Cargando…
Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?
Some automotive companies develop battery electric vehicles (BEVs) with an ultra-long range to address consumers’ range anxiety. However, ultra-long-range BEVs have many problems, and whether they can truly solve consumers’ range anxiety has not been studied. Thus, we build a technology-rich, bottom...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106654 |
_version_ | 1785044894392254464 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Xinglong Zhao, Fuquan Geng, Jingxuan Hao, Han Liu, Zongwei |
author_facet | Liu, Xinglong Zhao, Fuquan Geng, Jingxuan Hao, Han Liu, Zongwei |
author_sort | Liu, Xinglong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Some automotive companies develop battery electric vehicles (BEVs) with an ultra-long range to address consumers’ range anxiety. However, ultra-long-range BEVs have many problems, and whether they can truly solve consumers’ range anxiety has not been studied. Thus, we build a technology-rich, bottom-up approach model to evaluate BEVs’ performance, economy, and total cost of ownership (TCO) to reveal the necessity of developing ultra-long-range BEVs. The results show that the ultra-long-range BEVs’ dynamic, safety, and economy performances are poor compared to short-range BEVs. Based on the TCO analysis considering battery replacement and alternative transportation costs, 400 km is the optimal range of BEVs for consumers. In addition, consumers’ range anxiety is essentially anxiety about energy replenishment. Ultra-long-range BEV cannot really solve consumers’ range anxiety except by reducing charging frequency. In the case of gradually improving the charging and swapping infrastructure, we believe that automotive companies do not need to develop ultra-long-range BEVs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10199263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101992632023-05-21 Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? Liu, Xinglong Zhao, Fuquan Geng, Jingxuan Hao, Han Liu, Zongwei iScience Article Some automotive companies develop battery electric vehicles (BEVs) with an ultra-long range to address consumers’ range anxiety. However, ultra-long-range BEVs have many problems, and whether they can truly solve consumers’ range anxiety has not been studied. Thus, we build a technology-rich, bottom-up approach model to evaluate BEVs’ performance, economy, and total cost of ownership (TCO) to reveal the necessity of developing ultra-long-range BEVs. The results show that the ultra-long-range BEVs’ dynamic, safety, and economy performances are poor compared to short-range BEVs. Based on the TCO analysis considering battery replacement and alternative transportation costs, 400 km is the optimal range of BEVs for consumers. In addition, consumers’ range anxiety is essentially anxiety about energy replenishment. Ultra-long-range BEV cannot really solve consumers’ range anxiety except by reducing charging frequency. In the case of gradually improving the charging and swapping infrastructure, we believe that automotive companies do not need to develop ultra-long-range BEVs. Elsevier 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10199263/ /pubmed/37213236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106654 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Xinglong Zhao, Fuquan Geng, Jingxuan Hao, Han Liu, Zongwei Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? |
title | Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? |
title_full | Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? |
title_short | Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? |
title_sort | comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106654 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuxinglong comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle AT zhaofuquan comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle AT gengjingxuan comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle AT haohan comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle AT liuzongwei comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle |