Cargando…
Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms
BACKGROUND: Double reading (DR) in screening mammography increases cancer detection and lowers recall rates, but has sustainability challenges due to workforce shortages. Artificial intelligence (AI) as an independent reader (IR) in DR may provide a cost-effective solution with the potential to impr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10890-7 |
_version_ | 1785044566571745280 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Nisha Ng, Annie Y. James, Jonathan J. Khara, Galvin Ambrózay, Éva Austin, Christopher C. Forrai, Gábor Fox, Georgia Glocker, Ben Heindl, Andreas Karpati, Edit Rijken, Tobias M. Venkataraman, Vignesh Yearsley, Joseph E. Kecskemethy, Peter D. |
author_facet | Sharma, Nisha Ng, Annie Y. James, Jonathan J. Khara, Galvin Ambrózay, Éva Austin, Christopher C. Forrai, Gábor Fox, Georgia Glocker, Ben Heindl, Andreas Karpati, Edit Rijken, Tobias M. Venkataraman, Vignesh Yearsley, Joseph E. Kecskemethy, Peter D. |
author_sort | Sharma, Nisha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Double reading (DR) in screening mammography increases cancer detection and lowers recall rates, but has sustainability challenges due to workforce shortages. Artificial intelligence (AI) as an independent reader (IR) in DR may provide a cost-effective solution with the potential to improve screening performance. Evidence for AI to generalise across different patient populations, screening programmes and equipment vendors, however, is still lacking. METHODS: This retrospective study simulated DR with AI as an IR, using data representative of real-world deployments (275,900 cases, 177,882 participants) from four mammography equipment vendors, seven screening sites, and two countries. Non-inferiority and superiority were assessed for relevant screening metrics. RESULTS: DR with AI, compared with human DR, showed at least non-inferior recall rate, cancer detection rate, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for each mammography vendor and site, and superior recall rate, specificity, and PPV for some. The simulation indicates that using AI would have increased arbitration rate (3.3% to 12.3%), but could have reduced human workload by 30.0% to 44.8%. CONCLUSIONS: AI has potential as an IR in the DR workflow across different screening programmes, mammography equipment and geographies, substantially reducing human reader workload while maintaining or improving standard of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN18056078 (20/03/2019; retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-10890-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10197505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101975052023-05-20 Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms Sharma, Nisha Ng, Annie Y. James, Jonathan J. Khara, Galvin Ambrózay, Éva Austin, Christopher C. Forrai, Gábor Fox, Georgia Glocker, Ben Heindl, Andreas Karpati, Edit Rijken, Tobias M. Venkataraman, Vignesh Yearsley, Joseph E. Kecskemethy, Peter D. BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Double reading (DR) in screening mammography increases cancer detection and lowers recall rates, but has sustainability challenges due to workforce shortages. Artificial intelligence (AI) as an independent reader (IR) in DR may provide a cost-effective solution with the potential to improve screening performance. Evidence for AI to generalise across different patient populations, screening programmes and equipment vendors, however, is still lacking. METHODS: This retrospective study simulated DR with AI as an IR, using data representative of real-world deployments (275,900 cases, 177,882 participants) from four mammography equipment vendors, seven screening sites, and two countries. Non-inferiority and superiority were assessed for relevant screening metrics. RESULTS: DR with AI, compared with human DR, showed at least non-inferior recall rate, cancer detection rate, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for each mammography vendor and site, and superior recall rate, specificity, and PPV for some. The simulation indicates that using AI would have increased arbitration rate (3.3% to 12.3%), but could have reduced human workload by 30.0% to 44.8%. CONCLUSIONS: AI has potential as an IR in the DR workflow across different screening programmes, mammography equipment and geographies, substantially reducing human reader workload while maintaining or improving standard of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN18056078 (20/03/2019; retrospectively registered). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-023-10890-7. BioMed Central 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10197505/ /pubmed/37208717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10890-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sharma, Nisha Ng, Annie Y. James, Jonathan J. Khara, Galvin Ambrózay, Éva Austin, Christopher C. Forrai, Gábor Fox, Georgia Glocker, Ben Heindl, Andreas Karpati, Edit Rijken, Tobias M. Venkataraman, Vignesh Yearsley, Joseph E. Kecskemethy, Peter D. Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms |
title | Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms |
title_full | Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms |
title_fullStr | Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms |
title_full_unstemmed | Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms |
title_short | Multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms |
title_sort | multi-vendor evaluation of artificial intelligence as an independent reader for double reading in breast cancer screening on 275,900 mammograms |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197505/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10890-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmanisha multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT nganniey multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT jamesjonathanj multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT kharagalvin multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT ambrozayeva multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT austinchristopherc multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT forraigabor multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT foxgeorgia multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT glockerben multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT heindlandreas multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT karpatiedit multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT rijkentobiasm multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT venkataramanvignesh multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT yearsleyjosephe multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms AT kecskemethypeterd multivendorevaluationofartificialintelligenceasanindependentreaderfordoublereadinginbreastcancerscreeningon275900mammograms |