Cargando…
DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies
[Image: see text] In resource-limited settings, conventional sanitation systems often fail to meet their goals—with system failures stemming from a mismatch among community needs, constraints, and deployed technologies. Although decision-making tools exist to help assess the appropriateness of conve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00067 |
_version_ | 1785044495107096576 |
---|---|
author | Lohman, Hannah A. C. Morgan, Victoria L. Li, Yalin Zhang, Xinyi Rowles, Lewis S. Cook, Sherri M. Guest, Jeremy S. |
author_facet | Lohman, Hannah A. C. Morgan, Victoria L. Li, Yalin Zhang, Xinyi Rowles, Lewis S. Cook, Sherri M. Guest, Jeremy S. |
author_sort | Lohman, Hannah A. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] In resource-limited settings, conventional sanitation systems often fail to meet their goals—with system failures stemming from a mismatch among community needs, constraints, and deployed technologies. Although decision-making tools exist to help assess the appropriateness of conventional sanitation systems in a specific context, there is a lack of a holistic decision-making framework to guide sanitation research, development, and deployment (RD&D) of technologies. In this study, we introduce DMsan—an open-source multi-criteria decision analysis Python package that enables users to transparently compare sanitation and resource recovery alternatives and characterize the opportunity space for early-stage technologies. Informed by the methodological choices frequently used in literature, the core structure of DMsan includes five criteria (technical, resource recovery, economic, environmental, and social), 28 indicators, criteria weight scenarios, and indicator weight scenarios tailored to 250 countries/territories, all of which can be adapted by end-users. DMsan integrates with the open-source Python package QSDsan (quantitative sustainable design for sanitation and resource recovery systems) for system design and simulation to calculate quantitative economic (via techno-economic analysis), environmental (via life cycle assessment), and resource recovery indicators under uncertainty. Here, we illustrate the core capabilities of DMsan using an existing, conventional sanitation system and two proposed alternative systems for Bwaise, an informal settlement in Kampala, Uganda. The two example use cases are (i) use by implementation decision makers to enhance decision-making transparency and understand the robustness of sanitation choices given uncertain and/or varying stakeholder input and technology ability and (ii) use by technology developers seeking to identify and expand the opportunity space for their technologies. Through these examples, we demonstrate the utility of DMsan to evaluate sanitation and resource recovery systems tailored to individual contexts and increase transparency in technology evaluations, RD&D prioritization, and context-specific decision making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10197171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101971712023-05-20 DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies Lohman, Hannah A. C. Morgan, Victoria L. Li, Yalin Zhang, Xinyi Rowles, Lewis S. Cook, Sherri M. Guest, Jeremy S. ACS Environ Au [Image: see text] In resource-limited settings, conventional sanitation systems often fail to meet their goals—with system failures stemming from a mismatch among community needs, constraints, and deployed technologies. Although decision-making tools exist to help assess the appropriateness of conventional sanitation systems in a specific context, there is a lack of a holistic decision-making framework to guide sanitation research, development, and deployment (RD&D) of technologies. In this study, we introduce DMsan—an open-source multi-criteria decision analysis Python package that enables users to transparently compare sanitation and resource recovery alternatives and characterize the opportunity space for early-stage technologies. Informed by the methodological choices frequently used in literature, the core structure of DMsan includes five criteria (technical, resource recovery, economic, environmental, and social), 28 indicators, criteria weight scenarios, and indicator weight scenarios tailored to 250 countries/territories, all of which can be adapted by end-users. DMsan integrates with the open-source Python package QSDsan (quantitative sustainable design for sanitation and resource recovery systems) for system design and simulation to calculate quantitative economic (via techno-economic analysis), environmental (via life cycle assessment), and resource recovery indicators under uncertainty. Here, we illustrate the core capabilities of DMsan using an existing, conventional sanitation system and two proposed alternative systems for Bwaise, an informal settlement in Kampala, Uganda. The two example use cases are (i) use by implementation decision makers to enhance decision-making transparency and understand the robustness of sanitation choices given uncertain and/or varying stakeholder input and technology ability and (ii) use by technology developers seeking to identify and expand the opportunity space for their technologies. Through these examples, we demonstrate the utility of DMsan to evaluate sanitation and resource recovery systems tailored to individual contexts and increase transparency in technology evaluations, RD&D prioritization, and context-specific decision making. American Chemical Society 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10197171/ /pubmed/37215438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00067 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Lohman, Hannah A. C. Morgan, Victoria L. Li, Yalin Zhang, Xinyi Rowles, Lewis S. Cook, Sherri M. Guest, Jeremy S. DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies |
title | DMsan: A Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis Framework
and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation
and Resource Recovery Technologies |
title_full | DMsan: A Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis Framework
and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation
and Resource Recovery Technologies |
title_fullStr | DMsan: A Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis Framework
and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation
and Resource Recovery Technologies |
title_full_unstemmed | DMsan: A Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis Framework
and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation
and Resource Recovery Technologies |
title_short | DMsan: A Multi-Criteria
Decision Analysis Framework
and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation
and Resource Recovery Technologies |
title_sort | dmsan: a multi-criteria
decision analysis framework
and package to characterize contextualized sustainability of sanitation
and resource recovery technologies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lohmanhannahac dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies AT morganvictorial dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies AT liyalin dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies AT zhangxinyi dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies AT rowleslewiss dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies AT cooksherrim dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies AT guestjeremys dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies |