Cargando…
Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing
Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.10.540136 |
_version_ | 1785044582160924672 |
---|---|
author | Cieslik, Edna C. Ullsperger, Markus Gell, Martin Eickhoff, Simon B. Langner, Robert |
author_facet | Cieslik, Edna C. Ullsperger, Markus Gell, Martin Eickhoff, Simon B. Langner, Robert |
author_sort | Cieslik, Edna C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here, activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were used to synthesize the neuroimaging literature on brain activity related to committing errors versus responding successfully in interference tasks and to test for commonalities and differences. The salience network and the temporoparietal junction were commonly recruited irrespective of whether responses were correct or incorrect, pointing towards a general involvement in coping with situations that call for increased cognitive control. The dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, posterior thalamus, and left superior frontal gyrus showed error-specific convergence, which underscores their consistent involvement when performance goals are not met. In contrast, successful responding revealed stronger convergence in the dorsal attention network and lateral prefrontal regions. Underrecruiting these regions in error trials may reflect failures in activating the task-appropriate stimulus-response contingencies necessary for successful response execution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10197606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101976062023-05-20 Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing Cieslik, Edna C. Ullsperger, Markus Gell, Martin Eickhoff, Simon B. Langner, Robert bioRxiv Article Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here, activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were used to synthesize the neuroimaging literature on brain activity related to committing errors versus responding successfully in interference tasks and to test for commonalities and differences. The salience network and the temporoparietal junction were commonly recruited irrespective of whether responses were correct or incorrect, pointing towards a general involvement in coping with situations that call for increased cognitive control. The dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, posterior thalamus, and left superior frontal gyrus showed error-specific convergence, which underscores their consistent involvement when performance goals are not met. In contrast, successful responding revealed stronger convergence in the dorsal attention network and lateral prefrontal regions. Underrecruiting these regions in error trials may reflect failures in activating the task-appropriate stimulus-response contingencies necessary for successful response execution. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10197606/ /pubmed/37214978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.10.540136 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. |
spellingShingle | Article Cieslik, Edna C. Ullsperger, Markus Gell, Martin Eickhoff, Simon B. Langner, Robert Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing |
title | Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing |
title_full | Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing |
title_fullStr | Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing |
title_short | Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing |
title_sort | success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.10.540136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cieslikednac successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing AT ullspergermarkus successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing AT gellmartin successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing AT eickhoffsimonb successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing AT langnerrobert successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing |