Cargando…
Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the collaborative potential between artificial intelligence (AI) and pulmonologists for diagnosing pulmonary disease. We hypothesised that the collaboration between a pulmonologist and AI with explanations (explainable AI (XAI)) is superior in diagnostic int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Respiratory Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37080566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01720-2022 |
_version_ | 1785044331526094848 |
---|---|
author | Das, Nilakash Happaerts, Sofie Gyselinck, Iwein Staes, Michael Derom, Eric Brusselle, Guy Burgos, Felip Contoli, Marco Dinh-Xuan, Anh Tuan Franssen, Frits M.E. Gonem, Sherif Greening, Neil Haenebalcke, Christel Man, William D-C. Moisés, Jorge Peché, Rudi Poberezhets, Vitalii Quint, Jennifer K. Steiner, Michael C. Vanderhelst, Eef Abdo, Mustafa Topalovic, Marko Janssens, Wim |
author_facet | Das, Nilakash Happaerts, Sofie Gyselinck, Iwein Staes, Michael Derom, Eric Brusselle, Guy Burgos, Felip Contoli, Marco Dinh-Xuan, Anh Tuan Franssen, Frits M.E. Gonem, Sherif Greening, Neil Haenebalcke, Christel Man, William D-C. Moisés, Jorge Peché, Rudi Poberezhets, Vitalii Quint, Jennifer K. Steiner, Michael C. Vanderhelst, Eef Abdo, Mustafa Topalovic, Marko Janssens, Wim |
author_sort | Das, Nilakash |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the collaborative potential between artificial intelligence (AI) and pulmonologists for diagnosing pulmonary disease. We hypothesised that the collaboration between a pulmonologist and AI with explanations (explainable AI (XAI)) is superior in diagnostic interpretation of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) than the pulmonologist without support. METHODS: The study was conducted in two phases, a monocentre study (phase 1) and a multicentre intervention study (phase 2). Each phase utilised two different sets of 24 PFT reports of patients with a clinically validated gold standard diagnosis. Each PFT was interpreted without (control) and with XAI's suggestions (intervention). Pulmonologists provided a differential diagnosis consisting of a preferential diagnosis and optionally up to three additional diagnoses. The primary end-point compared accuracy of preferential and additional diagnoses between control and intervention. Secondary end-points were the number of diagnoses in differential diagnosis, diagnostic confidence and inter-rater agreement. We also analysed how XAI influenced pulmonologists’ decisions. RESULTS: In phase 1 (n=16 pulmonologists), mean preferential and differential diagnostic accuracy significantly increased by 10.4% and 9.4%, respectively, between control and intervention (p<0.001). Improvements were somewhat lower but highly significant (p<0.0001) in phase 2 (5.4% and 8.7%, respectively; n=62 pulmonologists). In both phases, the number of diagnoses in the differential diagnosis did not reduce, but diagnostic confidence and inter-rater agreement significantly increased during intervention. Pulmonologists updated their decisions with XAI's feedback and consistently improved their baseline performance if AI provided correct predictions. CONCLUSION: A collaboration between a pulmonologist and XAI is better at interpreting PFTs than individual pulmonologists reading without XAI support or XAI alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10196345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | European Respiratory Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101963452023-05-20 Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation Das, Nilakash Happaerts, Sofie Gyselinck, Iwein Staes, Michael Derom, Eric Brusselle, Guy Burgos, Felip Contoli, Marco Dinh-Xuan, Anh Tuan Franssen, Frits M.E. Gonem, Sherif Greening, Neil Haenebalcke, Christel Man, William D-C. Moisés, Jorge Peché, Rudi Poberezhets, Vitalii Quint, Jennifer K. Steiner, Michael C. Vanderhelst, Eef Abdo, Mustafa Topalovic, Marko Janssens, Wim Eur Respir J Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the collaborative potential between artificial intelligence (AI) and pulmonologists for diagnosing pulmonary disease. We hypothesised that the collaboration between a pulmonologist and AI with explanations (explainable AI (XAI)) is superior in diagnostic interpretation of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) than the pulmonologist without support. METHODS: The study was conducted in two phases, a monocentre study (phase 1) and a multicentre intervention study (phase 2). Each phase utilised two different sets of 24 PFT reports of patients with a clinically validated gold standard diagnosis. Each PFT was interpreted without (control) and with XAI's suggestions (intervention). Pulmonologists provided a differential diagnosis consisting of a preferential diagnosis and optionally up to three additional diagnoses. The primary end-point compared accuracy of preferential and additional diagnoses between control and intervention. Secondary end-points were the number of diagnoses in differential diagnosis, diagnostic confidence and inter-rater agreement. We also analysed how XAI influenced pulmonologists’ decisions. RESULTS: In phase 1 (n=16 pulmonologists), mean preferential and differential diagnostic accuracy significantly increased by 10.4% and 9.4%, respectively, between control and intervention (p<0.001). Improvements were somewhat lower but highly significant (p<0.0001) in phase 2 (5.4% and 8.7%, respectively; n=62 pulmonologists). In both phases, the number of diagnoses in the differential diagnosis did not reduce, but diagnostic confidence and inter-rater agreement significantly increased during intervention. Pulmonologists updated their decisions with XAI's feedback and consistently improved their baseline performance if AI provided correct predictions. CONCLUSION: A collaboration between a pulmonologist and XAI is better at interpreting PFTs than individual pulmonologists reading without XAI support or XAI alone. European Respiratory Society 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10196345/ /pubmed/37080566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01720-2022 Text en Copyright ©The authors 2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This version is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0. For commercial reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org (mailto:permissions@ersnet.org) |
spellingShingle | Original Research Articles Das, Nilakash Happaerts, Sofie Gyselinck, Iwein Staes, Michael Derom, Eric Brusselle, Guy Burgos, Felip Contoli, Marco Dinh-Xuan, Anh Tuan Franssen, Frits M.E. Gonem, Sherif Greening, Neil Haenebalcke, Christel Man, William D-C. Moisés, Jorge Peché, Rudi Poberezhets, Vitalii Quint, Jennifer K. Steiner, Michael C. Vanderhelst, Eef Abdo, Mustafa Topalovic, Marko Janssens, Wim Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation |
title | Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation |
title_full | Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation |
title_fullStr | Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation |
title_full_unstemmed | Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation |
title_short | Collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation |
title_sort | collaboration between explainable artificial intelligence and pulmonologists improves the accuracy of pulmonary function test interpretation |
topic | Original Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37080566 http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01720-2022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dasnilakash collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT happaertssofie collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT gyselinckiwein collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT staesmichael collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT deromeric collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT brusselleguy collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT burgosfelip collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT contolimarco collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT dinhxuananhtuan collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT franssenfritsme collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT gonemsherif collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT greeningneil collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT haenebalckechristel collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT manwilliamdc collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT moisesjorge collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT pecherudi collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT poberezhetsvitalii collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT quintjenniferk collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT steinermichaelc collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT vanderhelsteef collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT abdomustafa collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT topalovicmarko collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation AT janssenswim collaborationbetweenexplainableartificialintelligenceandpulmonologistsimprovestheaccuracyofpulmonaryfunctiontestinterpretation |