Cargando…

Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies investigating the relationship between intake of different types of fruit and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk have yielded inconsistent results. AIM: To perform a meta-analysis of existing studies to assess the association between the intake of different kinds of fruit and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zhen-Ying, Chen, Jia-Li, Li, Han, Su, Ke, Han, Yun-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2679
_version_ 1785044668900179968
author Wu, Zhen-Ying
Chen, Jia-Li
Li, Han
Su, Ke
Han, Yun-Wei
author_facet Wu, Zhen-Ying
Chen, Jia-Li
Li, Han
Su, Ke
Han, Yun-Wei
author_sort Wu, Zhen-Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple studies investigating the relationship between intake of different types of fruit and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk have yielded inconsistent results. AIM: To perform a meta-analysis of existing studies to assess the association between the intake of different kinds of fruit and the incidence of CRC. METHODS: We searched online literature databases including PubMed, Embase, WOS, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles available up to August 2022. With data extracted from observational studies, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed using random-effects models. A funnel plot and Egger’s test were used to determine publication bias. Furthermore, subgroup analysis and dose-response analysis were performed. All analyses were conducted using R (version 4.1.3). RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible studies involving 1068158 participants were included in this review. The meta-analysis showed that compared to a low intake, a higher intake of citrus, apples, watermelon, and kiwi reduced the risk of CRC by 9% [OR (95%CI) = 0.91 (0.85-0.97)], 25% [OR (95%CI) = 0.75 (0.66-0.85)], 26% [OR (95%CI) = 0.74 (0.58-0.94)], 13% [OR (95%CI) = 0.87 (0.78-0.96)], respectively. No significant association was observed between the intake of other types of fruit and the risk of CRC. In the dose-response analysis, a nonlinear association was found [R (95%CI) = -0.0031 (-0.0047 to -0.0014)] between citrus intake and CRC risk (P < 0.001), with the risk minimized around 120 g/d (OR = 0.85), while no significant dose-response correlation was observed after continued increase in intake. CONCLUSION: We found that a higher intake of citrus, apples, watermelon, and kiwi was negatively associated with the risk of CRC, while the intake of other types of fruits were not significantly associated with CRC. Citrus intake showed a non-linear dose-response relationship with the risk of CRC. This meta-analysis provides further evidence that a higher intake of specific types of fruit is effective in preventing the occurrence of CRC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101980592023-05-20 Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies Wu, Zhen-Ying Chen, Jia-Li Li, Han Su, Ke Han, Yun-Wei World J Gastroenterol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Multiple studies investigating the relationship between intake of different types of fruit and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk have yielded inconsistent results. AIM: To perform a meta-analysis of existing studies to assess the association between the intake of different kinds of fruit and the incidence of CRC. METHODS: We searched online literature databases including PubMed, Embase, WOS, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles available up to August 2022. With data extracted from observational studies, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed using random-effects models. A funnel plot and Egger’s test were used to determine publication bias. Furthermore, subgroup analysis and dose-response analysis were performed. All analyses were conducted using R (version 4.1.3). RESULTS: Twenty-four eligible studies involving 1068158 participants were included in this review. The meta-analysis showed that compared to a low intake, a higher intake of citrus, apples, watermelon, and kiwi reduced the risk of CRC by 9% [OR (95%CI) = 0.91 (0.85-0.97)], 25% [OR (95%CI) = 0.75 (0.66-0.85)], 26% [OR (95%CI) = 0.74 (0.58-0.94)], 13% [OR (95%CI) = 0.87 (0.78-0.96)], respectively. No significant association was observed between the intake of other types of fruit and the risk of CRC. In the dose-response analysis, a nonlinear association was found [R (95%CI) = -0.0031 (-0.0047 to -0.0014)] between citrus intake and CRC risk (P < 0.001), with the risk minimized around 120 g/d (OR = 0.85), while no significant dose-response correlation was observed after continued increase in intake. CONCLUSION: We found that a higher intake of citrus, apples, watermelon, and kiwi was negatively associated with the risk of CRC, while the intake of other types of fruits were not significantly associated with CRC. Citrus intake showed a non-linear dose-response relationship with the risk of CRC. This meta-analysis provides further evidence that a higher intake of specific types of fruit is effective in preventing the occurrence of CRC. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-05-07 2023-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10198059/ /pubmed/37213399 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2679 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Wu, Zhen-Ying
Chen, Jia-Li
Li, Han
Su, Ke
Han, Yun-Wei
Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_full Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_fullStr Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_full_unstemmed Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_short Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies
title_sort different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of observational studies
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213399
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2679
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzhenying differenttypesoffruitintakeandcolorectalcancerriskametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT chenjiali differenttypesoffruitintakeandcolorectalcancerriskametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT lihan differenttypesoffruitintakeandcolorectalcancerriskametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT suke differenttypesoffruitintakeandcolorectalcancerriskametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT hanyunwei differenttypesoffruitintakeandcolorectalcancerriskametaanalysisofobservationalstudies