Cargando…

A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study

BACKGROUND: Silver ions act as potent antimicrobial agents. Silver coating of brackets and the archwires can help reduce the formation of white spot lesions and caries which is commonly seen with fixed orthodontic treatment. However, this may affect the friction and surface roughness of the bracket-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Pooja, Sharma, Padmaja, Naik, Harshit, Patel, Kalpesh, Panchal, Chetan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214744
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60357
_version_ 1785044787089375232
author Shah, Pooja
Sharma, Padmaja
Naik, Harshit
Patel, Kalpesh
Panchal, Chetan
author_facet Shah, Pooja
Sharma, Padmaja
Naik, Harshit
Patel, Kalpesh
Panchal, Chetan
author_sort Shah, Pooja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Silver ions act as potent antimicrobial agents. Silver coating of brackets and the archwires can help reduce the formation of white spot lesions and caries which is commonly seen with fixed orthodontic treatment. However, this may affect the friction and surface roughness of the bracket-wire assembly which in turn affects the biological tooth movement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 samples were included in the study which was divided into four groups. Group-1: • 15 silver coated 0.022 x 0.028” slot MBT prescription maxillary central incisor brackets • 15 silver coated 0.019 x 0.025” stainless-steel wires; Group-2: • 15 uncoated 0.022 x 0.028” slot MBT prescription maxillary central incisor brackets • 15 silver coated 0.019 x 0.025” stainless-steel wires; Group-3: • 15 silver coated 0.022 x 0.028” slot MBT prescription maxillary central incisor brackets • 15 uncoated 0.019 x 0.025” stainless-steel wires; Group-4: • 15 uncoated 0.022x0.028” slot MBT prescription maxillary central incisor brackets • 15 uncoated 0.019 x 0.025” stainless-steel wires. All brackets and wires used were of American Orthodontics, St. Paul, USA. Surface modification of wires and brackets was carried out using the Vacuum Coating Unit model by Thermal Vacuum Evaporation method with silver nanoparticles (10 nm size). The frictional resistance of all brackets and wires was checked using Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: On comparison of maximum load, it was found that friction was highest in group 3, followed by group 1, group 4 and group 2. The mean difference between all groups was found to be statistically significant with a P value < 0.05. The Scanning Electron Microscope studies showed that the surface roughness of silver-coated wires and brackets before the friction test was less compared to uncoated wire-bracket assembly. The surface roughness of the bracket and wire after the friction test was as follows: •Bracket roughness: Group 4> Group 1> Group 2> Group 3 •Wire roughness: Group 4> Group 1> Group 2> Group 3. CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that friction was least when only the wire was coated with silver and the bracket was uncoated and it was the most when the bracket was coated and the wire was uncoated. The surface roughness after the friction test was the least when the wire was uncoated. Key words:Silver nanoparticles, Frictional Resistance, Surface Roughness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101986872023-05-20 A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study Shah, Pooja Sharma, Padmaja Naik, Harshit Patel, Kalpesh Panchal, Chetan J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: Silver ions act as potent antimicrobial agents. Silver coating of brackets and the archwires can help reduce the formation of white spot lesions and caries which is commonly seen with fixed orthodontic treatment. However, this may affect the friction and surface roughness of the bracket-wire assembly which in turn affects the biological tooth movement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 60 samples were included in the study which was divided into four groups. Group-1: • 15 silver coated 0.022 x 0.028” slot MBT prescription maxillary central incisor brackets • 15 silver coated 0.019 x 0.025” stainless-steel wires; Group-2: • 15 uncoated 0.022 x 0.028” slot MBT prescription maxillary central incisor brackets • 15 silver coated 0.019 x 0.025” stainless-steel wires; Group-3: • 15 silver coated 0.022 x 0.028” slot MBT prescription maxillary central incisor brackets • 15 uncoated 0.019 x 0.025” stainless-steel wires; Group-4: • 15 uncoated 0.022x0.028” slot MBT prescription maxillary central incisor brackets • 15 uncoated 0.019 x 0.025” stainless-steel wires. All brackets and wires used were of American Orthodontics, St. Paul, USA. Surface modification of wires and brackets was carried out using the Vacuum Coating Unit model by Thermal Vacuum Evaporation method with silver nanoparticles (10 nm size). The frictional resistance of all brackets and wires was checked using Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: On comparison of maximum load, it was found that friction was highest in group 3, followed by group 1, group 4 and group 2. The mean difference between all groups was found to be statistically significant with a P value < 0.05. The Scanning Electron Microscope studies showed that the surface roughness of silver-coated wires and brackets before the friction test was less compared to uncoated wire-bracket assembly. The surface roughness of the bracket and wire after the friction test was as follows: •Bracket roughness: Group 4> Group 1> Group 2> Group 3 •Wire roughness: Group 4> Group 1> Group 2> Group 3. CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that friction was least when only the wire was coated with silver and the bracket was uncoated and it was the most when the bracket was coated and the wire was uncoated. The surface roughness after the friction test was the least when the wire was uncoated. Key words:Silver nanoparticles, Frictional Resistance, Surface Roughness. Medicina Oral S.L. 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10198687/ /pubmed/37214744 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60357 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Shah, Pooja
Sharma, Padmaja
Naik, Harshit
Patel, Kalpesh
Panchal, Chetan
A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study
title A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study
title_full A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study
title_short A comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- An in-vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of frictional resistance and surface roughness of silver coated and uncoated stainless-steel bracket wire assembly- an in-vitro study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214744
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.60357
work_keys_str_mv AT shahpooja acomparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT sharmapadmaja acomparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT naikharshit acomparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT patelkalpesh acomparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT panchalchetan acomparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT shahpooja comparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT sharmapadmaja comparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT naikharshit comparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT patelkalpesh comparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy
AT panchalchetan comparativeevaluationoffrictionalresistanceandsurfaceroughnessofsilvercoatedanduncoatedstainlesssteelbracketwireassemblyaninvitrostudy