Cargando…
Behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes
Psychiatric diagnosis is moving away from symptom-based classification and towards multi-dimensional, biologically-based characterization, or biotyping. We previously identified three biotypes of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment based on functional brain connectivity. In this follow-up stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11682-023-00774-6 |
_version_ | 1785044192623329280 |
---|---|
author | Mulholland, Michele M. Prinsloo, Sarah Kvale, Elizabeth Dula, Adrienne N. Palesh, Oxana Kesler, Shelli R. |
author_facet | Mulholland, Michele M. Prinsloo, Sarah Kvale, Elizabeth Dula, Adrienne N. Palesh, Oxana Kesler, Shelli R. |
author_sort | Mulholland, Michele M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Psychiatric diagnosis is moving away from symptom-based classification and towards multi-dimensional, biologically-based characterization, or biotyping. We previously identified three biotypes of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment based on functional brain connectivity. In this follow-up study of 80 chemotherapy-treated breast cancer survivors and 80 non-cancer controls, we evaluated additional factors to help explain biotype expression: neurofunctional stability, brain age, apolipoprotein (APOE) genotype, and psychoneurologic symptoms. We also compared the discriminative ability of a traditional, symptom-based cognitive impairment definition with that of biotypes. We found significant differences in cortical brain age (F = 10.50, p < 0.001), neurofunctional stability (F = 2.83, p = 0.041), APOE e4 genotype (X(2) = 7.68, p = 0.050), and psychoneurological symptoms (Pillai = 0.378, p < 0.001) across the three biotypes. The more resilient Biotype 2 demonstrated significantly higher neurofunctional stability compared to the other biotypes. Symptom-based classification of cognitive impairment did not differentiate biologic or other behavioral variables, suggesting that traditional categorization of cancer-related cognitive effects may miss important characteristics which could inform targeted treatment strategies. Additionally, biotyping, but not symptom-typing, was able to distinguish survivors with cognitive versus psychological effects. Our results suggest that Biotype 1 survivors might benefit from first addressing symptoms of anxiety and fatigue, Biotype 3 might benefit from a treatment plan which includes sleep hygiene, and Biotype 2 might benefit most from cognitive skills training or rehabilitation. Future research should include additional demographic and clinical information to further investigate biotype expression related to risk and resilience and examine integration of more clinically feasible imaging approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10195718 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101957182023-05-20 Behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes Mulholland, Michele M. Prinsloo, Sarah Kvale, Elizabeth Dula, Adrienne N. Palesh, Oxana Kesler, Shelli R. Brain Imaging Behav Research Psychiatric diagnosis is moving away from symptom-based classification and towards multi-dimensional, biologically-based characterization, or biotyping. We previously identified three biotypes of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment based on functional brain connectivity. In this follow-up study of 80 chemotherapy-treated breast cancer survivors and 80 non-cancer controls, we evaluated additional factors to help explain biotype expression: neurofunctional stability, brain age, apolipoprotein (APOE) genotype, and psychoneurologic symptoms. We also compared the discriminative ability of a traditional, symptom-based cognitive impairment definition with that of biotypes. We found significant differences in cortical brain age (F = 10.50, p < 0.001), neurofunctional stability (F = 2.83, p = 0.041), APOE e4 genotype (X(2) = 7.68, p = 0.050), and psychoneurological symptoms (Pillai = 0.378, p < 0.001) across the three biotypes. The more resilient Biotype 2 demonstrated significantly higher neurofunctional stability compared to the other biotypes. Symptom-based classification of cognitive impairment did not differentiate biologic or other behavioral variables, suggesting that traditional categorization of cancer-related cognitive effects may miss important characteristics which could inform targeted treatment strategies. Additionally, biotyping, but not symptom-typing, was able to distinguish survivors with cognitive versus psychological effects. Our results suggest that Biotype 1 survivors might benefit from first addressing symptoms of anxiety and fatigue, Biotype 3 might benefit from a treatment plan which includes sleep hygiene, and Biotype 2 might benefit most from cognitive skills training or rehabilitation. Future research should include additional demographic and clinical information to further investigate biotype expression related to risk and resilience and examine integration of more clinically feasible imaging approaches. Springer US 2023-05-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10195718/ /pubmed/37127832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11682-023-00774-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Mulholland, Michele M. Prinsloo, Sarah Kvale, Elizabeth Dula, Adrienne N. Palesh, Oxana Kesler, Shelli R. Behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes |
title | Behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes |
title_full | Behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes |
title_fullStr | Behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes |
title_short | Behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes |
title_sort | behavioral and biologic characteristics of cancer-related cognitive impairment biotypes |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195718/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11682-023-00774-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulhollandmichelem behavioralandbiologiccharacteristicsofcancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentbiotypes AT prinsloosarah behavioralandbiologiccharacteristicsofcancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentbiotypes AT kvaleelizabeth behavioralandbiologiccharacteristicsofcancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentbiotypes AT dulaadriennen behavioralandbiologiccharacteristicsofcancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentbiotypes AT paleshoxana behavioralandbiologiccharacteristicsofcancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentbiotypes AT keslershellir behavioralandbiologiccharacteristicsofcancerrelatedcognitiveimpairmentbiotypes |