Cargando…

Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of the lumbosacral anomalies remains controversial. The existing classification to characterize these anomalies is more complex than necessary for clinical use. PURPOSE: To assessment of the prevalence of lumbosacral trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Byvaltsev, Vadim A., Kalinin, Andrei A., Shepelev, Valery V., Pestryakov, Yurii Ya., Aliyev, Marat A., Hozeev, Dmitriy V., Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y., Kundubayev, Rustem A., Riew, K. Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213577
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_149_22
_version_ 1785044701469999104
author Byvaltsev, Vadim A.
Kalinin, Andrei A.
Shepelev, Valery V.
Pestryakov, Yurii Ya.
Aliyev, Marat A.
Hozeev, Dmitriy V.
Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y.
Kundubayev, Rustem A.
Riew, K. Daniel
author_facet Byvaltsev, Vadim A.
Kalinin, Andrei A.
Shepelev, Valery V.
Pestryakov, Yurii Ya.
Aliyev, Marat A.
Hozeev, Dmitriy V.
Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y.
Kundubayev, Rustem A.
Riew, K. Daniel
author_sort Byvaltsev, Vadim A.
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of the lumbosacral anomalies remains controversial. The existing classification to characterize these anomalies is more complex than necessary for clinical use. PURPOSE: To assessment of the prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) in patients with low back pain and the development of clinically relevant classification to describe these anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period from 2007 to 2017, all cases of LSTV were preoperatively verified, and classified according to Castellvi, as well as O’Driscoll. We then developed modifications of those classifications that are simpler, easier to remember, and clinically relevant. At the surgical level, this was assessed intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration. RESULTS: The prevalence of the LSTV was 8.1% (389/4816). The most common L5 transverse process anomaly type was fused, unilaterally or bilaterally (48%), to the sacrum and were O’Driscoll's III (40.1%) and IV (35.8%). The most common type of S1-2 disc was a lumbarized disc (75.9%), where the disc's anterior-posterior diameter was equal to the L5-S1 disc diameter. In most cases, neurological compression symptoms (85.5%) were verified to be due to spinal stenosis (41.5%) or herniated disc (39.5%). In the majority of patients without neural compression, the clinical symptoms were due to mechanical back pain (58.8%). CONCLUSIONS: LSTV is a fairly common pathology of the lumbosacral junction, occurring in 8.1% of the patients in our series (389 out of 4,816 cases). The most common types were Castellvi's type IIA (30.9%) and IIIA (34.9%) and were O’Driscoll's III (40.1%) and IV (35.8%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101982192023-05-20 Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Shepelev, Valery V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Aliyev, Marat A. Hozeev, Dmitriy V. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y. Kundubayev, Rustem A. Riew, K. Daniel J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of the lumbosacral anomalies remains controversial. The existing classification to characterize these anomalies is more complex than necessary for clinical use. PURPOSE: To assessment of the prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) in patients with low back pain and the development of clinically relevant classification to describe these anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period from 2007 to 2017, all cases of LSTV were preoperatively verified, and classified according to Castellvi, as well as O’Driscoll. We then developed modifications of those classifications that are simpler, easier to remember, and clinically relevant. At the surgical level, this was assessed intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration. RESULTS: The prevalence of the LSTV was 8.1% (389/4816). The most common L5 transverse process anomaly type was fused, unilaterally or bilaterally (48%), to the sacrum and were O’Driscoll's III (40.1%) and IV (35.8%). The most common type of S1-2 disc was a lumbarized disc (75.9%), where the disc's anterior-posterior diameter was equal to the L5-S1 disc diameter. In most cases, neurological compression symptoms (85.5%) were verified to be due to spinal stenosis (41.5%) or herniated disc (39.5%). In the majority of patients without neural compression, the clinical symptoms were due to mechanical back pain (58.8%). CONCLUSIONS: LSTV is a fairly common pathology of the lumbosacral junction, occurring in 8.1% of the patients in our series (389 out of 4,816 cases). The most common types were Castellvi's type IIA (30.9%) and IIIA (34.9%) and were O’Driscoll's III (40.1%) and IV (35.8%). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10198219/ /pubmed/37213577 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_149_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Byvaltsev, Vadim A.
Kalinin, Andrei A.
Shepelev, Valery V.
Pestryakov, Yurii Ya.
Aliyev, Marat A.
Hozeev, Dmitriy V.
Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y.
Kundubayev, Rustem A.
Riew, K. Daniel
Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema
title Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema
title_full Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema
title_fullStr Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema
title_short Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema
title_sort prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: a computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213577
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_149_22
work_keys_str_mv AT byvaltsevvadima prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema
AT kalininandreia prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema
AT shepelevvaleryv prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema
AT pestryakovyuriiya prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema
AT aliyevmarata prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema
AT hozeevdmitriyv prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema
AT biryuchkovmikhaily prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema
AT kundubayevrustema prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema
AT riewkdaniel prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema