Cargando…

An idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: Fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle

BACKGROUND: Cross leg free flaps are one of the salvage methods used for free tissue transfer in large tissue defects in the absence of recipient vessels. The fasciocutaneous flap above the posterior tibial artery can be harvested to protect the pedicle and to advance a distance to wound, which is e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaşar, Emrah Kağan, Demir, Can İlker, Tekfiliz, İsmail, Alagöz, Murat Şahin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kare Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36453792
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.97970
_version_ 1785044721315348480
author Yaşar, Emrah Kağan
Demir, Can İlker
Tekfiliz, İsmail
Alagöz, Murat Şahin
author_facet Yaşar, Emrah Kağan
Demir, Can İlker
Tekfiliz, İsmail
Alagöz, Murat Şahin
author_sort Yaşar, Emrah Kağan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cross leg free flaps are one of the salvage methods used for free tissue transfer in large tissue defects in the absence of recipient vessels. The fasciocutaneous flap above the posterior tibial artery can be harvested to protect the pedicle and to advance a distance to wound, which is equal to the length of fasciocutaneous flap. METHODS: Patients who were operated with cross leg free flap with the supporting fasciocutaneous flap on unwounded side were included in the study between years 2010 and 2020. Age, sex, location and size of the defects, arterial patencies, flap choices, fasciocutaneous flap size, duration of operation, cross flap separation timing, complications, and time to return to work were evaluated. RESULTS: There were six patients with the etiology of high-energy electrical burns and trauma. There was only one arterial refilling for three patients and no refilling for others. Latissimus dorsi skin muscle flap was used in all but one patient. The mean defect size was 6.6×14.8 cm. The mean size of fasciocutaneous flaps was 4.08×5 cm. The mean operation time was 360 min. There was no complication except one dehiscence and one marginal necrosis and infection which were healed with wound care. Average time to return to work was 9 months. CONCLUSION: In similar cases, as wounded lower extremities with one or no artery refill, harvesting a fasciocutaneous flap with recipient vessels will be useful before considering the option of using a bridge free flap in medium to moderate sized defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101983132023-06-02 An idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: Fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle Yaşar, Emrah Kağan Demir, Can İlker Tekfiliz, İsmail Alagöz, Murat Şahin Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: Cross leg free flaps are one of the salvage methods used for free tissue transfer in large tissue defects in the absence of recipient vessels. The fasciocutaneous flap above the posterior tibial artery can be harvested to protect the pedicle and to advance a distance to wound, which is equal to the length of fasciocutaneous flap. METHODS: Patients who were operated with cross leg free flap with the supporting fasciocutaneous flap on unwounded side were included in the study between years 2010 and 2020. Age, sex, location and size of the defects, arterial patencies, flap choices, fasciocutaneous flap size, duration of operation, cross flap separation timing, complications, and time to return to work were evaluated. RESULTS: There were six patients with the etiology of high-energy electrical burns and trauma. There was only one arterial refilling for three patients and no refilling for others. Latissimus dorsi skin muscle flap was used in all but one patient. The mean defect size was 6.6×14.8 cm. The mean size of fasciocutaneous flaps was 4.08×5 cm. The mean operation time was 360 min. There was no complication except one dehiscence and one marginal necrosis and infection which were healed with wound care. Average time to return to work was 9 months. CONCLUSION: In similar cases, as wounded lower extremities with one or no artery refill, harvesting a fasciocutaneous flap with recipient vessels will be useful before considering the option of using a bridge free flap in medium to moderate sized defects. Kare Publishing 2022-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10198313/ /pubmed/36453792 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.97970 Text en Copyright © 2022 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Original Article
Yaşar, Emrah Kağan
Demir, Can İlker
Tekfiliz, İsmail
Alagöz, Murat Şahin
An idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: Fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle
title An idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: Fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle
title_full An idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: Fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle
title_fullStr An idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: Fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle
title_full_unstemmed An idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: Fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle
title_short An idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: Fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle
title_sort idea for bringing the recipient pedicle of cross leg free flap closer: fasciocutaneous flap above pedicle
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36453792
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.97970
work_keys_str_mv AT yasaremrahkagan anideaforbringingtherecipientpedicleofcrosslegfreeflapcloserfasciocutaneousflapabovepedicle
AT demircanilker anideaforbringingtherecipientpedicleofcrosslegfreeflapcloserfasciocutaneousflapabovepedicle
AT tekfilizismail anideaforbringingtherecipientpedicleofcrosslegfreeflapcloserfasciocutaneousflapabovepedicle
AT alagozmuratsahin anideaforbringingtherecipientpedicleofcrosslegfreeflapcloserfasciocutaneousflapabovepedicle
AT yasaremrahkagan ideaforbringingtherecipientpedicleofcrosslegfreeflapcloserfasciocutaneousflapabovepedicle
AT demircanilker ideaforbringingtherecipientpedicleofcrosslegfreeflapcloserfasciocutaneousflapabovepedicle
AT tekfilizismail ideaforbringingtherecipientpedicleofcrosslegfreeflapcloserfasciocutaneousflapabovepedicle
AT alagozmuratsahin ideaforbringingtherecipientpedicleofcrosslegfreeflapcloserfasciocutaneousflapabovepedicle