Cargando…
The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1 |
_version_ | 1785044563024412672 |
---|---|
author | Lampl, Christian MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Jassal, Tanvir Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan Zeraatkar, Dena Sacco, Simona |
author_facet | Lampl, Christian MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Jassal, Tanvir Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan Zeraatkar, Dena Sacco, Simona |
author_sort | Lampl, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: (CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10197489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101974892023-05-20 The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Lampl, Christian MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Jassal, Tanvir Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan Zeraatkar, Dena Sacco, Simona J Headache Pain Research OBJECTIVE: While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: (CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1. Springer Milan 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10197489/ /pubmed/37208596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lampl, Christian MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Jassal, Tanvir Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan Zeraatkar, Dena Sacco, Simona The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamplchristian thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT maassenvandenbrinkantoinette thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT deligiannichristinai thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT gilgouveiaraquel thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jassaltanvir thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT sanchezdelriomargarita thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT reuteruwe thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT uluduzderya thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT versijptjan thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zeraatkardena thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT saccosimona thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT lamplchristian comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT maassenvandenbrinkantoinette comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT deligiannichristinai comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT gilgouveiaraquel comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT jassaltanvir comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT sanchezdelriomargarita comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT reuteruwe comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT uluduzderya comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT versijptjan comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zeraatkardena comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT saccosimona comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |