Cargando…
Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of the lumbosacral anomalies remains controversial. The existing classification to characterize these anomalies is more complex than necessary for clinical use. PURPOSE: To assessment of the prevalence of lumbosacral trans...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213577 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_149_22 |
_version_ | 1785044701469999104 |
---|---|
author | Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Shepelev, Valery V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Aliyev, Marat A. Hozeev, Dmitriy V. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y. Kundubayev, Rustem A. Riew, K. Daniel |
author_facet | Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Shepelev, Valery V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Aliyev, Marat A. Hozeev, Dmitriy V. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y. Kundubayev, Rustem A. Riew, K. Daniel |
author_sort | Byvaltsev, Vadim A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of the lumbosacral anomalies remains controversial. The existing classification to characterize these anomalies is more complex than necessary for clinical use. PURPOSE: To assessment of the prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) in patients with low back pain and the development of clinically relevant classification to describe these anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period from 2007 to 2017, all cases of LSTV were preoperatively verified, and classified according to Castellvi, as well as O’Driscoll. We then developed modifications of those classifications that are simpler, easier to remember, and clinically relevant. At the surgical level, this was assessed intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration. RESULTS: The prevalence of the LSTV was 8.1% (389/4816). The most common L5 transverse process anomaly type was fused, unilaterally or bilaterally (48%), to the sacrum and were O’Driscoll's III (40.1%) and IV (35.8%). The most common type of S1-2 disc was a lumbarized disc (75.9%), where the disc's anterior-posterior diameter was equal to the L5-S1 disc diameter. In most cases, neurological compression symptoms (85.5%) were verified to be due to spinal stenosis (41.5%) or herniated disc (39.5%). In the majority of patients without neural compression, the clinical symptoms were due to mechanical back pain (58.8%). CONCLUSIONS: LSTV is a fairly common pathology of the lumbosacral junction, occurring in 8.1% of the patients in our series (389 out of 4,816 cases). The most common types were Castellvi's type IIA (30.9%) and IIIA (34.9%) and were O’Driscoll's III (40.1%) and IV (35.8%). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10198219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101982192023-05-20 Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Shepelev, Valery V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Aliyev, Marat A. Hozeev, Dmitriy V. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y. Kundubayev, Rustem A. Riew, K. Daniel J Craniovertebr Junction Spine Original Article STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of the lumbosacral anomalies remains controversial. The existing classification to characterize these anomalies is more complex than necessary for clinical use. PURPOSE: To assessment of the prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) in patients with low back pain and the development of clinically relevant classification to describe these anomalies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period from 2007 to 2017, all cases of LSTV were preoperatively verified, and classified according to Castellvi, as well as O’Driscoll. We then developed modifications of those classifications that are simpler, easier to remember, and clinically relevant. At the surgical level, this was assessed intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration. RESULTS: The prevalence of the LSTV was 8.1% (389/4816). The most common L5 transverse process anomaly type was fused, unilaterally or bilaterally (48%), to the sacrum and were O’Driscoll's III (40.1%) and IV (35.8%). The most common type of S1-2 disc was a lumbarized disc (75.9%), where the disc's anterior-posterior diameter was equal to the L5-S1 disc diameter. In most cases, neurological compression symptoms (85.5%) were verified to be due to spinal stenosis (41.5%) or herniated disc (39.5%). In the majority of patients without neural compression, the clinical symptoms were due to mechanical back pain (58.8%). CONCLUSIONS: LSTV is a fairly common pathology of the lumbosacral junction, occurring in 8.1% of the patients in our series (389 out of 4,816 cases). The most common types were Castellvi's type IIA (30.9%) and IIIA (34.9%) and were O’Driscoll's III (40.1%) and IV (35.8%). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10198219/ /pubmed/37213577 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_149_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Byvaltsev, Vadim A. Kalinin, Andrei A. Shepelev, Valery V. Pestryakov, Yurii Ya. Aliyev, Marat A. Hozeev, Dmitriy V. Biryuchkov, Mikhail Y. Kundubayev, Rustem A. Riew, K. Daniel Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema |
title | Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema |
title_full | Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema |
title_short | Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: A computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema |
title_sort | prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra among 4816 consecutive patients with low back pain: a computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and plain radiographic study with novel classification schema |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213577 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_149_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT byvaltsevvadima prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema AT kalininandreia prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema AT shepelevvaleryv prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema AT pestryakovyuriiya prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema AT aliyevmarata prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema AT hozeevdmitriyv prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema AT biryuchkovmikhaily prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema AT kundubayevrustema prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema AT riewkdaniel prevalenceoflumbosacraltransitionalvertebraamong4816consecutivepatientswithlowbackpainacomputedtomographymagneticresonanceimagingandplainradiographicstudywithnovelclassificationschema |