Cargando…

CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value

OBJECTIVES: Chosen cutoff for cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA 21-1) as a tumor biomarker considerably influences its diagnostic and prognostic usefulness. The aim of the present study is to determine an optimal cutoff value for diagnostic validity of CYFRA 21-1 by Lumipulse (®) technology in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles, Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus, Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel, Ramos-Corral, Raquel, Marquez-Lietor, Eva, Del Amo, Nazaret, Plata, Maria del Carmen, Guillén-Santos, Raquel, Arribas, Ignacio, Cava-Valenciano, Fernando
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: De Gruyter 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37360615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0005
_version_ 1785044591159803904
author Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles
Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus
Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel
Ramos-Corral, Raquel
Marquez-Lietor, Eva
Del Amo, Nazaret
Plata, Maria del Carmen
Guillén-Santos, Raquel
Arribas, Ignacio
Cava-Valenciano, Fernando
author_facet Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles
Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus
Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel
Ramos-Corral, Raquel
Marquez-Lietor, Eva
Del Amo, Nazaret
Plata, Maria del Carmen
Guillén-Santos, Raquel
Arribas, Ignacio
Cava-Valenciano, Fernando
author_sort Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Chosen cutoff for cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA 21-1) as a tumor biomarker considerably influences its diagnostic and prognostic usefulness. The aim of the present study is to determine an optimal cutoff value for diagnostic validity of CYFRA 21-1 by Lumipulse (®) technology in patients with suspected cancer and also to determine if CYFRA 21-1 levels provide prognostic value. METHODS: A consecutive 284 patients suggestive of malignant disease from six hospitals of Madrid were enrolled in a retrospective design. Optimal CYFRA 21-1 cutoff value was obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden test. The diagnostic validity was evaluated according to sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. The prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1 was checked using multiple logistic regression. Thirty-two diagnostic cancers were confirmed. RESULTS: The most optimal cutoff was 3.15 ng/mL. This cutoff showed a better specificity 93.63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.66–96.16), positive predictive value 60.98% (95% CI, 44.54–75.38) and positive likelihood ratio 12.65 (95% CI, 7.64–20.95) than the cutoff recommended by Fujirebio(®) (1.8 ng/mL) (specificity: 73.71% [95% CI, 67.72–78.95], positive predictive value: 29.79% [95% CI, 21.02–40.23] and positive likelihood ratio 3.43 [95% CI, 2.71–4.35]), improving the current diagnostic accuracy. In multivariate analysis, elevated levels of CYFRA 21-1 (>3.15 ng/mL) was confirmed as an unfavorable prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The best cutoff for CYFRA 21-1 obtained was 3.15 ng/mL in patients with suspected cancer. This new cutoff decreases the false positive rate and improves the diagnostic efficacy of CYFRA 21-1 as a tumor marker as well as its association with death events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10197668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher De Gruyter
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101976682023-06-23 CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel Ramos-Corral, Raquel Marquez-Lietor, Eva Del Amo, Nazaret Plata, Maria del Carmen Guillén-Santos, Raquel Arribas, Ignacio Cava-Valenciano, Fernando Adv Lab Med Article OBJECTIVES: Chosen cutoff for cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA 21-1) as a tumor biomarker considerably influences its diagnostic and prognostic usefulness. The aim of the present study is to determine an optimal cutoff value for diagnostic validity of CYFRA 21-1 by Lumipulse (®) technology in patients with suspected cancer and also to determine if CYFRA 21-1 levels provide prognostic value. METHODS: A consecutive 284 patients suggestive of malignant disease from six hospitals of Madrid were enrolled in a retrospective design. Optimal CYFRA 21-1 cutoff value was obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden test. The diagnostic validity was evaluated according to sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. The prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1 was checked using multiple logistic regression. Thirty-two diagnostic cancers were confirmed. RESULTS: The most optimal cutoff was 3.15 ng/mL. This cutoff showed a better specificity 93.63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.66–96.16), positive predictive value 60.98% (95% CI, 44.54–75.38) and positive likelihood ratio 12.65 (95% CI, 7.64–20.95) than the cutoff recommended by Fujirebio(®) (1.8 ng/mL) (specificity: 73.71% [95% CI, 67.72–78.95], positive predictive value: 29.79% [95% CI, 21.02–40.23] and positive likelihood ratio 3.43 [95% CI, 2.71–4.35]), improving the current diagnostic accuracy. In multivariate analysis, elevated levels of CYFRA 21-1 (>3.15 ng/mL) was confirmed as an unfavorable prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The best cutoff for CYFRA 21-1 obtained was 3.15 ng/mL in patients with suspected cancer. This new cutoff decreases the false positive rate and improves the diagnostic efficacy of CYFRA 21-1 as a tumor marker as well as its association with death events. De Gruyter 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10197668/ /pubmed/37360615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0005 Text en © 2020 Sonsoles Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles
Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus
Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel
Ramos-Corral, Raquel
Marquez-Lietor, Eva
Del Amo, Nazaret
Plata, Maria del Carmen
Guillén-Santos, Raquel
Arribas, Ignacio
Cava-Valenciano, Fernando
CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value
title CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value
title_full CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value
title_fullStr CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value
title_full_unstemmed CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value
title_short CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value
title_sort cyfra 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37360615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0005
work_keys_str_mv AT garciavaldecasasgayosonsoles cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT ruizalvarezmariajesus cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT gonzalezgaydaniel cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT ramoscorralraquel cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT marquezlietoreva cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT delamonazaret cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT platamariadelcarmen cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT guillensantosraquel cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT arribasignacio cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue
AT cavavalencianofernando cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue