Cargando…

Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy

Science is under attack and scientists are becoming more involved in efforts to defend it. The rise in science advocacy raises important questions regarding how science mobilization can both defend science and promote its use for the public good while also including the communities that benefit from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tormos-Aponte, Fernando, Brown, Phil, Dosemagen, Shannon, Fisher, Dana R., Frickel, Scott, MacKendrick, Norah, Meyer, David S., Parker, John N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for the Advancement of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq4899
_version_ 1785044773103468544
author Tormos-Aponte, Fernando
Brown, Phil
Dosemagen, Shannon
Fisher, Dana R.
Frickel, Scott
MacKendrick, Norah
Meyer, David S.
Parker, John N.
author_facet Tormos-Aponte, Fernando
Brown, Phil
Dosemagen, Shannon
Fisher, Dana R.
Frickel, Scott
MacKendrick, Norah
Meyer, David S.
Parker, John N.
author_sort Tormos-Aponte, Fernando
collection PubMed
description Science is under attack and scientists are becoming more involved in efforts to defend it. The rise in science advocacy raises important questions regarding how science mobilization can both defend science and promote its use for the public good while also including the communities that benefit from science. This article begins with a discussion of the relevance of science advocacy. It then reviews research pointing to how scientists can sustain, diversify, and increase the political impact of their mobilization. Scientists, we argue, can build and maintain politically impactful coalitions by engaging with and addressing social group differences and diversity instead of suppressing them. The article concludes with a reflection on how the study of science-related mobilization would benefit from further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association for the Advancement of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101986272023-05-20 Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy Tormos-Aponte, Fernando Brown, Phil Dosemagen, Shannon Fisher, Dana R. Frickel, Scott MacKendrick, Norah Meyer, David S. Parker, John N. Sci Adv Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences Science is under attack and scientists are becoming more involved in efforts to defend it. The rise in science advocacy raises important questions regarding how science mobilization can both defend science and promote its use for the public good while also including the communities that benefit from science. This article begins with a discussion of the relevance of science advocacy. It then reviews research pointing to how scientists can sustain, diversify, and increase the political impact of their mobilization. Scientists, we argue, can build and maintain politically impactful coalitions by engaging with and addressing social group differences and diversity instead of suppressing them. The article concludes with a reflection on how the study of science-related mobilization would benefit from further research. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10198627/ /pubmed/37205759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq4899 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences
Tormos-Aponte, Fernando
Brown, Phil
Dosemagen, Shannon
Fisher, Dana R.
Frickel, Scott
MacKendrick, Norah
Meyer, David S.
Parker, John N.
Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy
title Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy
title_full Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy
title_fullStr Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy
title_full_unstemmed Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy
title_short Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy
title_sort pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy
topic Social and Interdisciplinary Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37205759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq4899
work_keys_str_mv AT tormosapontefernando pathwaysfordiversifyingandenhancingscienceadvocacy
AT brownphil pathwaysfordiversifyingandenhancingscienceadvocacy
AT dosemagenshannon pathwaysfordiversifyingandenhancingscienceadvocacy
AT fisherdanar pathwaysfordiversifyingandenhancingscienceadvocacy
AT frickelscott pathwaysfordiversifyingandenhancingscienceadvocacy
AT mackendricknorah pathwaysfordiversifyingandenhancingscienceadvocacy
AT meyerdavids pathwaysfordiversifyingandenhancingscienceadvocacy
AT parkerjohnn pathwaysfordiversifyingandenhancingscienceadvocacy