Cargando…

Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia

OBJECTIVE: To assess the hearing benefit with a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in a cohort of children with unilateral aural atresia. METHODS: Cross-sectional case series pilot study involving 7 children (median age: 10 years, range 6-11). All patients underwent pure-tone, speech, aided soun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brotto, Davide, Sorrentino, Flavia, Cazzador, Diego, Maritan, Francesca, Montino, Silvia, Agostinelli, Anna, Zanoletti, Elisabetta, Martini, Alessandro, Bovo, Roberto, Trevisi, Patrizia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pacini Editore Srl 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37204847
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2271
_version_ 1785044733673865216
author Brotto, Davide
Sorrentino, Flavia
Cazzador, Diego
Maritan, Francesca
Montino, Silvia
Agostinelli, Anna
Zanoletti, Elisabetta
Martini, Alessandro
Bovo, Roberto
Trevisi, Patrizia
author_facet Brotto, Davide
Sorrentino, Flavia
Cazzador, Diego
Maritan, Francesca
Montino, Silvia
Agostinelli, Anna
Zanoletti, Elisabetta
Martini, Alessandro
Bovo, Roberto
Trevisi, Patrizia
author_sort Brotto, Davide
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the hearing benefit with a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in a cohort of children with unilateral aural atresia. METHODS: Cross-sectional case series pilot study involving 7 children (median age: 10 years, range 6-11). All patients underwent pure-tone, speech, aided sound field and aided speech audiometry and Simplified Italian Matrix Test (SIMT) with and without bone conduction hearing aid (Baha 5(®) CochlearTM). Cognitive abilities were assessed in 5 patients. RESULTS: The mean air conduction pure-tone average (PTA) of the atretic ear was 63.2 ± 6.9 dB, while the bone conduction PTA was 12.6 ± 4.7 dB. Speech discrimination score of the atretic ear was 88.6 ± 3.8 dB, while with the hearing aid it was 52.8 ± 1.9 dB. In the contralateral ear, there was no significant air-bone gap, and PTAs for air and bone conduction thresholds were within normal range (PTA ≤ 25 dB). The mean aided air conduction hearing threshold was 26.2 ± 7.97. Mean speech recognition threshold without the hearing aid was -5.1 ± 1.9 dB, and -6.0 ± 1.7 dB with the hearing aid tested with the SIMT. The mean score of the cognitive test was 46.8 ± 42.8. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings should encourage clinicians in proposing a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral atresia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Pacini Editore Srl
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101983642023-06-01 Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia Brotto, Davide Sorrentino, Flavia Cazzador, Diego Maritan, Francesca Montino, Silvia Agostinelli, Anna Zanoletti, Elisabetta Martini, Alessandro Bovo, Roberto Trevisi, Patrizia Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Otology OBJECTIVE: To assess the hearing benefit with a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in a cohort of children with unilateral aural atresia. METHODS: Cross-sectional case series pilot study involving 7 children (median age: 10 years, range 6-11). All patients underwent pure-tone, speech, aided sound field and aided speech audiometry and Simplified Italian Matrix Test (SIMT) with and without bone conduction hearing aid (Baha 5(®) CochlearTM). Cognitive abilities were assessed in 5 patients. RESULTS: The mean air conduction pure-tone average (PTA) of the atretic ear was 63.2 ± 6.9 dB, while the bone conduction PTA was 12.6 ± 4.7 dB. Speech discrimination score of the atretic ear was 88.6 ± 3.8 dB, while with the hearing aid it was 52.8 ± 1.9 dB. In the contralateral ear, there was no significant air-bone gap, and PTAs for air and bone conduction thresholds were within normal range (PTA ≤ 25 dB). The mean aided air conduction hearing threshold was 26.2 ± 7.97. Mean speech recognition threshold without the hearing aid was -5.1 ± 1.9 dB, and -6.0 ± 1.7 dB with the hearing aid tested with the SIMT. The mean score of the cognitive test was 46.8 ± 42.8. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings should encourage clinicians in proposing a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral atresia. Pacini Editore Srl 2023-06-01 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10198364/ /pubmed/37204847 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2271 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en
spellingShingle Otology
Brotto, Davide
Sorrentino, Flavia
Cazzador, Diego
Maritan, Francesca
Montino, Silvia
Agostinelli, Anna
Zanoletti, Elisabetta
Martini, Alessandro
Bovo, Roberto
Trevisi, Patrizia
Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia
title Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia
title_full Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia
title_fullStr Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia
title_full_unstemmed Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia
title_short Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia
title_sort benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia
topic Otology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37204847
http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2271
work_keys_str_mv AT brottodavide benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT sorrentinoflavia benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT cazzadordiego benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT maritanfrancesca benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT montinosilvia benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT agostinellianna benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT zanolettielisabetta benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT martinialessandro benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT bovoroberto benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia
AT trevisipatrizia benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia