Cargando…

Transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers

RATIONALE: Electronic (e)-cigarettes are popular among youth and cigarette smokers attempting to quit. Studies to date have focused on the utility of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool, but the biological effects are largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To identify transcriptomic differences in the bl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perez, Mario F., Yurieva, Marina, Poddutoori, Spandana, Mortensen, Eric M., Crotty Alexander, Laura E., Williams, Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02438-x
_version_ 1785044323377610752
author Perez, Mario F.
Yurieva, Marina
Poddutoori, Spandana
Mortensen, Eric M.
Crotty Alexander, Laura E.
Williams, Adam
author_facet Perez, Mario F.
Yurieva, Marina
Poddutoori, Spandana
Mortensen, Eric M.
Crotty Alexander, Laura E.
Williams, Adam
author_sort Perez, Mario F.
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Electronic (e)-cigarettes are popular among youth and cigarette smokers attempting to quit. Studies to date have focused on the utility of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool, but the biological effects are largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To identify transcriptomic differences in the blood and sputum of e-cigarette users compared to conventional cigarettes smokers and healthy controls and describe biological pathways affected by these tobacco products. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of whole blood and sputum RNA-sequencing data from 8 smokers, 9 e-cigarette users (e-cigs) and 4 controls. Weighted gene co-network analysis (WGCNA) identified gene module associations. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) identified canonical pathways associated with tobacco products. MAIN RESULTS: In blood, a three-group comparison showed 16 differentially expressed genes (DEGs); pair-wise comparison showed 7 DEGs between e-cigs and controls, 35 DEGs between smokers and controls, and 13 DEGs between smokers and e-cigs. In sputum, 438 DEGs were in the three-group comparison. In pair-wise comparisons, there were 2 DEGs between e-cigs and controls, 270 DEGs between smokers and controls, and 468 DEGs between smokers and e-cigs. Only 2 genes in the smokers vs. control comparison overlapped between blood and sputum. Most gene modules identified through WGCNA associated with tobacco product exposures also were associated with cotinine and exhaled CO levels. IPA showed more canonical pathways altered by conventional cigarette smoking than by e-cigarette use. CONCLUSION: Cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use led to transcriptomic changes in both blood and sputum. However, conventional cigarettes induced much stronger transcriptomic responses in both compartments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-023-02438-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10196320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101963202023-05-20 Transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers Perez, Mario F. Yurieva, Marina Poddutoori, Spandana Mortensen, Eric M. Crotty Alexander, Laura E. Williams, Adam Respir Res Research RATIONALE: Electronic (e)-cigarettes are popular among youth and cigarette smokers attempting to quit. Studies to date have focused on the utility of e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool, but the biological effects are largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: To identify transcriptomic differences in the blood and sputum of e-cigarette users compared to conventional cigarettes smokers and healthy controls and describe biological pathways affected by these tobacco products. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of whole blood and sputum RNA-sequencing data from 8 smokers, 9 e-cigarette users (e-cigs) and 4 controls. Weighted gene co-network analysis (WGCNA) identified gene module associations. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) identified canonical pathways associated with tobacco products. MAIN RESULTS: In blood, a three-group comparison showed 16 differentially expressed genes (DEGs); pair-wise comparison showed 7 DEGs between e-cigs and controls, 35 DEGs between smokers and controls, and 13 DEGs between smokers and e-cigs. In sputum, 438 DEGs were in the three-group comparison. In pair-wise comparisons, there were 2 DEGs between e-cigs and controls, 270 DEGs between smokers and controls, and 468 DEGs between smokers and e-cigs. Only 2 genes in the smokers vs. control comparison overlapped between blood and sputum. Most gene modules identified through WGCNA associated with tobacco product exposures also were associated with cotinine and exhaled CO levels. IPA showed more canonical pathways altered by conventional cigarette smoking than by e-cigarette use. CONCLUSION: Cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use led to transcriptomic changes in both blood and sputum. However, conventional cigarettes induced much stronger transcriptomic responses in both compartments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-023-02438-x. BioMed Central 2023-05-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10196320/ /pubmed/37208747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02438-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Perez, Mario F.
Yurieva, Marina
Poddutoori, Spandana
Mortensen, Eric M.
Crotty Alexander, Laura E.
Williams, Adam
Transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers
title Transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers
title_full Transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers
title_fullStr Transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers
title_full_unstemmed Transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers
title_short Transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers
title_sort transcriptomic responses in the blood and sputum of cigarette smokers compared to e-cigarette vapers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02438-x
work_keys_str_mv AT perezmariof transcriptomicresponsesinthebloodandsputumofcigarettesmokerscomparedtoecigarettevapers
AT yurievamarina transcriptomicresponsesinthebloodandsputumofcigarettesmokerscomparedtoecigarettevapers
AT poddutoorispandana transcriptomicresponsesinthebloodandsputumofcigarettesmokerscomparedtoecigarettevapers
AT mortensenericm transcriptomicresponsesinthebloodandsputumofcigarettesmokerscomparedtoecigarettevapers
AT crottyalexanderlaurae transcriptomicresponsesinthebloodandsputumofcigarettesmokerscomparedtoecigarettevapers
AT williamsadam transcriptomicresponsesinthebloodandsputumofcigarettesmokerscomparedtoecigarettevapers