Cargando…

Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies

Anti-deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) antibodies in the clinical laboratory are intimately linked to the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, the characteristics of the analytical methods and the properties of the antibodies themselves are heterogeneous. To review the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: González Rodríguez, Concepción, Aparicio Hernández, MªBelén, Alarcón Torres, Inmaculada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2021-0008
_version_ 1785044536169332736
author González Rodríguez, Concepción
Aparicio Hernández, MªBelén
Alarcón Torres, Inmaculada
author_facet González Rodríguez, Concepción
Aparicio Hernández, MªBelén
Alarcón Torres, Inmaculada
author_sort González Rodríguez, Concepción
collection PubMed
description Anti-deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) antibodies in the clinical laboratory are intimately linked to the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, the characteristics of the analytical methods and the properties of the antibodies themselves are heterogeneous. To review the definition and properties of anti-double-stranded anti-DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies, the adequacy of analytical methods, and the clinical requirements for this biomarker. Through PubMed we searched the existing literature with the terms anti-dsDNA, editorial, review, guideline, meta-analysis and SLE. The last search, anti-dsDNA and SLE restricted to the last two years. Information was expanded through related articles and those published in official state bodies related to anti-dsDNA and SLE. Clinical laboratory methods for anti-dsDNA analysis and their characteristics are analyze. The clinical utility of anti-dsDNA in its diagnostic, clinical association and follow-up aspects of SLE is reviewed. There is wide variability in analytical methods and deficits in standardization persist. They are part of the current SLE classification criteria and are used as markers in the follow-up of the disease. Their diagnostic usefulness improves when they are determined in antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive patients. In follow-up, quantification is of interest, preferably with the same analytical method (given the deficits in standardization).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10197362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101973622023-06-23 Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies González Rodríguez, Concepción Aparicio Hernández, MªBelén Alarcón Torres, Inmaculada Adv Lab Med Review Anti-deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) antibodies in the clinical laboratory are intimately linked to the diagnosis and monitoring of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, the characteristics of the analytical methods and the properties of the antibodies themselves are heterogeneous. To review the definition and properties of anti-double-stranded anti-DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies, the adequacy of analytical methods, and the clinical requirements for this biomarker. Through PubMed we searched the existing literature with the terms anti-dsDNA, editorial, review, guideline, meta-analysis and SLE. The last search, anti-dsDNA and SLE restricted to the last two years. Information was expanded through related articles and those published in official state bodies related to anti-dsDNA and SLE. Clinical laboratory methods for anti-dsDNA analysis and their characteristics are analyze. The clinical utility of anti-dsDNA in its diagnostic, clinical association and follow-up aspects of SLE is reviewed. There is wide variability in analytical methods and deficits in standardization persist. They are part of the current SLE classification criteria and are used as markers in the follow-up of the disease. Their diagnostic usefulness improves when they are determined in antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive patients. In follow-up, quantification is of interest, preferably with the same analytical method (given the deficits in standardization). De Gruyter 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10197362/ /pubmed/37362416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2021-0008 Text en © 2021 Concepción González Rodríguez et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Review
González Rodríguez, Concepción
Aparicio Hernández, MªBelén
Alarcón Torres, Inmaculada
Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies
title Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies
title_full Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies
title_fullStr Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies
title_full_unstemmed Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies
title_short Update and clinical management of anti-DNA auto-antibodies
title_sort update and clinical management of anti-dna auto-antibodies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2021-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezrodriguezconcepcion updateandclinicalmanagementofantidnaautoantibodies
AT apariciohernandezmabelen updateandclinicalmanagementofantidnaautoantibodies
AT alarcontorresinmaculada updateandclinicalmanagementofantidnaautoantibodies