Cargando…

Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing

Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cieslik, Edna C., Ullsperger, Markus, Gell, Martin, Eickhoff, Simon B., Langner, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.10.540136
_version_ 1785044582160924672
author Cieslik, Edna C.
Ullsperger, Markus
Gell, Martin
Eickhoff, Simon B.
Langner, Robert
author_facet Cieslik, Edna C.
Ullsperger, Markus
Gell, Martin
Eickhoff, Simon B.
Langner, Robert
author_sort Cieslik, Edna C.
collection PubMed
description Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here, activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were used to synthesize the neuroimaging literature on brain activity related to committing errors versus responding successfully in interference tasks and to test for commonalities and differences. The salience network and the temporoparietal junction were commonly recruited irrespective of whether responses were correct or incorrect, pointing towards a general involvement in coping with situations that call for increased cognitive control. The dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, posterior thalamus, and left superior frontal gyrus showed error-specific convergence, which underscores their consistent involvement when performance goals are not met. In contrast, successful responding revealed stronger convergence in the dorsal attention network and lateral prefrontal regions. Underrecruiting these regions in error trials may reflect failures in activating the task-appropriate stimulus-response contingencies necessary for successful response execution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10197606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101976062023-05-20 Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing Cieslik, Edna C. Ullsperger, Markus Gell, Martin Eickhoff, Simon B. Langner, Robert bioRxiv Article Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here, activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were used to synthesize the neuroimaging literature on brain activity related to committing errors versus responding successfully in interference tasks and to test for commonalities and differences. The salience network and the temporoparietal junction were commonly recruited irrespective of whether responses were correct or incorrect, pointing towards a general involvement in coping with situations that call for increased cognitive control. The dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, posterior thalamus, and left superior frontal gyrus showed error-specific convergence, which underscores their consistent involvement when performance goals are not met. In contrast, successful responding revealed stronger convergence in the dorsal attention network and lateral prefrontal regions. Underrecruiting these regions in error trials may reflect failures in activating the task-appropriate stimulus-response contingencies necessary for successful response execution. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10197606/ /pubmed/37214978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.10.540136 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Cieslik, Edna C.
Ullsperger, Markus
Gell, Martin
Eickhoff, Simon B.
Langner, Robert
Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing
title Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing
title_full Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing
title_fullStr Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing
title_full_unstemmed Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing
title_short Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing
title_sort success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.10.540136
work_keys_str_mv AT cieslikednac successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing
AT ullspergermarkus successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing
AT gellmartin successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing
AT eickhoffsimonb successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing
AT langnerrobert successversusfailureincognitivecontrolmetaanalyticevidencefromneuroimagingstudiesonerrorprocessing