Cargando…

Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?

Some automotive companies develop battery electric vehicles (BEVs) with an ultra-long range to address consumers’ range anxiety. However, ultra-long-range BEVs have many problems, and whether they can truly solve consumers’ range anxiety has not been studied. Thus, we build a technology-rich, bottom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xinglong, Zhao, Fuquan, Geng, Jingxuan, Hao, Han, Liu, Zongwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106654
_version_ 1785044894392254464
author Liu, Xinglong
Zhao, Fuquan
Geng, Jingxuan
Hao, Han
Liu, Zongwei
author_facet Liu, Xinglong
Zhao, Fuquan
Geng, Jingxuan
Hao, Han
Liu, Zongwei
author_sort Liu, Xinglong
collection PubMed
description Some automotive companies develop battery electric vehicles (BEVs) with an ultra-long range to address consumers’ range anxiety. However, ultra-long-range BEVs have many problems, and whether they can truly solve consumers’ range anxiety has not been studied. Thus, we build a technology-rich, bottom-up approach model to evaluate BEVs’ performance, economy, and total cost of ownership (TCO) to reveal the necessity of developing ultra-long-range BEVs. The results show that the ultra-long-range BEVs’ dynamic, safety, and economy performances are poor compared to short-range BEVs. Based on the TCO analysis considering battery replacement and alternative transportation costs, 400 km is the optimal range of BEVs for consumers. In addition, consumers’ range anxiety is essentially anxiety about energy replenishment. Ultra-long-range BEV cannot really solve consumers’ range anxiety except by reducing charging frequency. In the case of gradually improving the charging and swapping infrastructure, we believe that automotive companies do not need to develop ultra-long-range BEVs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10199263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101992632023-05-21 Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle? Liu, Xinglong Zhao, Fuquan Geng, Jingxuan Hao, Han Liu, Zongwei iScience Article Some automotive companies develop battery electric vehicles (BEVs) with an ultra-long range to address consumers’ range anxiety. However, ultra-long-range BEVs have many problems, and whether they can truly solve consumers’ range anxiety has not been studied. Thus, we build a technology-rich, bottom-up approach model to evaluate BEVs’ performance, economy, and total cost of ownership (TCO) to reveal the necessity of developing ultra-long-range BEVs. The results show that the ultra-long-range BEVs’ dynamic, safety, and economy performances are poor compared to short-range BEVs. Based on the TCO analysis considering battery replacement and alternative transportation costs, 400 km is the optimal range of BEVs for consumers. In addition, consumers’ range anxiety is essentially anxiety about energy replenishment. Ultra-long-range BEV cannot really solve consumers’ range anxiety except by reducing charging frequency. In the case of gradually improving the charging and swapping infrastructure, we believe that automotive companies do not need to develop ultra-long-range BEVs. Elsevier 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10199263/ /pubmed/37213236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106654 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Xinglong
Zhao, Fuquan
Geng, Jingxuan
Hao, Han
Liu, Zongwei
Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?
title Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?
title_full Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?
title_fullStr Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?
title_short Comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: Is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?
title_sort comprehensive assessment for different ranges of battery electric vehicles: is it necessary to develop an ultra-long range battery electric vehicle?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37213236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106654
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxinglong comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle
AT zhaofuquan comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle
AT gengjingxuan comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle
AT haohan comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle
AT liuzongwei comprehensiveassessmentfordifferentrangesofbatteryelectricvehiclesisitnecessarytodevelopanultralongrangebatteryelectricvehicle