Cargando…

Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice

OBJECTIVE: Sustainable investment in computerized decision support systems (CDSS) requires robust evaluation of their economic impacts compared with current clinical workflows. We reviewed current approaches used to evaluate the costs and consequences of CDSS in hospital settings and presented recom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: White, Nicole M, Carter, Hannah E, Kularatna, Sanjeewa, Borg, David N, Brain, David C, Tariq, Amina, Abell, Bridget, Blythe, Robin, McPhail, Steven M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36972263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad040
_version_ 1785044755612172288
author White, Nicole M
Carter, Hannah E
Kularatna, Sanjeewa
Borg, David N
Brain, David C
Tariq, Amina
Abell, Bridget
Blythe, Robin
McPhail, Steven M
author_facet White, Nicole M
Carter, Hannah E
Kularatna, Sanjeewa
Borg, David N
Brain, David C
Tariq, Amina
Abell, Bridget
Blythe, Robin
McPhail, Steven M
author_sort White, Nicole M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Sustainable investment in computerized decision support systems (CDSS) requires robust evaluation of their economic impacts compared with current clinical workflows. We reviewed current approaches used to evaluate the costs and consequences of CDSS in hospital settings and presented recommendations to improve the generalizability of future evaluations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review of peer-reviewed research articles published since 2010. Searches were completed in the PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases (last searched February 14, 2023). All studies reported the costs and consequences of a CDSS-based intervention compared with current hospital workflows. Findings were summarized using narrative synthesis. Individual studies were further appraised against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation and Reporting (CHEERS) 2022 checklist. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies published since 2010 were included. Studies evaluated CDSS for adverse event surveillance (5 studies), antimicrobial stewardship (4 studies), blood product management (8 studies), laboratory testing (7 studies), and medication safety (5 studies). All studies evaluated costs from a hospital perspective but varied based on the valuation of resources affected by CDSS implementation, and the measurement of consequences. We recommend future studies follow guidance from the CHEERS checklist; use study designs that adjust for confounders; consider both the costs of CDSS implementation and adherence; evaluate consequences that are directly or indirectly affected by CDSS-initiated behavior change; examine the impacts of uncertainty and differences in outcomes across patient subgroups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Improving consistency in the conduct and reporting of evaluations will enable detailed comparisons between promising initiatives, and their subsequent uptake by decision-makers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101985422023-05-20 Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice White, Nicole M Carter, Hannah E Kularatna, Sanjeewa Borg, David N Brain, David C Tariq, Amina Abell, Bridget Blythe, Robin McPhail, Steven M J Am Med Inform Assoc Review OBJECTIVE: Sustainable investment in computerized decision support systems (CDSS) requires robust evaluation of their economic impacts compared with current clinical workflows. We reviewed current approaches used to evaluate the costs and consequences of CDSS in hospital settings and presented recommendations to improve the generalizability of future evaluations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A scoping review of peer-reviewed research articles published since 2010. Searches were completed in the PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases (last searched February 14, 2023). All studies reported the costs and consequences of a CDSS-based intervention compared with current hospital workflows. Findings were summarized using narrative synthesis. Individual studies were further appraised against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation and Reporting (CHEERS) 2022 checklist. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies published since 2010 were included. Studies evaluated CDSS for adverse event surveillance (5 studies), antimicrobial stewardship (4 studies), blood product management (8 studies), laboratory testing (7 studies), and medication safety (5 studies). All studies evaluated costs from a hospital perspective but varied based on the valuation of resources affected by CDSS implementation, and the measurement of consequences. We recommend future studies follow guidance from the CHEERS checklist; use study designs that adjust for confounders; consider both the costs of CDSS implementation and adherence; evaluate consequences that are directly or indirectly affected by CDSS-initiated behavior change; examine the impacts of uncertainty and differences in outcomes across patient subgroups. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Improving consistency in the conduct and reporting of evaluations will enable detailed comparisons between promising initiatives, and their subsequent uptake by decision-makers. Oxford University Press 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10198542/ /pubmed/36972263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad040 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Review
White, Nicole M
Carter, Hannah E
Kularatna, Sanjeewa
Borg, David N
Brain, David C
Tariq, Amina
Abell, Bridget
Blythe, Robin
McPhail, Steven M
Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice
title Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice
title_full Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice
title_fullStr Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice
title_short Evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice
title_sort evaluating the costs and consequences of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36972263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocad040
work_keys_str_mv AT whitenicolem evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT carterhannahe evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT kularatnasanjeewa evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT borgdavidn evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT braindavidc evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT tariqamina evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT abellbridget evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT blytherobin evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice
AT mcphailstevenm evaluatingthecostsandconsequencesofcomputerizedclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsinhospitalsascopingreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice