Cargando…
Prognostic value of right ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with immunoglobulin light-chain cardiac amyloidosis
AIMS: Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) (LV-GLS) is a strong and independent predictor of outcomes in patients with immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis. This study was performed to investigate whether right ventricular (RV) GLS (RV-GLS) provides prognostic inform...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oead048 |
Sumario: | AIMS: Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) (LV-GLS) is a strong and independent predictor of outcomes in patients with immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis. This study was performed to investigate whether right ventricular (RV) GLS (RV-GLS) provides prognostic information in patients with AL amyloidosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 74 patients who were diagnosed with AL cardiac amyloidosis at Kumamoto University Hospital from December 2005 to December 2022, 65 patients who had enough information for two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging and did not receive chemotherapy before the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis were retrospectively analysed. During a median follow-up of 359 days, 29 deaths occurred. In two-dimensional echocardiographic findings, LV-GLS, left atrium reservoir strain (LASr), and RV-GLS were significantly lower in the all-cause death group than in the survival group (LV-GLS: 8.9 ± 4.2 vs. 11.7 ± 3.9, P < 0.01; LASr: 9.06 ± 7.28 vs. 14.09 ± 8.32, P < 0.05; RV-GLS: 12.0 ± 5.1 vs. 16.8 ± 4.0, P < 0.01). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed RV-GLS was significantly and independently associated with all-cause death in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–0.94; P < 0.01). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the area under the curve of RV-GLS for all-cause death was 0.774 and that the best cut-off value of RV-GLS was 14.5% (sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 72%). In the Kaplan–Meier analysis, patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis who had low RV-GLS (<14.5%) had a significantly higher probability of all-cause death (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: RV-GLS has prognostic value in patients with AL cardiac amyloidosis and provides greater prognostic power than LV-GLS and LASr. |
---|