Cargando…

Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?

Self-relevant stimuli such as one’s name and face have been demonstrated to influence information processing in both the cognitive and affective domains. It has been observed that recently self-associated stimuli can also influence cognition, but their impact on affect has not been tested yet. In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela, Matschke, Christina, Schäfer, Sarah, Wesslein, Ann-Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221124928
_version_ 1785044449501380608
author Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela
Matschke, Christina
Schäfer, Sarah
Wesslein, Ann-Katrin
author_facet Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela
Matschke, Christina
Schäfer, Sarah
Wesslein, Ann-Katrin
author_sort Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela
collection PubMed
description Self-relevant stimuli such as one’s name and face have been demonstrated to influence information processing in both the cognitive and affective domains. It has been observed that recently self-associated stimuli can also influence cognition, but their impact on affect has not been tested yet. In the current study (N = 107), we test whether recently self-associated stimuli yield an affective bias and compare the size of the effect with that of familiar self-associated stimuli. A Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF) presenting self-associated, neutral object-associated, positive, and negative stimuli was used with two groups: one which categorised familiar words as self- and neutral object-associated stimuli, and a second which categorised recently self- and neutral object-associated geometric shapes. In both cases, response times were faster for congruent trials, which mapped response keys as “positive/self” and “negative/neutral object,” than for incongruent trials which mapped response keys as “positive/neutral object” and “negative/self.” The size of the effect yielded by familiar and new self-associated stimuli did not differ. This indicates that experimentally induced self-association can immediately yield an affective bias in favour of the self-associated stimulus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10196926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101969262023-05-20 Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela Matschke, Christina Schäfer, Sarah Wesslein, Ann-Katrin Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles Self-relevant stimuli such as one’s name and face have been demonstrated to influence information processing in both the cognitive and affective domains. It has been observed that recently self-associated stimuli can also influence cognition, but their impact on affect has not been tested yet. In the current study (N = 107), we test whether recently self-associated stimuli yield an affective bias and compare the size of the effect with that of familiar self-associated stimuli. A Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF) presenting self-associated, neutral object-associated, positive, and negative stimuli was used with two groups: one which categorised familiar words as self- and neutral object-associated stimuli, and a second which categorised recently self- and neutral object-associated geometric shapes. In both cases, response times were faster for congruent trials, which mapped response keys as “positive/self” and “negative/neutral object,” than for incongruent trials which mapped response keys as “positive/neutral object” and “negative/self.” The size of the effect yielded by familiar and new self-associated stimuli did not differ. This indicates that experimentally induced self-association can immediately yield an affective bias in favour of the self-associated stimulus. SAGE Publications 2022-10-14 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10196926/ /pubmed/36052697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221124928 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela
Matschke, Christina
Schäfer, Sarah
Wesslein, Ann-Katrin
Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
title Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
title_full Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
title_fullStr Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
title_full_unstemmed Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
title_short Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
title_sort does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221124928
work_keys_str_mv AT orellanacorralesgabriela doesanexperimentallyinducedselfassociationelicitaffectiveselfprioritisation
AT matschkechristina doesanexperimentallyinducedselfassociationelicitaffectiveselfprioritisation
AT schafersarah doesanexperimentallyinducedselfassociationelicitaffectiveselfprioritisation
AT wessleinannkatrin doesanexperimentallyinducedselfassociationelicitaffectiveselfprioritisation