Cargando…

Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to examine the survival rates of immediate implants placed in extraction sockets with chronic periapical pathology. METHODS: 69 patients and 124 immediate implants were included in the study. The patients included in the study were examined in 3 groups. Group 1:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çolak, Sefa, Demïrsoy, Mustafa Sami
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02986-0
_version_ 1785044627286392832
author Çolak, Sefa
Demïrsoy, Mustafa Sami
author_facet Çolak, Sefa
Demïrsoy, Mustafa Sami
author_sort Çolak, Sefa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to examine the survival rates of immediate implants placed in extraction sockets with chronic periapical pathology. METHODS: 69 patients and 124 immediate implants were included in the study. The patients included in the study were examined in 3 groups. Group 1: Patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology and immediate implant placement. Group 2: patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology, immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration. Group 3: Patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology, sinus lift procedure and immediate implant placement. In statistical analysis, t-test and Anova analysis were used in the evaluation of quantitative data, cross-tables and chi-square (χ2) test were used in the evaluation of classified qualitative data. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: It was observed that 116 (95.55%) of 124 implants were successful and 8 (4.45%) failed. The success rate was 97.2% in Group 1, 93.5% in Group 2 and 81.8% in Group 3. A significant correlation was found between the study groups and implant success in terms of χ2 test (p = 0.037). A significant relationship was found between smoking and success in terms of the χ2 test (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: High survival rates are observed for immediate implant placement in sockets with periapical pathology. The success rates observed in guided bone regenerations simultaneously with immediate implant placement are at satisfactory levels. In cases where simultaneous sinus lifting procedures are required, the success rates were observed to be significantly lower. In case of adequate curettage and debridement in sockets with periapical pathology, high implant survival rates are observed. As the complexity of the surgical procedure increases, treatment protocols may progress in safer ways.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10197846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101978462023-05-20 Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas Çolak, Sefa Demïrsoy, Mustafa Sami BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to examine the survival rates of immediate implants placed in extraction sockets with chronic periapical pathology. METHODS: 69 patients and 124 immediate implants were included in the study. The patients included in the study were examined in 3 groups. Group 1: Patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology and immediate implant placement. Group 2: patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology, immediate implant placement and guided bone regeneration. Group 3: Patients who underwent tooth extraction with periapical pathology, sinus lift procedure and immediate implant placement. In statistical analysis, t-test and Anova analysis were used in the evaluation of quantitative data, cross-tables and chi-square (χ2) test were used in the evaluation of classified qualitative data. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: It was observed that 116 (95.55%) of 124 implants were successful and 8 (4.45%) failed. The success rate was 97.2% in Group 1, 93.5% in Group 2 and 81.8% in Group 3. A significant correlation was found between the study groups and implant success in terms of χ2 test (p = 0.037). A significant relationship was found between smoking and success in terms of the χ2 test (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: High survival rates are observed for immediate implant placement in sockets with periapical pathology. The success rates observed in guided bone regenerations simultaneously with immediate implant placement are at satisfactory levels. In cases where simultaneous sinus lifting procedures are required, the success rates were observed to be significantly lower. In case of adequate curettage and debridement in sockets with periapical pathology, high implant survival rates are observed. As the complexity of the surgical procedure increases, treatment protocols may progress in safer ways. BioMed Central 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10197846/ /pubmed/37208620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02986-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Çolak, Sefa
Demïrsoy, Mustafa Sami
Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas
title Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas
title_full Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas
title_fullStr Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas
title_short Retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas
title_sort retrospective analysis of dental implants immediately placed in extraction sockets with periapical pathology: immediate implant placement in infected areas
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10197846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02986-0
work_keys_str_mv AT colaksefa retrospectiveanalysisofdentalimplantsimmediatelyplacedinextractionsocketswithperiapicalpathologyimmediateimplantplacementininfectedareas
AT demirsoymustafasami retrospectiveanalysisofdentalimplantsimmediatelyplacedinextractionsocketswithperiapicalpathologyimmediateimplantplacementininfectedareas