Cargando…

DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies

[Image: see text] In resource-limited settings, conventional sanitation systems often fail to meet their goals—with system failures stemming from a mismatch among community needs, constraints, and deployed technologies. Although decision-making tools exist to help assess the appropriateness of conve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lohman, Hannah A. C., Morgan, Victoria L., Li, Yalin, Zhang, Xinyi, Rowles, Lewis S., Cook, Sherri M., Guest, Jeremy S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00067
_version_ 1785044495107096576
author Lohman, Hannah A. C.
Morgan, Victoria L.
Li, Yalin
Zhang, Xinyi
Rowles, Lewis S.
Cook, Sherri M.
Guest, Jeremy S.
author_facet Lohman, Hannah A. C.
Morgan, Victoria L.
Li, Yalin
Zhang, Xinyi
Rowles, Lewis S.
Cook, Sherri M.
Guest, Jeremy S.
author_sort Lohman, Hannah A. C.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In resource-limited settings, conventional sanitation systems often fail to meet their goals—with system failures stemming from a mismatch among community needs, constraints, and deployed technologies. Although decision-making tools exist to help assess the appropriateness of conventional sanitation systems in a specific context, there is a lack of a holistic decision-making framework to guide sanitation research, development, and deployment (RD&D) of technologies. In this study, we introduce DMsan—an open-source multi-criteria decision analysis Python package that enables users to transparently compare sanitation and resource recovery alternatives and characterize the opportunity space for early-stage technologies. Informed by the methodological choices frequently used in literature, the core structure of DMsan includes five criteria (technical, resource recovery, economic, environmental, and social), 28 indicators, criteria weight scenarios, and indicator weight scenarios tailored to 250 countries/territories, all of which can be adapted by end-users. DMsan integrates with the open-source Python package QSDsan (quantitative sustainable design for sanitation and resource recovery systems) for system design and simulation to calculate quantitative economic (via techno-economic analysis), environmental (via life cycle assessment), and resource recovery indicators under uncertainty. Here, we illustrate the core capabilities of DMsan using an existing, conventional sanitation system and two proposed alternative systems for Bwaise, an informal settlement in Kampala, Uganda. The two example use cases are (i) use by implementation decision makers to enhance decision-making transparency and understand the robustness of sanitation choices given uncertain and/or varying stakeholder input and technology ability and (ii) use by technology developers seeking to identify and expand the opportunity space for their technologies. Through these examples, we demonstrate the utility of DMsan to evaluate sanitation and resource recovery systems tailored to individual contexts and increase transparency in technology evaluations, RD&D prioritization, and context-specific decision making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10197171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101971712023-05-20 DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies Lohman, Hannah A. C. Morgan, Victoria L. Li, Yalin Zhang, Xinyi Rowles, Lewis S. Cook, Sherri M. Guest, Jeremy S. ACS Environ Au [Image: see text] In resource-limited settings, conventional sanitation systems often fail to meet their goals—with system failures stemming from a mismatch among community needs, constraints, and deployed technologies. Although decision-making tools exist to help assess the appropriateness of conventional sanitation systems in a specific context, there is a lack of a holistic decision-making framework to guide sanitation research, development, and deployment (RD&D) of technologies. In this study, we introduce DMsan—an open-source multi-criteria decision analysis Python package that enables users to transparently compare sanitation and resource recovery alternatives and characterize the opportunity space for early-stage technologies. Informed by the methodological choices frequently used in literature, the core structure of DMsan includes five criteria (technical, resource recovery, economic, environmental, and social), 28 indicators, criteria weight scenarios, and indicator weight scenarios tailored to 250 countries/territories, all of which can be adapted by end-users. DMsan integrates with the open-source Python package QSDsan (quantitative sustainable design for sanitation and resource recovery systems) for system design and simulation to calculate quantitative economic (via techno-economic analysis), environmental (via life cycle assessment), and resource recovery indicators under uncertainty. Here, we illustrate the core capabilities of DMsan using an existing, conventional sanitation system and two proposed alternative systems for Bwaise, an informal settlement in Kampala, Uganda. The two example use cases are (i) use by implementation decision makers to enhance decision-making transparency and understand the robustness of sanitation choices given uncertain and/or varying stakeholder input and technology ability and (ii) use by technology developers seeking to identify and expand the opportunity space for their technologies. Through these examples, we demonstrate the utility of DMsan to evaluate sanitation and resource recovery systems tailored to individual contexts and increase transparency in technology evaluations, RD&D prioritization, and context-specific decision making. American Chemical Society 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10197171/ /pubmed/37215438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00067 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Lohman, Hannah A. C.
Morgan, Victoria L.
Li, Yalin
Zhang, Xinyi
Rowles, Lewis S.
Cook, Sherri M.
Guest, Jeremy S.
DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies
title DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies
title_full DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies
title_fullStr DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies
title_full_unstemmed DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies
title_short DMsan: A Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Framework and Package to Characterize Contextualized Sustainability of Sanitation and Resource Recovery Technologies
title_sort dmsan: a multi-criteria decision analysis framework and package to characterize contextualized sustainability of sanitation and resource recovery technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37215438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00067
work_keys_str_mv AT lohmanhannahac dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies
AT morganvictorial dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies
AT liyalin dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies
AT zhangxinyi dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies
AT rowleslewiss dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies
AT cooksherrim dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies
AT guestjeremys dmsanamulticriteriadecisionanalysisframeworkandpackagetocharacterizecontextualizedsustainabilityofsanitationandresourcerecoverytechnologies