Cargando…

Performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: A systematic review

BACKGROUNDS: The prediabetes population is large and easily overlooked because of the lack of obvious symptoms, which can progress to diabetes. Early screening and targeted interventions can substantially reduce the rate of conversion of prediabetes to diabetes. Therefore, this study systematically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yujin, Feng, Wenming, Lou, Jianlin, Qiu, Wei, Shen, Jiantong, Zhu, Zhichao, Hua, Yuting, Zhang, Mei, Billong, Laura Flavorta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15529
_version_ 1785044373560360960
author Liu, Yujin
Feng, Wenming
Lou, Jianlin
Qiu, Wei
Shen, Jiantong
Zhu, Zhichao
Hua, Yuting
Zhang, Mei
Billong, Laura Flavorta
author_facet Liu, Yujin
Feng, Wenming
Lou, Jianlin
Qiu, Wei
Shen, Jiantong
Zhu, Zhichao
Hua, Yuting
Zhang, Mei
Billong, Laura Flavorta
author_sort Liu, Yujin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUNDS: The prediabetes population is large and easily overlooked because of the lack of obvious symptoms, which can progress to diabetes. Early screening and targeted interventions can substantially reduce the rate of conversion of prediabetes to diabetes. Therefore, this study systematically reviewed prediabetes risk prediction models, performed a summary and quality evaluation, and aimed to recommend the optimal model. METHODS: We systematically searched five databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and CNKI) for published literature related to prediabetes risk prediction models and excluded preprints, duplicate publications, reviews, editorials, and other studies, with a search time frame of March 01, 2023. Data were categorized and summarized using a standardized data extraction form that extracted data including author; publication date; study design; country; demographic characteristics; assessment tool name; sample size; study type; and model-related indicators. The PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias profile of included studies. FINDINGS: 14 studies with a total of 15 models were eventually included in the systematic review. We found that the most common predictors of models were age, family history of diabetes, gender, history of hypertension, and BMI. Most of the studies (83.3%) had a high risk of bias, mainly related to under-reporting of outcome information and poor methodological design during the development and validation of models. Due to the low quality of included studies, the evidence for predictive validity of the available models is unclear. INTERPRETATION: We should pay attention to the early screening of prediabetes patients and give timely pharmacological and lifestyle interventions. The predictive performance of the existing model is not satisfactory, and the model building process can be standardized and external validation can be added to improve the accuracy of the model in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10196520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101965202023-05-20 Performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: A systematic review Liu, Yujin Feng, Wenming Lou, Jianlin Qiu, Wei Shen, Jiantong Zhu, Zhichao Hua, Yuting Zhang, Mei Billong, Laura Flavorta Heliyon Review Article BACKGROUNDS: The prediabetes population is large and easily overlooked because of the lack of obvious symptoms, which can progress to diabetes. Early screening and targeted interventions can substantially reduce the rate of conversion of prediabetes to diabetes. Therefore, this study systematically reviewed prediabetes risk prediction models, performed a summary and quality evaluation, and aimed to recommend the optimal model. METHODS: We systematically searched five databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web Of Science, and CNKI) for published literature related to prediabetes risk prediction models and excluded preprints, duplicate publications, reviews, editorials, and other studies, with a search time frame of March 01, 2023. Data were categorized and summarized using a standardized data extraction form that extracted data including author; publication date; study design; country; demographic characteristics; assessment tool name; sample size; study type; and model-related indicators. The PROBAST tool was used to assess the risk of bias profile of included studies. FINDINGS: 14 studies with a total of 15 models were eventually included in the systematic review. We found that the most common predictors of models were age, family history of diabetes, gender, history of hypertension, and BMI. Most of the studies (83.3%) had a high risk of bias, mainly related to under-reporting of outcome information and poor methodological design during the development and validation of models. Due to the low quality of included studies, the evidence for predictive validity of the available models is unclear. INTERPRETATION: We should pay attention to the early screening of prediabetes patients and give timely pharmacological and lifestyle interventions. The predictive performance of the existing model is not satisfactory, and the model building process can be standardized and external validation can be added to improve the accuracy of the model in the future. Elsevier 2023-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10196520/ /pubmed/37215820 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15529 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Liu, Yujin
Feng, Wenming
Lou, Jianlin
Qiu, Wei
Shen, Jiantong
Zhu, Zhichao
Hua, Yuting
Zhang, Mei
Billong, Laura Flavorta
Performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: A systematic review
title Performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: A systematic review
title_full Performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: A systematic review
title_fullStr Performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: A systematic review
title_short Performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: A systematic review
title_sort performance of a prediabetes risk prediction model: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15529
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyujin performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview
AT fengwenming performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview
AT loujianlin performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview
AT qiuwei performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview
AT shenjiantong performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview
AT zhuzhichao performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview
AT huayuting performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview
AT zhangmei performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview
AT billonglauraflavorta performanceofaprediabetesriskpredictionmodelasystematicreview