Cargando…
Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of the novel coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) 2.0 compared with CAD-RADS 1.0 in patients with suspectedcoronary artery disease (CAD) evaluated by convolutional neural networks (CNN) based cor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15988 |
_version_ | 1785044229424152576 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Zengfa Yang, Yang Wang, Zheng Hu, Yunting Cao, Beibei Li, Mei Du, Xinyu Wang, Xi Li, Zuoqin Wang, Wanpeng Ding, Yi Xiao, Jianwei Hu, Yun Wang, Xiang |
author_facet | Huang, Zengfa Yang, Yang Wang, Zheng Hu, Yunting Cao, Beibei Li, Mei Du, Xinyu Wang, Xi Li, Zuoqin Wang, Wanpeng Ding, Yi Xiao, Jianwei Hu, Yun Wang, Xiang |
author_sort | Huang, Zengfa |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of the novel coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) 2.0 compared with CAD-RADS 1.0 in patients with suspectedcoronary artery disease (CAD) evaluated by convolutional neural networks (CNN) based coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS: A total of 1796 consecutive inpatients with suspected CAD were evaluated by CCTA for CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 classifications. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox models were used to estimate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) inclusive of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction (MI). The C-statistic was used to assess the discriminatory ability of the two classifications. RESULTS: In total, 94 (5.2%) MACE occurred over the median follow-up of 45.25 months (interquartile range 43.53–46.63 months). The annualized MACE rate was 0.014 (95% CI: 0.011–0.017). Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that the CAD-RADS classification, segment involvement score (SIS) grade, and Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR) classification were all significantly associated with the increase in the cumulative MACE (all P < 0.001). CAD-RADS classification, SIS grade, and CT-FFR classification were significantly associated with endpoint in univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. CAD-RADS 2.0 showed a further incremental increase in the prognostic value in predicting MACE (c-statistic 0.702, 95% CI: 0.641–0.763, P = 0.047), compared with CAD-RADS 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: The novel CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by CNN-based CCTA showed higher prognostic value of MACE than CAD-RADS 1.0 in patients with suspected CAD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10195897 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101958972023-05-20 Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA Huang, Zengfa Yang, Yang Wang, Zheng Hu, Yunting Cao, Beibei Li, Mei Du, Xinyu Wang, Xi Li, Zuoqin Wang, Wanpeng Ding, Yi Xiao, Jianwei Hu, Yun Wang, Xiang Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic value of the novel coronary artery disease reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) 2.0 compared with CAD-RADS 1.0 in patients with suspectedcoronary artery disease (CAD) evaluated by convolutional neural networks (CNN) based coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODS: A total of 1796 consecutive inpatients with suspected CAD were evaluated by CCTA for CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 classifications. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox models were used to estimate major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) inclusive of all-cause mortality or myocardial infarction (MI). The C-statistic was used to assess the discriminatory ability of the two classifications. RESULTS: In total, 94 (5.2%) MACE occurred over the median follow-up of 45.25 months (interquartile range 43.53–46.63 months). The annualized MACE rate was 0.014 (95% CI: 0.011–0.017). Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that the CAD-RADS classification, segment involvement score (SIS) grade, and Computed Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve (CT-FFR) classification were all significantly associated with the increase in the cumulative MACE (all P < 0.001). CAD-RADS classification, SIS grade, and CT-FFR classification were significantly associated with endpoint in univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. CAD-RADS 2.0 showed a further incremental increase in the prognostic value in predicting MACE (c-statistic 0.702, 95% CI: 0.641–0.763, P = 0.047), compared with CAD-RADS 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: The novel CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by CNN-based CCTA showed higher prognostic value of MACE than CAD-RADS 1.0 in patients with suspected CAD. Elsevier 2023-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10195897/ /pubmed/37215852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15988 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Huang, Zengfa Yang, Yang Wang, Zheng Hu, Yunting Cao, Beibei Li, Mei Du, Xinyu Wang, Xi Li, Zuoqin Wang, Wanpeng Ding, Yi Xiao, Jianwei Hu, Yun Wang, Xiang Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA |
title | Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA |
title_full | Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA |
title_fullStr | Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA |
title_short | Comparison of prognostic value between CAD-RADS 1.0 and CAD-RADS 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based CCTA |
title_sort | comparison of prognostic value between cad-rads 1.0 and cad-rads 2.0 evaluated by convolutional neural networks based ccta |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangzengfa comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT yangyang comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT wangzheng comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT huyunting comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT caobeibei comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT limei comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT duxinyu comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT wangxi comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT lizuoqin comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT wangwanpeng comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT dingyi comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT xiaojianwei comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT huyun comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta AT wangxiang comparisonofprognosticvaluebetweencadrads10andcadrads20evaluatedbyconvolutionalneuralnetworksbasedccta |