Cargando…

Do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? A global meta-analysis

As primarily sessile organisms, plants often show a non-random spatial distribution of genotypes over distance. This process known as fine-scale spatial genetic structure (FSGS) has been suggested through systematic reviews to depend on life form, mating system, and pollen and seed dispersal vectors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miguel-Peñaloza, Ara, Cultid-Medina, Carlos A, Pérez-Alquicira, Jessica, Rico, Yessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plad019
_version_ 1785044807856422912
author Miguel-Peñaloza, Ara
Cultid-Medina, Carlos A
Pérez-Alquicira, Jessica
Rico, Yessica
author_facet Miguel-Peñaloza, Ara
Cultid-Medina, Carlos A
Pérez-Alquicira, Jessica
Rico, Yessica
author_sort Miguel-Peñaloza, Ara
collection PubMed
description As primarily sessile organisms, plants often show a non-random spatial distribution of genotypes over distance. This process known as fine-scale spatial genetic structure (FSGS) has been suggested through systematic reviews to depend on life form, mating system, and pollen and seed dispersal vectors, while there is no consensus on its behaviour due to external factors, such as anthropogenic habitat changes. By conducting a systematic review and global meta-analysis of empirical FSGS studies, we aimed to evaluate how anthropogenic habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of FSGS in plant populations by means of the Sp statistic. Moreover, we tested how pollination and seed dispersal vectors contribute to the variation of the Sp statistic. We retrieved 243 FSGS studies from 1960 to 2020 of which only 65 were informative for the systematic review. Most empirical studies comprised outcrossers (84%) and trees (67%), with few herbs (23%) and scarce annual species (2%). In weighted meta-analyses for 116 plant populations (31 studies), we did not detect significant effects in the magnitude of effect sizes for the Sp statistic among undisturbed, degraded and fragmented habitats. Results showed significant effects for seed dispersal vectors, but not for pollination. Overall, we observed high variation among the effect sizes (not related to the goodness-of-fit of mixed models) of habitat status, pollination and seed dispersal categories, which precludes identifying biological trends on the Sp statistic. More empirical studies are needed that contrast multiple plant populations in disturbed versus undisturbed habitats, and by increasing the taxonomic groups, such as herbs and annual plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10198778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101987782023-05-21 Do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? A global meta-analysis Miguel-Peñaloza, Ara Cultid-Medina, Carlos A Pérez-Alquicira, Jessica Rico, Yessica AoB Plants Studies As primarily sessile organisms, plants often show a non-random spatial distribution of genotypes over distance. This process known as fine-scale spatial genetic structure (FSGS) has been suggested through systematic reviews to depend on life form, mating system, and pollen and seed dispersal vectors, while there is no consensus on its behaviour due to external factors, such as anthropogenic habitat changes. By conducting a systematic review and global meta-analysis of empirical FSGS studies, we aimed to evaluate how anthropogenic habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of FSGS in plant populations by means of the Sp statistic. Moreover, we tested how pollination and seed dispersal vectors contribute to the variation of the Sp statistic. We retrieved 243 FSGS studies from 1960 to 2020 of which only 65 were informative for the systematic review. Most empirical studies comprised outcrossers (84%) and trees (67%), with few herbs (23%) and scarce annual species (2%). In weighted meta-analyses for 116 plant populations (31 studies), we did not detect significant effects in the magnitude of effect sizes for the Sp statistic among undisturbed, degraded and fragmented habitats. Results showed significant effects for seed dispersal vectors, but not for pollination. Overall, we observed high variation among the effect sizes (not related to the goodness-of-fit of mixed models) of habitat status, pollination and seed dispersal categories, which precludes identifying biological trends on the Sp statistic. More empirical studies are needed that contrast multiple plant populations in disturbed versus undisturbed habitats, and by increasing the taxonomic groups, such as herbs and annual plants. Oxford University Press 2023-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10198778/ /pubmed/37214225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plad019 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Studies
Miguel-Peñaloza, Ara
Cultid-Medina, Carlos A
Pérez-Alquicira, Jessica
Rico, Yessica
Do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? A global meta-analysis
title Do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? A global meta-analysis
title_full Do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? A global meta-analysis
title_fullStr Do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? A global meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? A global meta-analysis
title_short Do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? A global meta-analysis
title_sort do habitat fragmentation and degradation influence the strength of fine-scale spatial genetic structure in plants? a global meta-analysis
topic Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10198778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37214225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plad019
work_keys_str_mv AT miguelpenalozaara dohabitatfragmentationanddegradationinfluencethestrengthoffinescalespatialgeneticstructureinplantsaglobalmetaanalysis
AT cultidmedinacarlosa dohabitatfragmentationanddegradationinfluencethestrengthoffinescalespatialgeneticstructureinplantsaglobalmetaanalysis
AT perezalquicirajessica dohabitatfragmentationanddegradationinfluencethestrengthoffinescalespatialgeneticstructureinplantsaglobalmetaanalysis
AT ricoyessica dohabitatfragmentationanddegradationinfluencethestrengthoffinescalespatialgeneticstructureinplantsaglobalmetaanalysis