Cargando…
The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Older adults in long term care (LTC) spend over 90% of their day engaging in sedentary behaviour. Sedentary behaviour may exacerbate functional decline and frailty, increasing the risk for falls. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of a 22-week standing intervention on fal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Canadian Geriatrics Society
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37265979 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.656 |
_version_ | 1785044785770266624 |
---|---|
author | Gallibois, Molly Handrigan, Grant Caissie, Linda Cooling, Kendra Hébert, Jeffrey Jarrett, Pamala McGibbon, Chris Read, Emily Sénéchal, Martin Bouchard, Danielle R. |
author_facet | Gallibois, Molly Handrigan, Grant Caissie, Linda Cooling, Kendra Hébert, Jeffrey Jarrett, Pamala McGibbon, Chris Read, Emily Sénéchal, Martin Bouchard, Danielle R. |
author_sort | Gallibois, Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Older adults in long term care (LTC) spend over 90% of their day engaging in sedentary behaviour. Sedentary behaviour may exacerbate functional decline and frailty, increasing the risk for falls. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of a 22-week standing intervention on falls among LTC residents at 12-month follow-up. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of the Stand if You Can randomized controlled trial. The original trial randomized 95 participants (n = 47 control; n = 48 intervention) to either a sitting control or a supervised standing intervention group (100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks. Falls data were available to be collected over 12 months post-intervention for 89 participants. The primary outcome was a hazard of fall (Yes/No) during the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 89 participants (average age 86 years ± 8.05; 71.9% female) were followed for 12-months post-intervention. Participants in the intervention group (n=44) had a significantly greater hazard ratio of falls (2.01; 95% CI = 1.11 to 3.63) than the control group (n=45) when accounting for the history of falls, frailty status, cognition level, and sex. CONCLUSION: Participants who received a standing intervention over 22 weeks were twice as likely to fall 12 months after the intervention compared with the control group. However, the prevalence of falls did not surpass what would be typically observed in LTC facilities. It is imperative that future studies describe in detail the context in which falls happen and collect more characteristics of participants in the follow-up period to truly understand the association between standing more and the risk of falls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10198682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Canadian Geriatrics Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101986822023-06-01 The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial Gallibois, Molly Handrigan, Grant Caissie, Linda Cooling, Kendra Hébert, Jeffrey Jarrett, Pamala McGibbon, Chris Read, Emily Sénéchal, Martin Bouchard, Danielle R. Can Geriatr J Original Research BACKGROUND: Older adults in long term care (LTC) spend over 90% of their day engaging in sedentary behaviour. Sedentary behaviour may exacerbate functional decline and frailty, increasing the risk for falls. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of a 22-week standing intervention on falls among LTC residents at 12-month follow-up. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of the Stand if You Can randomized controlled trial. The original trial randomized 95 participants (n = 47 control; n = 48 intervention) to either a sitting control or a supervised standing intervention group (100 minutes/week) for 22 weeks. Falls data were available to be collected over 12 months post-intervention for 89 participants. The primary outcome was a hazard of fall (Yes/No) during the 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 89 participants (average age 86 years ± 8.05; 71.9% female) were followed for 12-months post-intervention. Participants in the intervention group (n=44) had a significantly greater hazard ratio of falls (2.01; 95% CI = 1.11 to 3.63) than the control group (n=45) when accounting for the history of falls, frailty status, cognition level, and sex. CONCLUSION: Participants who received a standing intervention over 22 weeks were twice as likely to fall 12 months after the intervention compared with the control group. However, the prevalence of falls did not surpass what would be typically observed in LTC facilities. It is imperative that future studies describe in detail the context in which falls happen and collect more characteristics of participants in the follow-up period to truly understand the association between standing more and the risk of falls. Canadian Geriatrics Society 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10198682/ /pubmed/37265979 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.656 Text en © 2023 Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivative license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use and distribution, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gallibois, Molly Handrigan, Grant Caissie, Linda Cooling, Kendra Hébert, Jeffrey Jarrett, Pamala McGibbon, Chris Read, Emily Sénéchal, Martin Bouchard, Danielle R. The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | The Effect of a Standing Intervention on Falls in Long Term Care: a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effect of a standing intervention on falls in long term care: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37265979 http://dx.doi.org/10.5770/cgj.26.656 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galliboismolly theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT handrigangrant theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT caissielinda theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT coolingkendra theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hebertjeffrey theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jarrettpamala theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcgibbonchris theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reademily theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT senechalmartin theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT boucharddanieller theeffectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT galliboismolly effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT handrigangrant effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT caissielinda effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT coolingkendra effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hebertjeffrey effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jarrettpamala effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mcgibbonchris effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reademily effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT senechalmartin effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT boucharddanieller effectofastandinginterventiononfallsinlongtermcareasecondaryanalysisofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |