Cargando…
Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance
Space can be used as a metaphor to describe semantic and perceptual similarity. Research has shown that similarity and spatial information can influence each other. On the one hand, similarity entails spatial closeness; on the other hand, proximity leads to similarity judgment. This spatial informat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37204615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01830-y |
_version_ | 1785044469068857344 |
---|---|
author | Tuena, Cosimo Di Lernia, Daniele Riva, Giuseppe Serino, Silvia Repetto, Claudia |
author_facet | Tuena, Cosimo Di Lernia, Daniele Riva, Giuseppe Serino, Silvia Repetto, Claudia |
author_sort | Tuena, Cosimo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Space can be used as a metaphor to describe semantic and perceptual similarity. Research has shown that similarity and spatial information can influence each other. On the one hand, similarity entails spatial closeness; on the other hand, proximity leads to similarity judgment. This spatial information can be stored in declarative memory and measured later on. However, it is unknown if phonological similarity/dissimilarity between words is represented as spatial closeness/distance in declarative memory. In this study, 61 young adults were tested on a remember-know (RK) spatial distance task. Participants learned noun pairs on the PC screen that were manipulated concerning their phonological similarity (similar vs. dissimilar) and reciprocal spatial distance (near vs. far). In the recognition phase, old-new, RK, and spatial distance judgments were asked. We found that for hit responses in both R and K judgments, phonologically similar word pairs were remembered closer compared to phonologically dissimilar pairs. This was also true for false alarms after K judgments. Lastly, the actual spatial distance at encoding was only retained for hit R responses. Results suggest that phonological similarity/dissimilarity is represented respectively with spatial closeness/distance and that this information is stored in the neurocognitive system of declarative memory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-023-01830-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10197043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101970432023-05-23 Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance Tuena, Cosimo Di Lernia, Daniele Riva, Giuseppe Serino, Silvia Repetto, Claudia Psychol Res Research Space can be used as a metaphor to describe semantic and perceptual similarity. Research has shown that similarity and spatial information can influence each other. On the one hand, similarity entails spatial closeness; on the other hand, proximity leads to similarity judgment. This spatial information can be stored in declarative memory and measured later on. However, it is unknown if phonological similarity/dissimilarity between words is represented as spatial closeness/distance in declarative memory. In this study, 61 young adults were tested on a remember-know (RK) spatial distance task. Participants learned noun pairs on the PC screen that were manipulated concerning their phonological similarity (similar vs. dissimilar) and reciprocal spatial distance (near vs. far). In the recognition phase, old-new, RK, and spatial distance judgments were asked. We found that for hit responses in both R and K judgments, phonologically similar word pairs were remembered closer compared to phonologically dissimilar pairs. This was also true for false alarms after K judgments. Lastly, the actual spatial distance at encoding was only retained for hit R responses. Results suggest that phonological similarity/dissimilarity is represented respectively with spatial closeness/distance and that this information is stored in the neurocognitive system of declarative memory. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00426-023-01830-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-19 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10197043/ /pubmed/37204615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01830-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Tuena, Cosimo Di Lernia, Daniele Riva, Giuseppe Serino, Silvia Repetto, Claudia Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance |
title | Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance |
title_full | Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance |
title_fullStr | Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance |
title_full_unstemmed | Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance |
title_short | Phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance |
title_sort | phonological similarity between words is represented in declarative memory as spatial distance |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37204615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01830-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuenacosimo phonologicalsimilaritybetweenwordsisrepresentedindeclarativememoryasspatialdistance AT dilerniadaniele phonologicalsimilaritybetweenwordsisrepresentedindeclarativememoryasspatialdistance AT rivagiuseppe phonologicalsimilaritybetweenwordsisrepresentedindeclarativememoryasspatialdistance AT serinosilvia phonologicalsimilaritybetweenwordsisrepresentedindeclarativememoryasspatialdistance AT repettoclaudia phonologicalsimilaritybetweenwordsisrepresentedindeclarativememoryasspatialdistance |