Cargando…

Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare

OBJECTIVE: Clinical prediction models providing binary categorizations for clinical decision support require the selection of a probability threshold, or “cutpoint,” to classify individuals. Existing cutpoint selection approaches typically optimize test-specific metrics, including sensitivity and sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parsons, Rex, Blythe, Robin, Cramb, Susanna M, McPhail, Steven M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36970849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad042
_version_ 1785044754123194368
author Parsons, Rex
Blythe, Robin
Cramb, Susanna M
McPhail, Steven M
author_facet Parsons, Rex
Blythe, Robin
Cramb, Susanna M
McPhail, Steven M
author_sort Parsons, Rex
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Clinical prediction models providing binary categorizations for clinical decision support require the selection of a probability threshold, or “cutpoint,” to classify individuals. Existing cutpoint selection approaches typically optimize test-specific metrics, including sensitivity and specificity, but overlook the consequences of correct or incorrect classification. We introduce a new cutpoint selection approach considering downstream consequences using net monetary benefit (NMB) and through simulations compared it with alternative approaches in 2 use-cases: (i) preventing intensive care unit readmission and (ii) preventing inpatient falls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parameter estimates for costs and effectiveness from prior studies were included in Monte Carlo simulations. For each use-case, we simulated the expected NMB resulting from the model-guided decision using a range of cutpoint selection approaches, including our new value-optimizing approach. Sensitivity analyses applied alternative event rates, model discrimination, and calibration performance. RESULTS: The proposed approach that considered expected downstream consequences was frequently NMB-maximizing compared with other methods. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that it was or closely tracked the optimal strategy under a range of scenarios. Under scenarios of relatively low event rates and discrimination that may be considered realistic for intensive care (prevalence = 0.025, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.70) and falls (prevalence = 0.036, AUC = 0.70), our proposed cutpoint method was either the best or similar to the best of the compared methods regarding NMB, and was robust to model miscalibration. DISCUSSION: Our results highlight the potential value of conditioning cutpoints on the implementation setting, particularly for rare and costly events, which are often the target of prediction model development research. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes a cutpoint selection method that may optimize clinical decision support systems toward value-based care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101985282023-05-20 Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare Parsons, Rex Blythe, Robin Cramb, Susanna M McPhail, Steven M J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: Clinical prediction models providing binary categorizations for clinical decision support require the selection of a probability threshold, or “cutpoint,” to classify individuals. Existing cutpoint selection approaches typically optimize test-specific metrics, including sensitivity and specificity, but overlook the consequences of correct or incorrect classification. We introduce a new cutpoint selection approach considering downstream consequences using net monetary benefit (NMB) and through simulations compared it with alternative approaches in 2 use-cases: (i) preventing intensive care unit readmission and (ii) preventing inpatient falls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Parameter estimates for costs and effectiveness from prior studies were included in Monte Carlo simulations. For each use-case, we simulated the expected NMB resulting from the model-guided decision using a range of cutpoint selection approaches, including our new value-optimizing approach. Sensitivity analyses applied alternative event rates, model discrimination, and calibration performance. RESULTS: The proposed approach that considered expected downstream consequences was frequently NMB-maximizing compared with other methods. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that it was or closely tracked the optimal strategy under a range of scenarios. Under scenarios of relatively low event rates and discrimination that may be considered realistic for intensive care (prevalence = 0.025, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.70) and falls (prevalence = 0.036, AUC = 0.70), our proposed cutpoint method was either the best or similar to the best of the compared methods regarding NMB, and was robust to model miscalibration. DISCUSSION: Our results highlight the potential value of conditioning cutpoints on the implementation setting, particularly for rare and costly events, which are often the target of prediction model development research. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes a cutpoint selection method that may optimize clinical decision support systems toward value-based care. Oxford University Press 2023-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10198528/ /pubmed/36970849 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad042 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Parsons, Rex
Blythe, Robin
Cramb, Susanna M
McPhail, Steven M
Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare
title Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare
title_full Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare
title_fullStr Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare
title_short Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare
title_sort integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36970849
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad042
work_keys_str_mv AT parsonsrex integratingeconomicconsiderationsintocutpointselectionmayhelpalignclinicaldecisionsupporttowardvaluebasedhealthcare
AT blytherobin integratingeconomicconsiderationsintocutpointselectionmayhelpalignclinicaldecisionsupporttowardvaluebasedhealthcare
AT crambsusannam integratingeconomicconsiderationsintocutpointselectionmayhelpalignclinicaldecisionsupporttowardvaluebasedhealthcare
AT mcphailstevenm integratingeconomicconsiderationsintocutpointselectionmayhelpalignclinicaldecisionsupporttowardvaluebasedhealthcare