Cargando…

A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”

The picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm allows us to delve into the process of lexical access in language production with great precision. It creates situations of interference between target pictures and superimposed distractor words that participants must consciously ignore to name the pictur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sá-Leite, Ana Rita, Comesaña, Montserrat, Acuña-Fariña, Carlos, Fraga, Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884
_version_ 1785044296933572608
author Sá-Leite, Ana Rita
Comesaña, Montserrat
Acuña-Fariña, Carlos
Fraga, Isabel
author_facet Sá-Leite, Ana Rita
Comesaña, Montserrat
Acuña-Fariña, Carlos
Fraga, Isabel
author_sort Sá-Leite, Ana Rita
collection PubMed
description The picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm allows us to delve into the process of lexical access in language production with great precision. It creates situations of interference between target pictures and superimposed distractor words that participants must consciously ignore to name the pictures. Yet, although the PWI paradigm has offered numerous insights at all levels of lexical representation, in this work we expose an extended lack of control regarding the variable animacy. Animacy has been shown to have a great impact on cognition, especially when it comes to the mechanisms of attention, which are highly biased toward animate entities to the detriment of inanimate objects. Furthermore, animate nouns have been shown to be semantically richer and prioritized during lexical access, with effects observable in multiple psycholinguistic tasks. Indeed, not only does the performance on a PWI task directly depend on the different stages of lexical access to nouns, but also attention has a fundamental role in it, as participants must focus on targets and ignore interfering distractors. We conducted a systematic review with the terms “picture-word interference paradigm” and “animacy” in the databases PsycInfo and Psychology Database. The search revealed that only 12 from a total of 193 PWI studies controlled for animacy, and only one considered it as a factor in the design. The remaining studies included animate and inanimate stimuli in their materials randomly, sometimes in a very disproportionate amount across conditions. We speculate about the possible impact of this uncontrolled variable mixing on many types of effects within the framework of multiple theories, namely the Animate Monitoring Hypothesis, the WEAVER++ model, and the Independent Network Model in an attempt to fuel the theoretical debate on this issue as well as the empirical research to turn speculations into knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10196210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101962102023-05-20 A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates” Sá-Leite, Ana Rita Comesaña, Montserrat Acuña-Fariña, Carlos Fraga, Isabel Front Psychol Psychology The picture-word interference (PWI) paradigm allows us to delve into the process of lexical access in language production with great precision. It creates situations of interference between target pictures and superimposed distractor words that participants must consciously ignore to name the pictures. Yet, although the PWI paradigm has offered numerous insights at all levels of lexical representation, in this work we expose an extended lack of control regarding the variable animacy. Animacy has been shown to have a great impact on cognition, especially when it comes to the mechanisms of attention, which are highly biased toward animate entities to the detriment of inanimate objects. Furthermore, animate nouns have been shown to be semantically richer and prioritized during lexical access, with effects observable in multiple psycholinguistic tasks. Indeed, not only does the performance on a PWI task directly depend on the different stages of lexical access to nouns, but also attention has a fundamental role in it, as participants must focus on targets and ignore interfering distractors. We conducted a systematic review with the terms “picture-word interference paradigm” and “animacy” in the databases PsycInfo and Psychology Database. The search revealed that only 12 from a total of 193 PWI studies controlled for animacy, and only one considered it as a factor in the design. The remaining studies included animate and inanimate stimuli in their materials randomly, sometimes in a very disproportionate amount across conditions. We speculate about the possible impact of this uncontrolled variable mixing on many types of effects within the framework of multiple theories, namely the Animate Monitoring Hypothesis, the WEAVER++ model, and the Independent Network Model in an attempt to fuel the theoretical debate on this issue as well as the empirical research to turn speculations into knowledge. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10196210/ /pubmed/37213376 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sá-Leite, Comesaña, Acuña-Fariña and Fraga. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Sá-Leite, Ana Rita
Comesaña, Montserrat
Acuña-Fariña, Carlos
Fraga, Isabel
A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”
title A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”
title_full A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”
title_fullStr A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”
title_full_unstemmed A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”
title_short A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”
title_sort cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of “in/animates”
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213376
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145884
work_keys_str_mv AT saleiteanarita acautionarynoteonthestudiesusingthepicturewordinterferenceparadigmtheunwelcomeconsequencesoftherandomuseofinanimates
AT comesanamontserrat acautionarynoteonthestudiesusingthepicturewordinterferenceparadigmtheunwelcomeconsequencesoftherandomuseofinanimates
AT acunafarinacarlos acautionarynoteonthestudiesusingthepicturewordinterferenceparadigmtheunwelcomeconsequencesoftherandomuseofinanimates
AT fragaisabel acautionarynoteonthestudiesusingthepicturewordinterferenceparadigmtheunwelcomeconsequencesoftherandomuseofinanimates
AT saleiteanarita cautionarynoteonthestudiesusingthepicturewordinterferenceparadigmtheunwelcomeconsequencesoftherandomuseofinanimates
AT comesanamontserrat cautionarynoteonthestudiesusingthepicturewordinterferenceparadigmtheunwelcomeconsequencesoftherandomuseofinanimates
AT acunafarinacarlos cautionarynoteonthestudiesusingthepicturewordinterferenceparadigmtheunwelcomeconsequencesoftherandomuseofinanimates
AT fragaisabel cautionarynoteonthestudiesusingthepicturewordinterferenceparadigmtheunwelcomeconsequencesoftherandomuseofinanimates