Cargando…
A novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy
Background: Reconstruction after a total sacrectomy is a challenge due to the special anatomical and biomechanical factors. Conventional techniques of spinal-pelvic reconstruction do not reconstruct satisfactorily. We describe a novel three-dimensional-printed patient-specific sacral implant in spin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1153801 |
_version_ | 1785044742732513280 |
---|---|
author | Lv, Zhaorui Li, Jianmin Yang, Zhiping Li, Xin Yang, Qiang Li, Zhenfeng |
author_facet | Lv, Zhaorui Li, Jianmin Yang, Zhiping Li, Xin Yang, Qiang Li, Zhenfeng |
author_sort | Lv, Zhaorui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Reconstruction after a total sacrectomy is a challenge due to the special anatomical and biomechanical factors. Conventional techniques of spinal-pelvic reconstruction do not reconstruct satisfactorily. We describe a novel three-dimensional-printed patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 12 patients with primary malignant sacral tumors, including 5 men and 7 women with a mean age of 58.25 years (range 20–66 years), undergoing total en bloc sacrectomy with 3D printed implant reconstruction from 2016 to 2021. There were 7 cases of chordoma, 3 cases of osteosarcoma, 1 case of chondrosarcoma and 1 case of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. We use CAD technology to determine surgical resection boundaries, design cutting guides, and individualized prostheses, and perform surgical simulations before surgery. The implant design was biomechanically evaluated by finite element analysis. Operative data, oncological and functional outcomes, complications, and implant osseointegration status of 12 consecutive patients were reviewed. Results: The implants were implanted successfully in 12 cases without death or severe complications during the perioperative period. Resection margins were wide in 11 patients and marginal in one patient. The average blood loss was 3875 mL (range, 2000–5,000 mL). The average surgical time was 520 min (range, 380–735 min). The mean follow-up was 38.5 months. Nine patients were alive with no evidence of disease, two patients died due to pulmonary metastases, and one patient survived with disease due to local recurrence. Overall survival was 83.33% at 24 months. The Mean VAS was 1.5 (range, 0–2). The mean MSTS score was 21 (range, 17–24). Wound complications occurred in 2 cases. A deep infection occurred in one patient and the implant was removed. No implant mechanical failure was identified. Satisfactory osseointegration was found in all patients, with a mean fusion time of 5 months (range 3–6 months). Conclusion: The 3D-printed custom sacral prosthesis has been effective in reconstructing spinal-pelvic stability after total en bloc sacrectomy with satisfactory clinical outcomes, excellent osseointegration, and excellent durability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10198465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101984652023-05-20 A novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy Lv, Zhaorui Li, Jianmin Yang, Zhiping Li, Xin Yang, Qiang Li, Zhenfeng Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background: Reconstruction after a total sacrectomy is a challenge due to the special anatomical and biomechanical factors. Conventional techniques of spinal-pelvic reconstruction do not reconstruct satisfactorily. We describe a novel three-dimensional-printed patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including 12 patients with primary malignant sacral tumors, including 5 men and 7 women with a mean age of 58.25 years (range 20–66 years), undergoing total en bloc sacrectomy with 3D printed implant reconstruction from 2016 to 2021. There were 7 cases of chordoma, 3 cases of osteosarcoma, 1 case of chondrosarcoma and 1 case of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. We use CAD technology to determine surgical resection boundaries, design cutting guides, and individualized prostheses, and perform surgical simulations before surgery. The implant design was biomechanically evaluated by finite element analysis. Operative data, oncological and functional outcomes, complications, and implant osseointegration status of 12 consecutive patients were reviewed. Results: The implants were implanted successfully in 12 cases without death or severe complications during the perioperative period. Resection margins were wide in 11 patients and marginal in one patient. The average blood loss was 3875 mL (range, 2000–5,000 mL). The average surgical time was 520 min (range, 380–735 min). The mean follow-up was 38.5 months. Nine patients were alive with no evidence of disease, two patients died due to pulmonary metastases, and one patient survived with disease due to local recurrence. Overall survival was 83.33% at 24 months. The Mean VAS was 1.5 (range, 0–2). The mean MSTS score was 21 (range, 17–24). Wound complications occurred in 2 cases. A deep infection occurred in one patient and the implant was removed. No implant mechanical failure was identified. Satisfactory osseointegration was found in all patients, with a mean fusion time of 5 months (range 3–6 months). Conclusion: The 3D-printed custom sacral prosthesis has been effective in reconstructing spinal-pelvic stability after total en bloc sacrectomy with satisfactory clinical outcomes, excellent osseointegration, and excellent durability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10198465/ /pubmed/37214294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1153801 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lv, Li, Yang, Li, Yang and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Lv, Zhaorui Li, Jianmin Yang, Zhiping Li, Xin Yang, Qiang Li, Zhenfeng A novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy |
title | A novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy |
title_full | A novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy |
title_fullStr | A novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | A novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy |
title_short | A novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy |
title_sort | novel three dimensional-printed biomechanically evaluated patient-specific sacral implant in spinopelvic reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214294 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1153801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lvzhaorui anovelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT lijianmin anovelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT yangzhiping anovelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT lixin anovelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT yangqiang anovelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT lizhenfeng anovelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT lvzhaorui novelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT lijianmin novelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT yangzhiping novelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT lixin novelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT yangqiang novelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy AT lizhenfeng novelthreedimensionalprintedbiomechanicallyevaluatedpatientspecificsacralimplantinspinopelvicreconstructionaftertotalenblocsacrectomy |