Cargando…
Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation?
Self-relevant stimuli such as one’s name and face have been demonstrated to influence information processing in both the cognitive and affective domains. It has been observed that recently self-associated stimuli can also influence cognition, but their impact on affect has not been tested yet. In th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221124928 |
_version_ | 1785044449501380608 |
---|---|
author | Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela Matschke, Christina Schäfer, Sarah Wesslein, Ann-Katrin |
author_facet | Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela Matschke, Christina Schäfer, Sarah Wesslein, Ann-Katrin |
author_sort | Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Self-relevant stimuli such as one’s name and face have been demonstrated to influence information processing in both the cognitive and affective domains. It has been observed that recently self-associated stimuli can also influence cognition, but their impact on affect has not been tested yet. In the current study (N = 107), we test whether recently self-associated stimuli yield an affective bias and compare the size of the effect with that of familiar self-associated stimuli. A Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF) presenting self-associated, neutral object-associated, positive, and negative stimuli was used with two groups: one which categorised familiar words as self- and neutral object-associated stimuli, and a second which categorised recently self- and neutral object-associated geometric shapes. In both cases, response times were faster for congruent trials, which mapped response keys as “positive/self” and “negative/neutral object,” than for incongruent trials which mapped response keys as “positive/neutral object” and “negative/self.” The size of the effect yielded by familiar and new self-associated stimuli did not differ. This indicates that experimentally induced self-association can immediately yield an affective bias in favour of the self-associated stimulus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10196926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101969262023-05-20 Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela Matschke, Christina Schäfer, Sarah Wesslein, Ann-Katrin Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Original Articles Self-relevant stimuli such as one’s name and face have been demonstrated to influence information processing in both the cognitive and affective domains. It has been observed that recently self-associated stimuli can also influence cognition, but their impact on affect has not been tested yet. In the current study (N = 107), we test whether recently self-associated stimuli yield an affective bias and compare the size of the effect with that of familiar self-associated stimuli. A Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF) presenting self-associated, neutral object-associated, positive, and negative stimuli was used with two groups: one which categorised familiar words as self- and neutral object-associated stimuli, and a second which categorised recently self- and neutral object-associated geometric shapes. In both cases, response times were faster for congruent trials, which mapped response keys as “positive/self” and “negative/neutral object,” than for incongruent trials which mapped response keys as “positive/neutral object” and “negative/self.” The size of the effect yielded by familiar and new self-associated stimuli did not differ. This indicates that experimentally induced self-association can immediately yield an affective bias in favour of the self-associated stimulus. SAGE Publications 2022-10-14 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10196926/ /pubmed/36052697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221124928 Text en © Experimental Psychology Society 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Orellana-Corrales, Gabriela Matschke, Christina Schäfer, Sarah Wesslein, Ann-Katrin Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? |
title | Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? |
title_full | Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? |
title_fullStr | Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? |
title_short | Does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? |
title_sort | does an experimentally induced self-association elicit affective self-prioritisation? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10196926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36052697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17470218221124928 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT orellanacorralesgabriela doesanexperimentallyinducedselfassociationelicitaffectiveselfprioritisation AT matschkechristina doesanexperimentallyinducedselfassociationelicitaffectiveselfprioritisation AT schafersarah doesanexperimentallyinducedselfassociationelicitaffectiveselfprioritisation AT wessleinannkatrin doesanexperimentallyinducedselfassociationelicitaffectiveselfprioritisation |