Cargando…

Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory

OBJECTIVES: Change limits, more commonly called delta check, are those in which a change in a patient’s measured result in relation to their corresponding preceding measurement is suspected of being erroneous and should be considered as a doubtful result. The aim of this study was to provide change...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castro-Castro, Maria-José, Sánchez-Navarro, Lourdes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0114
_version_ 1785044558797602816
author Castro-Castro, Maria-José
Sánchez-Navarro, Lourdes
author_facet Castro-Castro, Maria-José
Sánchez-Navarro, Lourdes
author_sort Castro-Castro, Maria-José
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Change limits, more commonly called delta check, are those in which a change in a patient’s measured result in relation to their corresponding preceding measurement is suspected of being erroneous and should be considered as a doubtful result. The aim of this study was to provide change limits for some biochemical and haematological quantities to detect doubtful measured results and to assess its effectiveness to detect erroneous results for their application in and the standardization of the plausibility control. METHODS: Change limits have been estimated for 13 biochemical and 6 haematological quantities. For each quantity, relative differences (D), expressed as a percentage between the two consecutive measured results from the same patient (from scheduled laboratory requests), were calculated. From these differences (D), the p5 and p95 percentiles of the data distribution were calculated. To assess the effectiveness of the change limits to detect laboratory errors, 43 erroneous laboratory reports, containing different biochemical and haematological quantities, were obtained from the standard laboratory plausibility control procedure. RESULTS: From the 43 erroneous laboratory reports, 31 (72%) were due to endovenous administration errors and 12 (28%) were due to mislabeling errors. All erroneous laboratory reports were detected when the change limits of the quantities were combined and applied together. CONCLUSIONS: The best combination of quantities, which detect all the erroneous reports in the same specimen were: potassium, albumin, creatinine, glucose and haemoglobin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10197470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101974702023-06-23 Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory Castro-Castro, Maria-José Sánchez-Navarro, Lourdes Adv Lab Med Article OBJECTIVES: Change limits, more commonly called delta check, are those in which a change in a patient’s measured result in relation to their corresponding preceding measurement is suspected of being erroneous and should be considered as a doubtful result. The aim of this study was to provide change limits for some biochemical and haematological quantities to detect doubtful measured results and to assess its effectiveness to detect erroneous results for their application in and the standardization of the plausibility control. METHODS: Change limits have been estimated for 13 biochemical and 6 haematological quantities. For each quantity, relative differences (D), expressed as a percentage between the two consecutive measured results from the same patient (from scheduled laboratory requests), were calculated. From these differences (D), the p5 and p95 percentiles of the data distribution were calculated. To assess the effectiveness of the change limits to detect laboratory errors, 43 erroneous laboratory reports, containing different biochemical and haematological quantities, were obtained from the standard laboratory plausibility control procedure. RESULTS: From the 43 erroneous laboratory reports, 31 (72%) were due to endovenous administration errors and 12 (28%) were due to mislabeling errors. All erroneous laboratory reports were detected when the change limits of the quantities were combined and applied together. CONCLUSIONS: The best combination of quantities, which detect all the erroneous reports in the same specimen were: potassium, albumin, creatinine, glucose and haemoglobin. De Gruyter 2021-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10197470/ /pubmed/37362413 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0114 Text en © 2021 Maria-José Castro-Castro and Lourdes Sánchez-Navarro, published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Castro-Castro, Maria-José
Sánchez-Navarro, Lourdes
Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory
title Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory
title_full Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory
title_fullStr Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory
title_short Estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory
title_sort estimation of change limits (deltacheck) in clinical laboratory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37362413
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0114
work_keys_str_mv AT castrocastromariajose estimationofchangelimitsdeltacheckinclinicallaboratory
AT sancheznavarrolourdes estimationofchangelimitsdeltacheckinclinicallaboratory