Cargando…
CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value
OBJECTIVES: Chosen cutoff for cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA 21-1) as a tumor biomarker considerably influences its diagnostic and prognostic usefulness. The aim of the present study is to determine an optimal cutoff value for diagnostic validity of CYFRA 21-1 by Lumipulse (®) technology in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
De Gruyter
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37360615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0005 |
_version_ | 1785044591159803904 |
---|---|
author | Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel Ramos-Corral, Raquel Marquez-Lietor, Eva Del Amo, Nazaret Plata, Maria del Carmen Guillén-Santos, Raquel Arribas, Ignacio Cava-Valenciano, Fernando |
author_facet | Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel Ramos-Corral, Raquel Marquez-Lietor, Eva Del Amo, Nazaret Plata, Maria del Carmen Guillén-Santos, Raquel Arribas, Ignacio Cava-Valenciano, Fernando |
author_sort | Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Chosen cutoff for cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA 21-1) as a tumor biomarker considerably influences its diagnostic and prognostic usefulness. The aim of the present study is to determine an optimal cutoff value for diagnostic validity of CYFRA 21-1 by Lumipulse (®) technology in patients with suspected cancer and also to determine if CYFRA 21-1 levels provide prognostic value. METHODS: A consecutive 284 patients suggestive of malignant disease from six hospitals of Madrid were enrolled in a retrospective design. Optimal CYFRA 21-1 cutoff value was obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden test. The diagnostic validity was evaluated according to sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. The prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1 was checked using multiple logistic regression. Thirty-two diagnostic cancers were confirmed. RESULTS: The most optimal cutoff was 3.15 ng/mL. This cutoff showed a better specificity 93.63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.66–96.16), positive predictive value 60.98% (95% CI, 44.54–75.38) and positive likelihood ratio 12.65 (95% CI, 7.64–20.95) than the cutoff recommended by Fujirebio(®) (1.8 ng/mL) (specificity: 73.71% [95% CI, 67.72–78.95], positive predictive value: 29.79% [95% CI, 21.02–40.23] and positive likelihood ratio 3.43 [95% CI, 2.71–4.35]), improving the current diagnostic accuracy. In multivariate analysis, elevated levels of CYFRA 21-1 (>3.15 ng/mL) was confirmed as an unfavorable prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The best cutoff for CYFRA 21-1 obtained was 3.15 ng/mL in patients with suspected cancer. This new cutoff decreases the false positive rate and improves the diagnostic efficacy of CYFRA 21-1 as a tumor marker as well as its association with death events. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10197668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | De Gruyter |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101976682023-06-23 CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel Ramos-Corral, Raquel Marquez-Lietor, Eva Del Amo, Nazaret Plata, Maria del Carmen Guillén-Santos, Raquel Arribas, Ignacio Cava-Valenciano, Fernando Adv Lab Med Article OBJECTIVES: Chosen cutoff for cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA 21-1) as a tumor biomarker considerably influences its diagnostic and prognostic usefulness. The aim of the present study is to determine an optimal cutoff value for diagnostic validity of CYFRA 21-1 by Lumipulse (®) technology in patients with suspected cancer and also to determine if CYFRA 21-1 levels provide prognostic value. METHODS: A consecutive 284 patients suggestive of malignant disease from six hospitals of Madrid were enrolled in a retrospective design. Optimal CYFRA 21-1 cutoff value was obtained by receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden test. The diagnostic validity was evaluated according to sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. The prognostic value of CYFRA 21-1 was checked using multiple logistic regression. Thirty-two diagnostic cancers were confirmed. RESULTS: The most optimal cutoff was 3.15 ng/mL. This cutoff showed a better specificity 93.63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.66–96.16), positive predictive value 60.98% (95% CI, 44.54–75.38) and positive likelihood ratio 12.65 (95% CI, 7.64–20.95) than the cutoff recommended by Fujirebio(®) (1.8 ng/mL) (specificity: 73.71% [95% CI, 67.72–78.95], positive predictive value: 29.79% [95% CI, 21.02–40.23] and positive likelihood ratio 3.43 [95% CI, 2.71–4.35]), improving the current diagnostic accuracy. In multivariate analysis, elevated levels of CYFRA 21-1 (>3.15 ng/mL) was confirmed as an unfavorable prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The best cutoff for CYFRA 21-1 obtained was 3.15 ng/mL in patients with suspected cancer. This new cutoff decreases the false positive rate and improves the diagnostic efficacy of CYFRA 21-1 as a tumor marker as well as its association with death events. De Gruyter 2020-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10197668/ /pubmed/37360615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0005 Text en © 2020 Sonsoles Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Garcia-Valdecasas Gayo, Sonsoles Ruiz-Alvarez, Maria Jesus Gonzalez-Gay, Daniel Ramos-Corral, Raquel Marquez-Lietor, Eva Del Amo, Nazaret Plata, Maria del Carmen Guillén-Santos, Raquel Arribas, Ignacio Cava-Valenciano, Fernando CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value |
title | CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value |
title_full | CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value |
title_fullStr | CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value |
title_full_unstemmed | CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value |
title_short | CYFRA 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value |
title_sort | cyfra 21-1 in patients with suspected cancer: evaluation of an optimal cutoff to assess the diagnostic efficacy and prognostic value |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37360615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/almed-2020-0005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciavaldecasasgayosonsoles cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT ruizalvarezmariajesus cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT gonzalezgaydaniel cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT ramoscorralraquel cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT marquezlietoreva cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT delamonazaret cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT platamariadelcarmen cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT guillensantosraquel cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT arribasignacio cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue AT cavavalencianofernando cyfra211inpatientswithsuspectedcancerevaluationofanoptimalcutofftoassessthediagnosticefficacyandprognosticvalue |