Cargando…

Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of 24 months of treatment with ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes as a sub-analysis of the PROTECT study. METHODS: In the PROTECT study, patients were randomized to receive eit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kishimoto, Shinji, Higashi, Yukihito, Imai, Takumi, Eguchi, Kazuo, Fukumoto, Kazuo, Tomiyama, Hirofumi, Maemura, Koji, Tanaka, Atsushi, Node, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01856-x
_version_ 1785044962252947456
author Kishimoto, Shinji
Higashi, Yukihito
Imai, Takumi
Eguchi, Kazuo
Fukumoto, Kazuo
Tomiyama, Hirofumi
Maemura, Koji
Tanaka, Atsushi
Node, Koichi
author_facet Kishimoto, Shinji
Higashi, Yukihito
Imai, Takumi
Eguchi, Kazuo
Fukumoto, Kazuo
Tomiyama, Hirofumi
Maemura, Koji
Tanaka, Atsushi
Node, Koichi
author_sort Kishimoto, Shinji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of 24 months of treatment with ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes as a sub-analysis of the PROTECT study. METHODS: In the PROTECT study, patients were randomized to receive either standard antihyperglycemic treatment (control group, n = 241 ) or add-on ipragliflozin treatment (ipragliflozin group, n = 241) in a 1:1 ratio. Among the 482 patients in the PROTECT study, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) was assessed in 32 patients in the control group and 26 patients in the ipragliflozin group before and after 24 months of treatment. RESULTS: HbA1c levels significantly decreased after 24 months of treatment compared to the baseline value in the ipragliflozin group, but not in the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the changes in HbA1c levels in the two groups (7.4 ± 0.8% vs. 7.0 ± 0.9% in the ipragliflozin group and 7.4 ± 0.7% vs. 7.3 ± 0.7% in the control group; P = 0.08). There was no significant difference between FMD values at baseline and after 24 months in both groups (5.2 ± 2.6% vs. 5.2 ± 2.6%, P = 0.98 in the ipragliflozin group; 5.4 ± 2.9% vs. 5.0 ± 3.2%, P = 0.34 in the control group). There was no significant difference in the estimated percentage change in FMD between the two groups (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 24-month period, the addition of ipragliflozin to standard therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes did not change endothelial function assessed by FMD in the brachial artery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration Number for Clinical Trial: jRCT1071220089 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1071220089).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10199575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101995752023-05-21 Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study Kishimoto, Shinji Higashi, Yukihito Imai, Takumi Eguchi, Kazuo Fukumoto, Kazuo Tomiyama, Hirofumi Maemura, Koji Tanaka, Atsushi Node, Koichi Cardiovasc Diabetol Research BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of 24 months of treatment with ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes as a sub-analysis of the PROTECT study. METHODS: In the PROTECT study, patients were randomized to receive either standard antihyperglycemic treatment (control group, n = 241 ) or add-on ipragliflozin treatment (ipragliflozin group, n = 241) in a 1:1 ratio. Among the 482 patients in the PROTECT study, flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) was assessed in 32 patients in the control group and 26 patients in the ipragliflozin group before and after 24 months of treatment. RESULTS: HbA1c levels significantly decreased after 24 months of treatment compared to the baseline value in the ipragliflozin group, but not in the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the changes in HbA1c levels in the two groups (7.4 ± 0.8% vs. 7.0 ± 0.9% in the ipragliflozin group and 7.4 ± 0.7% vs. 7.3 ± 0.7% in the control group; P = 0.08). There was no significant difference between FMD values at baseline and after 24 months in both groups (5.2 ± 2.6% vs. 5.2 ± 2.6%, P = 0.98 in the ipragliflozin group; 5.4 ± 2.9% vs. 5.0 ± 3.2%, P = 0.34 in the control group). There was no significant difference in the estimated percentage change in FMD between the two groups (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Over a 24-month period, the addition of ipragliflozin to standard therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes did not change endothelial function assessed by FMD in the brachial artery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration Number for Clinical Trial: jRCT1071220089 (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1071220089). BioMed Central 2023-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10199575/ /pubmed/37210524 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01856-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kishimoto, Shinji
Higashi, Yukihito
Imai, Takumi
Eguchi, Kazuo
Fukumoto, Kazuo
Tomiyama, Hirofumi
Maemura, Koji
Tanaka, Atsushi
Node, Koichi
Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study
title Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study
title_full Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study
title_fullStr Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study
title_full_unstemmed Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study
title_short Lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the PROTECT study
title_sort lack of impact of ipragliflozin on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: sub-analysis of the protect study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210524
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-023-01856-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kishimotoshinji lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT higashiyukihito lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT imaitakumi lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT eguchikazuo lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT fukumotokazuo lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT tomiyamahirofumi lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT maemurakoji lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT tanakaatsushi lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT nodekoichi lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy
AT lackofimpactofipragliflozinonendothelialfunctioninpatientswithtype2diabetessubanalysisoftheprotectstudy