Cargando…

Should we separately measure the pain parameter of the Constant-Murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain?

BACKGROUND: The Constant-Murley Score (CMS) is a relatively unique shoulder assessment tool because it combines patient-reported outcomes (pain and activity), performance measurement and clinician-reported outcomes (strength and mobility). With these characteristics, the effect of patient-related ps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pires Rodrigues, Gil Augusto, Vuistiner, Philippe, Burrus, Cyrille, Konzelmann, Michel, Léger, Bertrand, Luthi, François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06441-7
_version_ 1785044507796963328
author Pires Rodrigues, Gil Augusto
Vuistiner, Philippe
Burrus, Cyrille
Konzelmann, Michel
Léger, Bertrand
Luthi, François
author_facet Pires Rodrigues, Gil Augusto
Vuistiner, Philippe
Burrus, Cyrille
Konzelmann, Michel
Léger, Bertrand
Luthi, François
author_sort Pires Rodrigues, Gil Augusto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Constant-Murley Score (CMS) is a relatively unique shoulder assessment tool because it combines patient-reported outcomes (pain and activity), performance measurement and clinician-reported outcomes (strength and mobility). With these characteristics, the effect of patient-related psychological factors on the CMS remains debated. We aimed to investigate which parameters of the CMS are influenced by psychological factors by assessing the CMS before and after rehabilitation for chronic shoulder pain. METHODS: This retrospective study screened all patients (18–65 years old) who were admitted for interdisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic shoulder pain (≥ 3 months) between May 2012 and December 2017. Patients with unilateral shoulder injuries were eligible. Exclusion criteria were shoulder instability, concomitant neurological injuries, complex regional pain syndrome (including Steinbrocker syndrome), heavy psychiatric issues, and missing data. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing scale, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia were administered before and after treatment. Regression models were used to estimate associations between psychological factors and the CMS. RESULTS: We included 433 patients (88% male, mean age 47±11 years) with a median duration of symptoms of 392.2 days (interquartile range: 266.5-583.5). Rotator cuff issue was present in 71% of patients. During interdisciplinary rehabilitation, patients were followed for a mean of 33.6±7.5 days. The mean CMS at entry was 42.8 ±15.5. The mean gain in CMS after treatment was 10.6 ±10.9. Before treatment, psychological factors were significantly associated with only the pain CMS parameter: -0.37 (95% CI: -0.46 to -0.28), p <0.001. After treatment, psychological factors were associated with the evolution of the four CMS parameters: -0.12 (-0.23 to -0.01) to -0.26 (95% CI: -0.36 to -0.16), p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: This study raises the question of a distinct assessment of pain when assessing shoulder function with CMS in patients with chronic shoulder pain. The separation of the “pain parameter” from the overall CMS score seems illusory with this tool that is used worldwide. However, clinicians should be aware that psychological factors can negatively influence the evolution of all CMS parameters during follow-up, which argues for a biopsychosocial approach to patients with chronic shoulder pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06441-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10197235
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101972352023-05-20 Should we separately measure the pain parameter of the Constant-Murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain? Pires Rodrigues, Gil Augusto Vuistiner, Philippe Burrus, Cyrille Konzelmann, Michel Léger, Bertrand Luthi, François BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: The Constant-Murley Score (CMS) is a relatively unique shoulder assessment tool because it combines patient-reported outcomes (pain and activity), performance measurement and clinician-reported outcomes (strength and mobility). With these characteristics, the effect of patient-related psychological factors on the CMS remains debated. We aimed to investigate which parameters of the CMS are influenced by psychological factors by assessing the CMS before and after rehabilitation for chronic shoulder pain. METHODS: This retrospective study screened all patients (18–65 years old) who were admitted for interdisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic shoulder pain (≥ 3 months) between May 2012 and December 2017. Patients with unilateral shoulder injuries were eligible. Exclusion criteria were shoulder instability, concomitant neurological injuries, complex regional pain syndrome (including Steinbrocker syndrome), heavy psychiatric issues, and missing data. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing scale, and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia were administered before and after treatment. Regression models were used to estimate associations between psychological factors and the CMS. RESULTS: We included 433 patients (88% male, mean age 47±11 years) with a median duration of symptoms of 392.2 days (interquartile range: 266.5-583.5). Rotator cuff issue was present in 71% of patients. During interdisciplinary rehabilitation, patients were followed for a mean of 33.6±7.5 days. The mean CMS at entry was 42.8 ±15.5. The mean gain in CMS after treatment was 10.6 ±10.9. Before treatment, psychological factors were significantly associated with only the pain CMS parameter: -0.37 (95% CI: -0.46 to -0.28), p <0.001. After treatment, psychological factors were associated with the evolution of the four CMS parameters: -0.12 (-0.23 to -0.01) to -0.26 (95% CI: -0.36 to -0.16), p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: This study raises the question of a distinct assessment of pain when assessing shoulder function with CMS in patients with chronic shoulder pain. The separation of the “pain parameter” from the overall CMS score seems illusory with this tool that is used worldwide. However, clinicians should be aware that psychological factors can negatively influence the evolution of all CMS parameters during follow-up, which argues for a biopsychosocial approach to patients with chronic shoulder pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06441-7. BioMed Central 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10197235/ /pubmed/37202747 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06441-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pires Rodrigues, Gil Augusto
Vuistiner, Philippe
Burrus, Cyrille
Konzelmann, Michel
Léger, Bertrand
Luthi, François
Should we separately measure the pain parameter of the Constant-Murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain?
title Should we separately measure the pain parameter of the Constant-Murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain?
title_full Should we separately measure the pain parameter of the Constant-Murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain?
title_fullStr Should we separately measure the pain parameter of the Constant-Murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain?
title_full_unstemmed Should we separately measure the pain parameter of the Constant-Murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain?
title_short Should we separately measure the pain parameter of the Constant-Murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain?
title_sort should we separately measure the pain parameter of the constant-murley score in patients with chronic shoulder pain?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197235/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37202747
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06441-7
work_keys_str_mv AT piresrodriguesgilaugusto shouldweseparatelymeasurethepainparameteroftheconstantmurleyscoreinpatientswithchronicshoulderpain
AT vuistinerphilippe shouldweseparatelymeasurethepainparameteroftheconstantmurleyscoreinpatientswithchronicshoulderpain
AT burruscyrille shouldweseparatelymeasurethepainparameteroftheconstantmurleyscoreinpatientswithchronicshoulderpain
AT konzelmannmichel shouldweseparatelymeasurethepainparameteroftheconstantmurleyscoreinpatientswithchronicshoulderpain
AT legerbertrand shouldweseparatelymeasurethepainparameteroftheconstantmurleyscoreinpatientswithchronicshoulderpain
AT luthifrancois shouldweseparatelymeasurethepainparameteroftheconstantmurleyscoreinpatientswithchronicshoulderpain