Cargando…

The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Older adults in long term care (LTC) spend over 90% of their day engaging in sedentary behaviour. Sedentary behaviour may exacerbate functional decline and frailty, increasing the risk for falls. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of a 22-week standing intervention on fal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallibois, Molly, Handrigan, Grant, Caissie, Linda, Cooling, Kendra, Hébert, Jeffrey, Jarrett, Pamala, McGibbon, Chris, Read, Emily, Sénéchal, Martin, Bouchard, Danielle R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Canadian Geriatrics Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37265979
http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.656
_version_ 1785044785770266624
author Gallibois, Molly
Handrigan, Grant
Caissie, Linda
Cooling, Kendra
Hébert, Jeffrey
Jarrett, Pamala
McGibbon, Chris
Read, Emily
Sénéchal, Martin
Bouchard, Danielle R.
author_facet Gallibois, Molly
Handrigan, Grant
Caissie, Linda
Cooling, Kendra
Hébert, Jeffrey
Jarrett, Pamala
McGibbon, Chris
Read, Emily
Sénéchal, Martin
Bouchard, Danielle R.
author_sort Gallibois, Molly
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Older adults in long term care (LTC) spend over 90% of their day engaging in sedentary behaviour. Sedentary behaviour may exacerbate functional decline and frailty, increasing the risk for falls. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of a 22-week standing intervention on falls among LTC residents at 12-month follow-up. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of the Stand if You Can randomized controlled trial. The original trial randomized 95 participants (n = 47 control; n = 48 intervention) to either a sitting control or a supervised standing intervention group (100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks. Falls data were available to be collected over 12 months post-intervention for 89 participants. The primary outcome was a hazard of fall (Yes/No) during the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 89 participants (average age 86 years ± 8.05; 71.9% female) were followed for 12-months post-intervention. Participants in the intervention group (n=44) had a significantly greater hazard ratio of falls (2.01; 95% CI = 1.11 to 3.63) than the control group (n=45) when accounting for the history of falls, frailty status, cognition level, and sex. CONCLUSION: Participants who received a standing intervention over 22 weeks were twice as likely to fall 12 months after the intervention compared with the control group. However, the prevalence of falls did not surpass what would be typically observed in LTC facilities. It is imperative that future studies describe in detail the context in which falls happen and collect more characteristics of participants in the follow-up period to truly understand the association between standing more and the risk of falls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Canadian Geriatrics Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101986822023-06-01 The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial Gallibois, Molly Handrigan, Grant Caissie, Linda Cooling, Kendra Hébert, Jeffrey Jarrett, Pamala McGibbon, Chris Read, Emily Sénéchal, Martin Bouchard, Danielle R. Can Geriatr J Original Research BACKGROUND: Older adults in long term care (LTC) spend over 90% of their day engaging in sedentary behaviour. Sedentary behaviour may exacerbate functional decline and frailty, increasing the risk for falls. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of a 22-week standing intervention on falls among LTC residents at 12-month follow-up. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of the Stand if You Can randomized controlled trial. The original trial randomized 95 participants (n = 47 control; n = 48 intervention) to either a sitting control or a supervised standing intervention group (100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks. Falls data were available to be collected over 12 months post-intervention for 89 participants. The primary outcome was a hazard of fall (Yes/No) during the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 89 participants (average age 86 years ± 8.05; 71.9% female) were followed for 12-months post-intervention. Participants in the intervention group (n=44) had a significantly greater hazard ratio of falls (2.01; 95% CI = 1.11 to 3.63) than the control group (n=45) when accounting for the history of falls, frailty status, cognition level, and sex. CONCLUSION: Participants who received a standing intervention over 22 weeks were twice as likely to fall 12 months after the intervention compared with the control group. However, the prevalence of falls did not surpass what would be typically observed in LTC facilities. It is imperative that future studies describe in detail the context in which falls happen and collect more characteristics of participants in the follow-up period to truly understand the association between standing more and the risk of falls. Canadian Geriatrics Society 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10198682/ /pubmed/37265979 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.656 Text en © 2023 Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gallibois, Molly
Handrigan, Grant
Caissie, Linda
Cooling, Kendra
Hébert, Jeffrey
Jarrett, Pamala
McGibbon, Chris
Read, Emily
Sénéchal, Martin
Bouchard, Danielle R.
The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effect of a standing intervention on falls in long term care: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37265979
http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.656
work_keys_str_mv AT galliboismolly theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT handrigangrant theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT caissielinda theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coolingkendra theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hebertjeffrey theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jarrettpamala theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgibbonchris theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reademily theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT senechalmartin theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boucharddanieller theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT galliboismolly effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT handrigangrant effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT caissielinda effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coolingkendra effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hebertjeffrey effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jarrettpamala effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mcgibbonchris effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT reademily effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT senechalmartin effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT boucharddanieller effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial