reported on a range of population groups (intellectual disability, mental health, dementia, young people and adults) and settings (community and inpatient) to broaden the scope and available data for review. RESULTS: Five databases and grey literature were searched and a total of 59 studies were included. We developed three overarching domains comprising of 11 contexts-mechanism-outcome configurations; 1. Working with the person displaying aggressive challenging behaviour, 2. Relationships and team focused approaches and 3. Sustaining and embedding facilitating factors at team and systems levels. Mechanisms underlying the successful application of interventions included improving understanding, addressing unmet need, developing positive skills, enhancing carer compassion, and boosting staff self-efficacy and motivation. CONCLUSION: The review emphasises how interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour should be personalised and tailored to suit individual needs. Effective communication and trusting relationships between service users, carers, professionals, and within staff teams is essential to facilitate effective intervention delivery. Carer inclusion and service level buy-in supports the attainment of desired outcomes. Implications for policy, clinical practice and future directions are discussed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203055.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10194976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101949762023-05-19 Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations Royston, Rachel Naughton, Stephen Hassiotis, Angela Jahoda, Andrew Ali, Afia Chauhan, Umesh Cooper, Sally-Ann Kouroupa, Athanasia Steed, Liz Strydom, Andre Taggart, Laurence Rapaport, Penny PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Approximately 10% of people with intellectual disability display aggressive challenging behaviour, usually due to unmet needs. There are a variety of interventions available, yet a scarcity of understanding about what mechanisms contribute to successful interventions. We explored how complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour work in practice and what works for whom by developing programme theories through contexts-mechanism-outcome configurations. METHODS: This review followed modified rapid realist review methodology and RAMESES-II standards. Eligible papers reported on a range of population groups (intellectual disability, mental health, dementia, young people and adults) and settings (community and inpatient) to broaden the scope and available data for review. RESULTS: Five databases and grey literature were searched and a total of 59 studies were included. We developed three overarching domains comprising of 11 contexts-mechanism-outcome configurations; 1. Working with the person displaying aggressive challenging behaviour, 2. Relationships and team focused approaches and 3. Sustaining and embedding facilitating factors at team and systems levels. Mechanisms underlying the successful application of interventions included improving understanding, addressing unmet need, developing positive skills, enhancing carer compassion, and boosting staff self-efficacy and motivation. CONCLUSION: The review emphasises how interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour should be personalised and tailored to suit individual needs. Effective communication and trusting relationships between service users, carers, professionals, and within staff teams is essential to facilitate effective intervention delivery. Carer inclusion and service level buy-in supports the attainment of desired outcomes. Implications for policy, clinical practice and future directions are discussed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020203055. Public Library of Science 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10194976/ /pubmed/37200247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285590 Text en © 2023 Royston et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Royston, Rachel
Naughton, Stephen
Hassiotis, Angela
Jahoda, Andrew
Ali, Afia
Chauhan, Umesh
Cooper, Sally-Ann
Kouroupa, Athanasia
Steed, Liz
Strydom, Andre
Taggart, Laurence
Rapaport, Penny
Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations
title Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations
title_full Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations
title_fullStr Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations
title_full_unstemmed Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations
title_short Complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: A rapid realist review informed by multiple populations
title_sort complex interventions for aggressive challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: a rapid realist review informed by multiple populations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37200247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285590
work_keys_str_mv AT roystonrachel complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT naughtonstephen complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT hassiotisangela complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT jahodaandrew complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT aliafia complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT chauhanumesh complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT coopersallyann complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT kouroupaathanasia complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT steedliz complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT strydomandre complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT taggartlaurence complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations
AT rapaportpenny complexinterventionsforaggressivechallengingbehaviourinadultswithintellectualdisabilityarapidrealistreviewinformedbymultiplepopulations