Cargando…

The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lampl, Christian, MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette, Deligianni, Christina I., Gil-Gouveia, Raquel, Jassal, Tanvir, Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita, Reuter, Uwe, Uluduz, Derya, Versijpt, Jan, Zeraatkar, Dena, Sacco, Simona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1
_version_ 1785044563024412672
author Lampl, Christian
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Deligianni, Christina I.
Gil-Gouveia, Raquel
Jassal, Tanvir
Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita
Reuter, Uwe
Uluduz, Derya
Versijpt, Jan
Zeraatkar, Dena
Sacco, Simona
author_facet Lampl, Christian
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Deligianni, Christina I.
Gil-Gouveia, Raquel
Jassal, Tanvir
Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita
Reuter, Uwe
Uluduz, Derya
Versijpt, Jan
Zeraatkar, Dena
Sacco, Simona
author_sort Lampl, Christian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: (CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10197489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101974892023-05-20 The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Lampl, Christian MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette Deligianni, Christina I. Gil-Gouveia, Raquel Jassal, Tanvir Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita Reuter, Uwe Uluduz, Derya Versijpt, Jan Zeraatkar, Dena Sacco, Simona J Headache Pain Research OBJECTIVE: While there are several trials that support the efficacy of various drugs for migraine prophylaxis against placebo, there is limited evidence addressing the comparative safety and efficacy of these drugs. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to facilitate comparison between drugs for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to August 13, 2022, for randomized trials of pharmacological treatments for migraine prophylaxis in adults. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to screen references, extract data, and assess risk of bias. We performed a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis and rated the certainty (quality) of evidence as either high, moderate, low, or very low using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We identified 74 eligible trials, reporting on 32,990 patients. We found high certainty evidence that monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor (CGRP(r)mAbs), gepants, and topiramate increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo. We found moderate certainty evidence that beta-blockers, valproate, and amitriptyline increase the proportion of patients who experience a 50% or more reduction in monthly migraine days, and low certainty evidence that gabapentin may not be different from placebo. We found high certainty evidence that, compared to placebo, valproate and amitriptyline lead to substantial adverse events leading to discontinuation, moderate certainty evidence that topiramate, beta-blockers, and gabapentin increase adverse events leading to discontinuation, and moderate to high certainty evidence that (CGRP(r)mAbs) and gepants do not increase adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: (CGRP(r)mAbs) have the best safety and efficacy profile of all drugs for migraine prophylaxis, followed closely by gepants. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1. Springer Milan 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10197489/ /pubmed/37208596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lampl, Christian
MaassenVanDenBrink, Antoinette
Deligianni, Christina I.
Gil-Gouveia, Raquel
Jassal, Tanvir
Sanchez-del-Rio, Margarita
Reuter, Uwe
Uluduz, Derya
Versijpt, Jan
Zeraatkar, Dena
Sacco, Simona
The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short The comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-023-01594-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lamplchristian thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT maassenvandenbrinkantoinette thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT deligiannichristinai thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT gilgouveiaraquel thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jassaltanvir thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sanchezdelriomargarita thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT reuteruwe thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT uluduzderya thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT versijptjan thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zeraatkardena thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT saccosimona thecomparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT lamplchristian comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT maassenvandenbrinkantoinette comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT deligiannichristinai comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT gilgouveiaraquel comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT jassaltanvir comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT sanchezdelriomargarita comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT reuteruwe comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT uluduzderya comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT versijptjan comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zeraatkardena comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT saccosimona comparativeeffectivenessofmigrainepreventivedrugsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis