Cargando…
Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit
BACKGROUND: This study used an epidural anesthesia practice kit (model) to evaluate the accuracy of epidural anesthesia using standard techniques (blind) and augmented/mixed reality technology and whether visualization using augmented/mixed reality technology would facilitate epidural anesthesia. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02133-w |
_version_ | 1785044963546890240 |
---|---|
author | Hayasaka, Tatsuya Kawano, Kazuharu Onodera, Yu Suzuki, Hiroto Nakane, Masaki Kanoto, Masafumi Kawamae, Kaneyuki |
author_facet | Hayasaka, Tatsuya Kawano, Kazuharu Onodera, Yu Suzuki, Hiroto Nakane, Masaki Kanoto, Masafumi Kawamae, Kaneyuki |
author_sort | Hayasaka, Tatsuya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study used an epidural anesthesia practice kit (model) to evaluate the accuracy of epidural anesthesia using standard techniques (blind) and augmented/mixed reality technology and whether visualization using augmented/mixed reality technology would facilitate epidural anesthesia. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Yamagata University Hospital (Yamagata, Japan) between February and June 2022. Thirty medical students with no experience in epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into augmented reality (-), augmented reality (+), and semi-augmented reality groups, with 10 students in each group. Epidural anesthesia was performed using the paramedian approach with an epidural anesthesia practice kit. The augmented reality (-) group performed epidural anesthesia without HoloLens2Ⓡ and the augmented reality (+) group with HoloLens2Ⓡ. The semi-augmented reality group performed epidural anesthesia without HoloLens2Ⓡ after 30 s of image construction of the spine using HoloLens2Ⓡ. The epidural space puncture point distance between the ideal insertion needle and participant’s insertion needle was compared. RESULTS: Four medical students in the augmented reality (-), zero in the augmented reality (+), and one in the semi-augmented reality groups failed to insert the needle into the epidural space. The epidural space puncture point distance for the augmented reality (-), augmented reality (+), and semi-augmented reality groups were 8.7 (5.7–14.3) mm, 3.5 (1.8–8.0) mm (P = 0.017), and 4.9 (3.2–5.9) mm (P = 0.027), respectively; a significant difference was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Augmented/mixed reality technology has the potential to contribute significantly to the improvement of epidural anesthesia techniques. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02133-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10199582 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101995822023-05-21 Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit Hayasaka, Tatsuya Kawano, Kazuharu Onodera, Yu Suzuki, Hiroto Nakane, Masaki Kanoto, Masafumi Kawamae, Kaneyuki BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: This study used an epidural anesthesia practice kit (model) to evaluate the accuracy of epidural anesthesia using standard techniques (blind) and augmented/mixed reality technology and whether visualization using augmented/mixed reality technology would facilitate epidural anesthesia. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Yamagata University Hospital (Yamagata, Japan) between February and June 2022. Thirty medical students with no experience in epidural anesthesia were randomly divided into augmented reality (-), augmented reality (+), and semi-augmented reality groups, with 10 students in each group. Epidural anesthesia was performed using the paramedian approach with an epidural anesthesia practice kit. The augmented reality (-) group performed epidural anesthesia without HoloLens2Ⓡ and the augmented reality (+) group with HoloLens2Ⓡ. The semi-augmented reality group performed epidural anesthesia without HoloLens2Ⓡ after 30 s of image construction of the spine using HoloLens2Ⓡ. The epidural space puncture point distance between the ideal insertion needle and participant’s insertion needle was compared. RESULTS: Four medical students in the augmented reality (-), zero in the augmented reality (+), and one in the semi-augmented reality groups failed to insert the needle into the epidural space. The epidural space puncture point distance for the augmented reality (-), augmented reality (+), and semi-augmented reality groups were 8.7 (5.7–14.3) mm, 3.5 (1.8–8.0) mm (P = 0.017), and 4.9 (3.2–5.9) mm (P = 0.027), respectively; a significant difference was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Augmented/mixed reality technology has the potential to contribute significantly to the improvement of epidural anesthesia techniques. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-023-02133-w. BioMed Central 2023-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10199582/ /pubmed/37210521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02133-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Hayasaka, Tatsuya Kawano, Kazuharu Onodera, Yu Suzuki, Hiroto Nakane, Masaki Kanoto, Masafumi Kawamae, Kaneyuki Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit |
title | Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit |
title_full | Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit |
title_fullStr | Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit |
title_short | Comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit |
title_sort | comparison of accuracy between augmented reality/mixed reality techniques and conventional techniques for epidural anesthesia using a practice phantom model kit |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199582/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37210521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02133-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayasakatatsuya comparisonofaccuracybetweenaugmentedrealitymixedrealitytechniquesandconventionaltechniquesforepiduralanesthesiausingapracticephantommodelkit AT kawanokazuharu comparisonofaccuracybetweenaugmentedrealitymixedrealitytechniquesandconventionaltechniquesforepiduralanesthesiausingapracticephantommodelkit AT onoderayu comparisonofaccuracybetweenaugmentedrealitymixedrealitytechniquesandconventionaltechniquesforepiduralanesthesiausingapracticephantommodelkit AT suzukihiroto comparisonofaccuracybetweenaugmentedrealitymixedrealitytechniquesandconventionaltechniquesforepiduralanesthesiausingapracticephantommodelkit AT nakanemasaki comparisonofaccuracybetweenaugmentedrealitymixedrealitytechniquesandconventionaltechniquesforepiduralanesthesiausingapracticephantommodelkit AT kanotomasafumi comparisonofaccuracybetweenaugmentedrealitymixedrealitytechniquesandconventionaltechniquesforepiduralanesthesiausingapracticephantommodelkit AT kawamaekaneyuki comparisonofaccuracybetweenaugmentedrealitymixedrealitytechniquesandconventionaltechniquesforepiduralanesthesiausingapracticephantommodelkit |