Cargando…
Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia
OBJECTIVE: To assess the hearing benefit with a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in a cohort of children with unilateral aural atresia. METHODS: Cross-sectional case series pilot study involving 7 children (median age: 10 years, range 6-11). All patients underwent pure-tone, speech, aided soun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pacini Editore Srl
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37204847 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2271 |
_version_ | 1785044733673865216 |
---|---|
author | Brotto, Davide Sorrentino, Flavia Cazzador, Diego Maritan, Francesca Montino, Silvia Agostinelli, Anna Zanoletti, Elisabetta Martini, Alessandro Bovo, Roberto Trevisi, Patrizia |
author_facet | Brotto, Davide Sorrentino, Flavia Cazzador, Diego Maritan, Francesca Montino, Silvia Agostinelli, Anna Zanoletti, Elisabetta Martini, Alessandro Bovo, Roberto Trevisi, Patrizia |
author_sort | Brotto, Davide |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the hearing benefit with a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in a cohort of children with unilateral aural atresia. METHODS: Cross-sectional case series pilot study involving 7 children (median age: 10 years, range 6-11). All patients underwent pure-tone, speech, aided sound field and aided speech audiometry and Simplified Italian Matrix Test (SIMT) with and without bone conduction hearing aid (Baha 5(®) CochlearTM). Cognitive abilities were assessed in 5 patients. RESULTS: The mean air conduction pure-tone average (PTA) of the atretic ear was 63.2 ± 6.9 dB, while the bone conduction PTA was 12.6 ± 4.7 dB. Speech discrimination score of the atretic ear was 88.6 ± 3.8 dB, while with the hearing aid it was 52.8 ± 1.9 dB. In the contralateral ear, there was no significant air-bone gap, and PTAs for air and bone conduction thresholds were within normal range (PTA ≤ 25 dB). The mean aided air conduction hearing threshold was 26.2 ± 7.97. Mean speech recognition threshold without the hearing aid was -5.1 ± 1.9 dB, and -6.0 ± 1.7 dB with the hearing aid tested with the SIMT. The mean score of the cognitive test was 46.8 ± 42.8. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings should encourage clinicians in proposing a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral atresia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10198364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Pacini Editore Srl |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101983642023-06-01 Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia Brotto, Davide Sorrentino, Flavia Cazzador, Diego Maritan, Francesca Montino, Silvia Agostinelli, Anna Zanoletti, Elisabetta Martini, Alessandro Bovo, Roberto Trevisi, Patrizia Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Otology OBJECTIVE: To assess the hearing benefit with a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in a cohort of children with unilateral aural atresia. METHODS: Cross-sectional case series pilot study involving 7 children (median age: 10 years, range 6-11). All patients underwent pure-tone, speech, aided sound field and aided speech audiometry and Simplified Italian Matrix Test (SIMT) with and without bone conduction hearing aid (Baha 5(®) CochlearTM). Cognitive abilities were assessed in 5 patients. RESULTS: The mean air conduction pure-tone average (PTA) of the atretic ear was 63.2 ± 6.9 dB, while the bone conduction PTA was 12.6 ± 4.7 dB. Speech discrimination score of the atretic ear was 88.6 ± 3.8 dB, while with the hearing aid it was 52.8 ± 1.9 dB. In the contralateral ear, there was no significant air-bone gap, and PTAs for air and bone conduction thresholds were within normal range (PTA ≤ 25 dB). The mean aided air conduction hearing threshold was 26.2 ± 7.97. Mean speech recognition threshold without the hearing aid was -5.1 ± 1.9 dB, and -6.0 ± 1.7 dB with the hearing aid tested with the SIMT. The mean score of the cognitive test was 46.8 ± 42.8. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings should encourage clinicians in proposing a unilateral bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral atresia. Pacini Editore Srl 2023-06-01 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10198364/ /pubmed/37204847 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2271 Text en Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale, Rome, Italy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the CC-BY-NC-ND (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International) license. The article can be used by giving appropriate credit and mentioning the license, but only for non-commercial purposes and only in the original version. For further information: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en |
spellingShingle | Otology Brotto, Davide Sorrentino, Flavia Cazzador, Diego Maritan, Francesca Montino, Silvia Agostinelli, Anna Zanoletti, Elisabetta Martini, Alessandro Bovo, Roberto Trevisi, Patrizia Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia |
title | Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia |
title_full | Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia |
title_fullStr | Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia |
title_short | Benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia |
title_sort | benefits of bone conduction hearing aid in children with unilateral aural atresia |
topic | Otology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37204847 http://dx.doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2271 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brottodavide benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT sorrentinoflavia benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT cazzadordiego benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT maritanfrancesca benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT montinosilvia benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT agostinellianna benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT zanolettielisabetta benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT martinialessandro benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT bovoroberto benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia AT trevisipatrizia benefitsofboneconductionhearingaidinchildrenwithunilateralauralatresia |